Videos

Ezekiel’s Wheel is an absorbing fable

Like most speculative fiction (and every original Star Trek episode), Ezekiel’s Wheel is a fable: a story whose moral applies to circumstances other than those being described. Determining whether that moral is “Absolute power corrupts absolutely,” or “You’ve got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything,” or even “We have met the enemy and he is us” is one of the many pleasures of MPAACT’s world premiere of Addae Moon’s play.

Ezekiel’s Wheel Through 3/5: Thu-Sat 8 PM, Sun 3 PM, Greenhouse Theater Center, 2257 N. Lincoln, greenhousetheater.org, $34-$37

“Pleasure” might seem an odd descriptor for the piece, whose dystopian premise is that a conflagration has left Georgia divided into The Province, a 1984-style dictatorship, and the Insurgents, who maintain the customs and beliefs of a past The Province denies ever existed.  Those beliefs include faith in prophecy by any person born with a caul over his face, including our titular character. 

To say more about the plot would spoil the fun, but director Lauren “LL” Lundy manages to create a world well worth immersing yourself in. Her casting is impeccable: the evil Chancellor is portrayed by Andrew Malone with a creepy bonhomie featuring a Mao-like smile that has nothing to do with good humor. As Baba, the father of Ezekiel and his unprophetic brother Andrew, Darren Jones embodies all the earned wisdom of a lifetime, while Noelle Klyce as the sergeant who keeps him captive beautifully conveys the ambivalence of every prison guard who is still a human being. Jordan Gleaves, as the prophet who doesn’t understand his own visions, and Tamarus Harvell, as the brother who doesn’t believe them until it’s too late, round out the excellent cast.

Read More

Ezekiel’s Wheel is an absorbing fable Read More »

Chicago Cubs fans know this season is setting up to be the best since the team’s World Series winning core of players fell apart after the 2018 season.

Thanks to Caesars Sportsbook, residents of Illinois can get ahead of the Cubs hype this season with a risk-free bet worth up to $1,250!

You can’t lose with your first bet at Caesars as long as you follow the step-by-step instructions below.

Caesars Illinois Promo

This offer is only available to new users in Illinois and it won’t be around forever.

Here’s what you do:

Sign up for Caesars using this linkVerify your identityUse the promo code FSNHLFULLDeposit $10 or more

That’s all that’s asked of you. Once your account is set up and loaded up, it’s time for you to decide how you want to play your can’t-lose wager.

It all comes down to how confident you are in your Cubbies this season.

Do you think they could win the division? It’s not far-fetched to think Chicago could catch Milwaukee and Saint Louis after finishing in a distant third place to both teams last season. You can get the Cubs to win the NL Central at +600 odds right now at Caesars.

If that’s too tough in your mind, maybe try betting on the Cubs to make the playoffs at +285 odds. Chicago has made significant additions this offseason that could have them in contention for a Wild Card spot at the least.

If you bet $1,250 on Chicago to make the postseason and they did, you’d profit $3,562.50!! If they didn’t make it, it’s no skin off your back. The money you risked would be deposited back into your account to use as bonus bets.

You can’t lose your first bet no matter how you play it. Don’t miss out on the preseason value. Sign up with Caesars today.

Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change.

Read More

Read More »

Chicago gets its first Alamo Drafthouse

The vibes are immaculate, joked one of my friends as we walked into the new Alamo Drafthouse Cinema in Wrigleyville, which opened a few weeks ago. I’d been to only one other location, which had been retrofitted inside the over 100-year-old Mission Theatre in San Francisco. Those vibes weren’t so immaculate; the Mission is an old theater, so no amount of restoration can make it shine like a new penny. But I liked that, so I’d had a relatively good impression of the fabled movie theater chain.

The first Alamo Drafthouse opened in 1997 in Austin, Texas. Since then the company has grown profusely, with 39 locations nationwide. The lore around the chain centered on its vaguely nontraditional programming; the extensive food and beverage menus; limited-edition movie posters; and—most famously or infamously, depending on what kind of movie watcher you are—their draconian rules around theater etiquette.

In 2011, Tim League, the theater’s cofounder, former CEO, and now executive chairman, received an irate voicemail from a customer who’d been kicked out for texting. The company then began using it as a pre-show advisory commercial and uploaded the bit to YouTube, where the customer’s Karen-esque rant promptly went viral. Some of the Alamo’s other conditions are not allowing infants or small children (except at special kid-friendly screenings), requiring that guests under 18 be accompanied by an adult, and not showing advertisements before movies. 

Going into this new Alamo Drafthouse in Wrigleyville (its location either an attraction or a deterrent, again depending on what kind of moviegoer you are), I felt neutral in terms of what to expect. Some things I’d experienced or heard about in the past had been good, but some others, like the absence of celluloid projection at this particular location and early suggestions of overly nostalgic programming, had me wondering.  

There’s little to discern that the theater is where it actually is, with no marquee or obvious signage to denote its presence. It’s on the third floor of the building, right above a UFC Gym. (Should you want to violently debate someone about whatever film you just saw, I imagine that’d be the place to do it.) When the elevator doors open, one immediately gets a holistic view of the theater’s offerings, from the bar and seating area to Video Vortex, an in-house video rental store (more on that later).

The pièce de résistance of the theater’s decor is a to-scale model of the backside of the 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder that crashes out a window in John Hughes’s 1986 comedy Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, complete with the NRVOUS license plate and fake shards of glass hanging from the ceiling that appear to be flying out amidst the wreckage. It’s impressive but also kitschy, and unapologetically so. (Below it on the floor is a decal that quotes Ferris’s famous line: “If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.”) It’s also a testament to the impersonal, “Instagrammable” branding style that’s come to dominate social media in recent years, existing to be propagated into the ether.

Video Vortex, the video rental inside the theater, is modest, though it apparently contains more than 10,000 Blu-rays, DVDs, and even VHS tapes that people can rent—for free. Listen, something being free is never a bad thing. Something being free often allows it to be accessible, which is a net-positive in the grand scheme of things. Still, it’s lamentable that stores like Odd Obsession Movies have been forced to close in recent years, while the same business model is being used essentially as a gimmick by a corporate chain. (Thankfully, FACETS’s video rental store soldiers on.) To give a little more credit where it’s due, Video Vortex also rents out DVD and VHS players for a small fee, so those without this sadly outmoded technology can enjoy the thrill of physical media.

An installation made of old-school television sets, reminiscent of a Nam June Paik sculpture, adorns the eating area, where the tables are topped with vintage B movie lobby cards. Decorations in the style of VHS labels—Comedy! Drama! Adult! 3-Day Rental! Be Kind Please Rewind!—cover the walls. The bar next to it boasts a full menu, complete with movie-themed cocktails. A good theme is my Achilles’ heel, so I couldn’t help but to admire the list: Y Tú Margarita También; Third-Rate Vaudevillians, a rye-based cocktail for the 1936 W.C. Fields film The Old Fashioned Way; and the classic mint julep and Mississippi punch for Baz Luhrman’s The Great Gatsby and  Blake Edwards’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s, respectively. I opted for the Tokyo Drifter, named after Seijun Suzuki’s 1966 film. Mixed with whiskey and bourbon, it was pretty damn good. There are other libations, of course, craft beer initially being a thing for which the Alamo Drafthouse was known. But like much else with the theater chain, they seemed to have moved past the homier stalwarts into fancier fare.

Like with the food. The concept of eating an actual meal at a movie theater is no longer the novelty it once was, with several AMC Dine-In theaters dominating the concept in and around the Chicagoland area. The Alamo Drafthouse follows the same idea, with moviegoers (or is it diners?) being able to order complete meals from their seats by writing one’s order down on a slip of paper and remotely signaling a waiter (apparently “ninja-trained,” as they don all black and crouch down low so as not to impede anyone’s view of the movie), who then takes the paper and returns summarily with food and drink. 

Alamo Drafthouse Wrigleyville$11.99-$14.99, discounts available for kids, students, seniors, military, police, fire, EMS, and guests with disabilities3519 N. Clark, Suite C301872-298-3961

I wanted to try an array of options, so my friends and I started with the loaded fries and a limited-time menu item, the brussels sprouts pizza. (In addition to such items, the theater also offers special menus themed with certain movies.) Some of the appetizers fall under the nebulous category of being southwestern, and the fries were one of those. Topped with Hatch green chile queso, Tillamook cheddar, cotija, bacon, and sriracha sour cream, among other garnishes, the fries were easily my favorite thing I ate. The pizza was fine, though nothing to write home about and certainly not as substantial as pizza from a regular restaurant. 

I’d done some research beforehand to determine what was popular on their menu, so seeing that moviegoers liked their fried pickles, we selected what seemed like their current corollary, the pickle fries. I like regular fried pickles, so I expected to like them in this unusual variation. Alas, it remains true that you can’t improve upon perfection; the pickle fries exceed the pickle-to-fry ratio that makes the originals so delicious. And the ranch dipping sauce just made them worse, at least to me, as I’m particularly bothered by putting a wet thing (the ranch) on another wet thing (the pickle). Does that make sense? Probably not. Still, did it impede my enjoyment of the pickle fries? Yes, yes it did. 

The hand-breaded chicken tenders were similarly disappointing, with the breading falling off almost immediately. It’d been a while since I’d had chicken tenders served with gravy on the side, so I was looking forward to the Hatch green chile version that accompanied them. It was bland, not adding much to the dish at all. It may be worth noting the ketchup that came on the side of the fries that came with the tenders was the reddest I’d ever seen. 

And what’s a movie without popcorn? Initially we intended to forgo their regular popcorn and try the churro popcorn, which has pieces of churro in it, as well as a blend of cinnamon, sugar, maple, and vanilla, but they were out. So we got the regular bottomless popcorn—the bottomless here being wishful thinking, as we were full from the heavier fare and didn’t even finish it, even with truffle parmesan seasoning.

I’ve come this far and not even revealed what I was seeing. I chose a repertory screening (which the theater offers in addition to newer movies, along with special screenings ranging from sneak peeks to brunches and movie parties, like the upcoming Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania cosplay screening) of John Hughes’s aforementioned teen classic, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, in part because the theater has been christened the John Hughes Cinema in tribute to the filmmaker who spent several of his formative years growing up in Northbrook and several of whose films are set in and around Chicago. A special plaque at the theater’s entrance, next to the Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder, declares that, in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Hughes “perfectly captured the mischievous and carefree spirit of youth . . . cementing Chicago as a cinematic playground in the process.”

The movie, like much else about the overall experience, was fine. I’d seen it before, but it never resonated with me, even though it’s indisputably a love letter to one of the greatest cities in the world. The experience of seeing it was about as good as seeing any other movie at a multiplex, with big screens, comfortable chairs, and crisp digital projection. I don’t doubt that the folks over at Alamo Drafthouse love cinema and aspire for their Chicago location to become an integral part of the city’s moviegoing fabric. But like Hughes’s movie, it’s a love letter to a different kind of Chicago, one where the vibes are immaculate and the real city—with grit, grime, uncomfortable chairs, and crunchy film stock—is nowhere to be found.


Read More

Chicago gets its first Alamo Drafthouse Read More »

#OscarsSoWhite

This past fall, TimeLine offered a blistering revival of Alice Childress’s Trouble in Mind, in which a Black actress in a 1950s Broadway play about lynching (penned and directed by white men, naturally) takes a stand against the insulting stereotypes in the script and the microaggressions in the rehearsal room. They’ve followed that up with what feels like a natural progression—even if the story takes place around 15 years earlier.

In Boulevard of Bold Dreams, playwright LaDarrion Williams imagines an encounter two Black employees at the Ambassador Hotel have on February 29, 1940, with Hattie McDaniel. It’s the night of the Academy Awards, held in the hotel’s Cocoanut Grove nightclub. McDaniel (Gabrielle Lott-Rogers) is the odds-on favorite to make history and win the Oscar as best supporting actress for playing Mammy in Gone With the Wind—which would make her the first Black performer to take home the golden man. But she’s not allowed to sit with the rest of the cast, because the Cocoanut Grove is segregated. The best they’ll do for her is provide a small table at the back of the bus, er, room, where she can sit with her companion. 

Boulevard of Bold Dreams Through 3/19: Wed-Thu 7:30 PM, Fri 8 PM, Sat 4 and 8 PM, Sun 2 PM; distanced performance Wed 3/1, open captions Fri 3/10 and Sat 3/11 4 PM, audio description Fri 3/17; TimeLine Theatre, 615 W. Wellington, 773-281-8463, ext. 6, timelinetheatre.com, $42-$57 (students 35 percent off with valid ID; $25 tickets to U.S. military personnel, veterans, first responders, and their spouses and family)

McDaniel isn’t just facing white supremacy within her industry. She’s also facing criticism for taking the role of Mammy in the first place from civil rights organizations, such as the NAACP, and some members of the Black press. William L. Patterson, reviewing GWTW in the Chicago Defender, called it “a weapon of terror against black America.”

He wasn’t wrong. (McDaniel wasn’t allowed to attend the film’s Atlanta premiere at all, so by comparison, the Academy is being “generous” in its accommodations.) But what Williams’s play, directed in its world premiere here by Malkia Stampley, accomplishes (sometimes a little too neatly) is to dissect the ways in which a performer like McDaniel has to negotiate between surviving in the industry and keeping her dignity and her soul. 

Those are lessons that also unfold over the 100-minute course of the play for aspiring director/bartender Arthur (Charles Andrew Gardner) and his best friend and sounding board Dottie (Mildred Marie Langford), who came to Hollywood with him from their small town in Alabama. Dottie is a singer and actress, but her job as a maid at the Ambassador and the double whammy of sexual and racial harassment seems to have killed her dreams. Arthur, though, is still holding fast to the goal of directing his own film and is waiting for a call from someone who’s promised to sell him the equipment to help make that happen.

It’s a taut and absorbing show for the most part, punctuated with some stellar fireworks, particularly between Langford’s Dottie and Lott-Rogers’s Hattie. And yes, the latter does utter one of the classic lines often attributed to McDaniel: “I’d rather play a maid than be one,” which of course hits harder when she says it to another Black woman who actually is a maid. Ryan Emens’s cozy set captures the feeling of both a temporary sanctuary for McDaniel (who comes in while the bar is closed, saying “I won’t be no trouble to nobody”) and a private club where the three characters can speak freely of their creative passions and personal pain in ways they can’t in front of the white hotel guests and Hollywood bigwigs.

Williams himself is a son of Alabama who wrote this play while living in his car. (He and Stampley also collaborated on a couple of original songs we hear in the show.) Boulevard of Bold Dreams taps into both the larger-than-life visions offered on the silver screen, and an astringent view of what it takes to get up there without losing everything that makes you who you are in the first place. By the time we see a video montage (created by Rasean Davonté Johnson) of all the Black women who followed McDaniel into the Oscar spotlight, it’s easy to feel both fresh appreciation for McDaniel’s achievement and sorrowful anger for those who were denied even the limited opportunities she received.


Read More

#OscarsSoWhite Read More »

Chicago gets its first Alamo Drafthouse

The vibes are immaculate, joked one of my friends as we walked into the new Alamo Drafthouse Cinema in Wrigleyville, which opened a few weeks ago. I’d been to only one other location, which had been retrofitted inside the over 100-year-old Mission Theatre in San Francisco. Those vibes weren’t so immaculate; the Mission is an old theater, so no amount of restoration can make it shine like a new penny. But I liked that, so I’d had a relatively good impression of the fabled movie theater chain.

The first Alamo Drafthouse opened in 1997 in Austin, Texas. Since then the company has grown profusely, with 39 locations nationwide. The lore around the chain centered on its vaguely nontraditional programming; the extensive food and beverage menus; limited-edition movie posters; and—most famously or infamously, depending on what kind of movie watcher you are—their draconian rules around theater etiquette.

In 2011, Tim League, the theater’s cofounder, former CEO, and now executive chairman, received an irate voicemail from a customer who’d been kicked out for texting. The company then began using it as a pre-show advisory commercial and uploaded the bit to YouTube, where the customer’s Karen-esque rant promptly went viral. Some of the Alamo’s other conditions are not allowing infants or small children (except at special kid-friendly screenings), requiring that guests under 18 be accompanied by an adult, and not showing advertisements before movies. 

Going into this new Alamo Drafthouse in Wrigleyville (its location either an attraction or a deterrent, again depending on what kind of moviegoer you are), I felt neutral in terms of what to expect. Some things I’d experienced or heard about in the past had been good, but some others, like the absence of celluloid projection at this particular location and early suggestions of overly nostalgic programming, had me wondering.  

There’s little to discern that the theater is where it actually is, with no marquee or obvious signage to denote its presence. It’s on the third floor of the building, right above a UFC Gym. (Should you want to violently debate someone about whatever film you just saw, I imagine that’d be the place to do it.) When the elevator doors open, one immediately gets a holistic view of the theater’s offerings, from the bar and seating area to Video Vortex, an in-house video rental store (more on that later).

The pièce de résistance of the theater’s decor is a to-scale model of the backside of the 1961 Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder that crashes out a window in John Hughes’s 1986 comedy Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, complete with the NRVOUS license plate and fake shards of glass hanging from the ceiling that appear to be flying out amidst the wreckage. It’s impressive but also kitschy, and unapologetically so. (Below it on the floor is a decal that quotes Ferris’s famous line: “If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.”) It’s also a testament to the impersonal, “Instagrammable” branding style that’s come to dominate social media in recent years, existing to be propagated into the ether.

Video Vortex, the video rental inside the theater, is modest, though it apparently contains more than 10,000 Blu-rays, DVDs, and even VHS tapes that people can rent—for free. Listen, something being free is never a bad thing. Something being free often allows it to be accessible, which is a net-positive in the grand scheme of things. Still, it’s lamentable that stores like Odd Obsession Movies have been forced to close in recent years, while the same business model is being used essentially as a gimmick by a corporate chain. (Thankfully, FACETS’s video rental store soldiers on.) To give a little more credit where it’s due, Video Vortex also rents out DVD and VHS players for a small fee, so those without this sadly outmoded technology can enjoy the thrill of physical media.

An installation made of old-school television sets, reminiscent of a Nam June Paik sculpture, adorns the eating area, where the tables are topped with vintage B movie lobby cards. Decorations in the style of VHS labels—Comedy! Drama! Adult! 3-Day Rental! Be Kind Please Rewind!—cover the walls. The bar next to it boasts a full menu, complete with movie-themed cocktails. A good theme is my Achilles’ heel, so I couldn’t help but to admire the list: Y Tú Margarita También; Third-Rate Vaudevillians, a rye-based cocktail for the 1936 W.C. Fields film The Old Fashioned Way; and the classic mint julep and Mississippi punch for Baz Luhrman’s The Great Gatsby and  Blake Edwards’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s, respectively. I opted for the Tokyo Drifter, named after Seijun Suzuki’s 1966 film. Mixed with whiskey and bourbon, it was pretty damn good. There are other libations, of course, craft beer initially being a thing for which the Alamo Drafthouse was known. But like much else with the theater chain, they seemed to have moved past the homier stalwarts into fancier fare.

Like with the food. The concept of eating an actual meal at a movie theater is no longer the novelty it once was, with several AMC Dine-In theaters dominating the concept in and around the Chicagoland area. The Alamo Drafthouse follows the same idea, with moviegoers (or is it diners?) being able to order complete meals from their seats by writing one’s order down on a slip of paper and remotely signaling a waiter (apparently “ninja-trained,” as they don all black and crouch down low so as not to impede anyone’s view of the movie), who then takes the paper and returns summarily with food and drink. 

Alamo Drafthouse Wrigleyville$11.99-$14.99, discounts available for kids, students, seniors, military, police, fire, EMS, and guests with disabilities3519 N. Clark, Suite C301872-298-3961

I wanted to try an array of options, so my friends and I started with the loaded fries and a limited-time menu item, the brussels sprouts pizza. (In addition to such items, the theater also offers special menus themed with certain movies.) Some of the appetizers fall under the nebulous category of being southwestern, and the fries were one of those. Topped with Hatch green chile queso, Tillamook cheddar, cotija, bacon, and sriracha sour cream, among other garnishes, the fries were easily my favorite thing I ate. The pizza was fine, though nothing to write home about and certainly not as substantial as pizza from a regular restaurant. 

I’d done some research beforehand to determine what was popular on their menu, so seeing that moviegoers liked their fried pickles, we selected what seemed like their current corollary, the pickle fries. I like regular fried pickles, so I expected to like them in this unusual variation. Alas, it remains true that you can’t improve upon perfection; the pickle fries exceed the pickle-to-fry ratio that makes the originals so delicious. And the ranch dipping sauce just made them worse, at least to me, as I’m particularly bothered by putting a wet thing (the ranch) on another wet thing (the pickle). Does that make sense? Probably not. Still, did it impede my enjoyment of the pickle fries? Yes, yes it did. 

The hand-breaded chicken tenders were similarly disappointing, with the breading falling off almost immediately. It’d been a while since I’d had chicken tenders served with gravy on the side, so I was looking forward to the Hatch green chile version that accompanied them. It was bland, not adding much to the dish at all. It may be worth noting the ketchup that came on the side of the fries that came with the tenders was the reddest I’d ever seen. 

And what’s a movie without popcorn? Initially we intended to forgo their regular popcorn and try the churro popcorn, which has pieces of churro in it, as well as a blend of cinnamon, sugar, maple, and vanilla, but they were out. So we got the regular bottomless popcorn—the bottomless here being wishful thinking, as we were full from the heavier fare and didn’t even finish it, even with truffle parmesan seasoning.

I’ve come this far and not even revealed what I was seeing. I chose a repertory screening (which the theater offers in addition to newer movies, along with special screenings ranging from sneak peeks to brunches and movie parties, like the upcoming Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania cosplay screening) of John Hughes’s aforementioned teen classic, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, in part because the theater has been christened the John Hughes Cinema in tribute to the filmmaker who spent several of his formative years growing up in Northbrook and several of whose films are set in and around Chicago. A special plaque at the theater’s entrance, next to the Ferrari 250 GT California Spyder, declares that, in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Hughes “perfectly captured the mischievous and carefree spirit of youth . . . cementing Chicago as a cinematic playground in the process.”

The movie, like much else about the overall experience, was fine. I’d seen it before, but it never resonated with me, even though it’s indisputably a love letter to one of the greatest cities in the world. The experience of seeing it was about as good as seeing any other movie at a multiplex, with big screens, comfortable chairs, and crisp digital projection. I don’t doubt that the folks over at Alamo Drafthouse love cinema and aspire for their Chicago location to become an integral part of the city’s moviegoing fabric. But like Hughes’s movie, it’s a love letter to a different kind of Chicago, one where the vibes are immaculate and the real city—with grit, grime, uncomfortable chairs, and crunchy film stock—is nowhere to be found.


Read More

Chicago gets its first Alamo Drafthouse Read More »

#OscarsSoWhite

This past fall, TimeLine offered a blistering revival of Alice Childress’s Trouble in Mind, in which a Black actress in a 1950s Broadway play about lynching (penned and directed by white men, naturally) takes a stand against the insulting stereotypes in the script and the microaggressions in the rehearsal room. They’ve followed that up with what feels like a natural progression—even if the story takes place around 15 years earlier.

In Boulevard of Bold Dreams, playwright LaDarrion Williams imagines an encounter two Black employees at the Ambassador Hotel have on February 29, 1940, with Hattie McDaniel. It’s the night of the Academy Awards, held in the hotel’s Cocoanut Grove nightclub. McDaniel (Gabrielle Lott-Rogers) is the odds-on favorite to make history and win the Oscar as best supporting actress for playing Mammy in Gone With the Wind—which would make her the first Black performer to take home the golden man. But she’s not allowed to sit with the rest of the cast, because the Cocoanut Grove is segregated. The best they’ll do for her is provide a small table at the back of the bus, er, room, where she can sit with her companion. 

Boulevard of Bold Dreams Through 3/19: Wed-Thu 7:30 PM, Fri 8 PM, Sat 4 and 8 PM, Sun 2 PM; distanced performance Wed 3/1, open captions Fri 3/10 and Sat 3/11 4 PM, audio description Fri 3/17; TimeLine Theatre, 615 W. Wellington, 773-281-8463, ext. 6, timelinetheatre.com, $42-$57 (students 35 percent off with valid ID; $25 tickets to U.S. military personnel, veterans, first responders, and their spouses and family)

McDaniel isn’t just facing white supremacy within her industry. She’s also facing criticism for taking the role of Mammy in the first place from civil rights organizations, such as the NAACP, and some members of the Black press. William L. Patterson, reviewing GWTW in the Chicago Defender, called it “a weapon of terror against black America.”

He wasn’t wrong. (McDaniel wasn’t allowed to attend the film’s Atlanta premiere at all, so by comparison, the Academy is being “generous” in its accommodations.) But what Williams’s play, directed in its world premiere here by Malkia Stampley, accomplishes (sometimes a little too neatly) is to dissect the ways in which a performer like McDaniel has to negotiate between surviving in the industry and keeping her dignity and her soul. 

Those are lessons that also unfold over the 100-minute course of the play for aspiring director/bartender Arthur (Charles Andrew Gardner) and his best friend and sounding board Dottie (Mildred Marie Langford), who came to Hollywood with him from their small town in Alabama. Dottie is a singer and actress, but her job as a maid at the Ambassador and the double whammy of sexual and racial harassment seems to have killed her dreams. Arthur, though, is still holding fast to the goal of directing his own film and is waiting for a call from someone who’s promised to sell him the equipment to help make that happen.

It’s a taut and absorbing show for the most part, punctuated with some stellar fireworks, particularly between Langford’s Dottie and Lott-Rogers’s Hattie. And yes, the latter does utter one of the classic lines often attributed to McDaniel: “I’d rather play a maid than be one,” which of course hits harder when she says it to another Black woman who actually is a maid. Ryan Emens’s cozy set captures the feeling of both a temporary sanctuary for McDaniel (who comes in while the bar is closed, saying “I won’t be no trouble to nobody”) and a private club where the three characters can speak freely of their creative passions and personal pain in ways they can’t in front of the white hotel guests and Hollywood bigwigs.

Williams himself is a son of Alabama who wrote this play while living in his car. (He and Stampley also collaborated on a couple of original songs we hear in the show.) Boulevard of Bold Dreams taps into both the larger-than-life visions offered on the silver screen, and an astringent view of what it takes to get up there without losing everything that makes you who you are in the first place. By the time we see a video montage (created by Rasean Davonté Johnson) of all the Black women who followed McDaniel into the Oscar spotlight, it’s easy to feel both fresh appreciation for McDaniel’s achievement and sorrowful anger for those who were denied even the limited opportunities she received.


Read More

#OscarsSoWhite Read More »

Russell Westbrook would be punishment for Bulls’ sin of underperforming

I’ve been racking my brain for days trying to understand why the Bulls would have an interest in signing the fractious Russell Westbrook. They do, apparently. That was the first possible explanation, that it was a bad rumor with no foundation in truth.

But assuming the speculation is true, why in the world would the team want someone as polarizing as Westbrook? “Energy” is the fashionable answer to that question. It’s the one that’s been bandied about in the Bulls-sphere. Even at 34, he could bring electricity to an unplugged, unresponsive roster, we’re told.

Or maybe the Bulls think he’ll suddenly morph into a generous-to-a-fault point guard. Could that be it? Have they gotten word of some sort of late-career epiphany?

Sorry, no. Nothing about this possible pairing makes sense, basketball-wise.

And that’s it. That’s the answer. Westbrook as a Bull doesn’t make sense in any concrete way, but it does make sense as a cosmic judgment.

Russell Westbrook would be punishment.

He’d be punishment for a badly underperforming team. He’d be punishment for Bulls players who talk about how much they enjoy playing with each other but can’t win with each other. He’d be punishment for the group failure of Zach LaVine, DeMar DeRozan and Nikola Vucevic, who were supposed to be so much more and haven’t been.

If Westbrook takes a buyout from the Jazz and comes to Chicago, it means a formerly great player and a forever pain in the butt will be moving into the Bulls’ locker room. You get what you deserve in the NBA, and LaVine & Co. deserve whatever strife and friction Westbrook would bring. A lot is the guess here.

This would be punishment for Bulls vice president Arturas Karnisovas, too, which might seem odd, given that he’d be the one signing Westbrook. But he’s the man who built this team, and maybe he believes he deserves to be flogged.

Westbrook doesn’t help teams. He puts them in jams. He’s a once-supremely talented player who has a hard time being anything but what he was born to be on a basketball court: the center of attention. Does that sound like the solution for whatever ails the Bulls?

He’s a brand, not the missing piece to a puzzle. He’s much more James Harden than he is Jrue Holiday. He’s not even close to the triple-double machine he used to be. He forgot how to shoot when he was with the Lakers. The Bulls dearly need a three-point shooter, and this is whom they’ve come up with for an answer?

If they’re desperate enough to sign Westbrook now, they should have been desperate enough to break up the Big Three at the trade deadline last week. The very idea of adding him to the roster should be an indication to Karnisovas that something is very, very wrong with his team. Westbrook is the universal sign that all is lost and that you might want to get your affairs in order.

LaVine and Westbrook coexisting? It’s hard to imagine.

Westbrook played from 2015 to 2019 for Bulls coach Billy Donovan when both were with Oklahoma City. That included three of the four seasons Westbrook averaged a triple double. That was a different player. Back then, he was difficult for opponents to guard and difficult for teammates to coexist with. Now? He’s not as difficult for opponents.

Donovan has taken great pains to let everyone know how much his players care. Their mediocrity is not a result of apathy, he says. Maybe not, but I think we can all agree that the Bulls are deeply flawed. LaVine, DeRozan and Vucevic are talented players. They aren’t a successful trio, though, and none of the compliments pouring out of Donovan’s mouth have changed that.

Logic is taking a beating these days. It doesn’t follow that, because nothing else has worked for the Bulls, ridiculous is worth a try. Just because the Bulls aren’t winning as much as they should be, it doesn’t follow that Westbrook’s arrival would change that. One thing is certain: There will be an increase in hard feelings. Donovan has his own system and his own offense. Westbrook will smile at it, say something like, “That’s nice,” and do his own thing, which he always does.

Don’t blame him. Blame the Bulls. They’ve earned somebody like him. The players haven’t played up to their ability, and the man in charge of making personnel moves hasn’t adjusted to their failures. That’s how someone like Westbrook enters the conversation. That’s how crazy talk gets normalized.

Enjoy, everybody!

Read More

Russell Westbrook would be punishment for Bulls’ sin of underperforming Read More »

Anyone who follows the Chicago Bears knows that this offseason, the team has a couple of clear areas they need to improve.

General manager Ryan Poles is a former offensive lineman himself, and after watching the way Justin Fields took a beating last season, he has to know his number one priority this spring. It’s without a doubt the offensive line.

Sure, defensive line and wide receiver are an issue, among other positions. But, this offensive line has to be completely overhauled, and that begins in free agency.

Last year, the Bears signed veteran tackle Riley Reiff to a team-friendly deal worth $3 million for one year. Now, Reiff enters free agency once again.

Should the Chicago Bears re-sign offensive tackle Riley Reiff?

The 34-year-old Reiff played in nine meaningful games a year ago for the Bears; meaning, games he played more than 10 snaps in total.

He did fine on occasion, but was nothing more than mediocre on most days. Reiff was okay in pass protection, earning a grade of 67.0 from Pro Football Focus in that area. When it came to run blocking, though, he was less than stellar, earning a grade of just 59.1.

Chicago has one offensive tackle locked-in as a starter for 2023, and it should come as no surprise that it’s second-year pro Braxton Jones. To be frank, the Bears are lucky that Jones worked out so well. As a fifth-round pick, Jones was more of a dart throw by Poles than anything.

Now, with Teven Jenkins likely sticking at guard, the Bears will have a ton of work to do at tackle. But, that cannot include re-signing Reiff. If the Bears were to bring him back on a very team-friendly deal, meaning more of a minimum contract, then he could be a solid depth piece or even just a camp body.

But, overall, the Bears have to get younger up front. Reiff is getting up there in age and the Bears cannot afford to count on him as more than just a reserve going forward, should he actually be re-signed.

Read More

Read More »

Justin Fields names who he wants the Bears to draft and why

Justin Fields wants separation

The Chicago Bears have plenty of options in the upcoming draft. Quarterback Justin Fields has his own opinion on what the team should do with their number one overall pick. The Bears earned the number one pick after a disastrous season where decencies on offense and defense were seen all over the field. The third-year quarterback has keyed on what he thinks would help the offense the most.

Fields was a guest on Pardon My Take Wednesday. They played a game, “you be the GM,” where Fields was the general manager. He was asked who he’d take in the NFL draft if the Bears had three first-round picks from the “Big Cat Deal.” If, of course, Fields didn’t want to trade himself. Fields named his first option.

“I’m going with my man Jaxon Smith-Njigba. You know I’ve seen him in action. I’ve seen how he can separate himself like that,” Fields said, snapping his fingers to illustrate how quickly the Ohio State wide receiver can get separation.

“And his body control is just crazy. He didn’t get to play this past year; he didn’t get to show what he can do, so I’m hoping he falls somehow. But we do have some help that we need in the trenches. A lot of people are talking about us taking Jalen Carter or Will Anderson Jr., so we’ll see what happens. I’m guessing we’ll get one of those guys and maybe some guys in free agency.

Fields wants a teammate

Justin Fields made several interesting comments there. One, he wants a wide receiver who can separate. That’s an issue his receivers corps had during the 2022 season. And he thinks that is more of a problem for the offense than the pass blocking. You’ll notice Fields wanted Smith-Njigba over another former teammate Paris Johnson Jr.

Justin Fields also said Poles would disregard his wishes for the draft help. That’s normal in the NFL. Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers has been frustrated his entire career for not getting wide receiver help in the first round.

But Fields’ request is something general manager Ryan Poles should listen to. Previous college teammate tandems have done well on offense in recent years. Joe Burrow and Ja’Marr Chase, Trevor Lawrence and Travis Etienne Jr. come to mind.

For More Great Chicago Sports Content

Follow us on Twitter at @chicitysports23 for more great content. We appreciate you taking time to read our articles. To interact more with our community and keep up to date on the latest in Chicago sports news, JOIN OUR FREE FACEBOOK GROUP by CLICKING HERE

Read More

Justin Fields names who he wants the Bears to draft and why Read More »

Todd McShay’s mock draft has Chicago Bears moving back but not for a big haul

The Chicago Bears move back in Todd McShay’s latest 2023 NFL mock draft on ESPN

We are still two months away from the 2023 NFL draft and all the talk will continue to surround the Chicago Bears.

The Bears hold the No. 1 pick in the draft but aren’t expected to keep it. Instead, many expect the Bears to trade the No. 1 pick hoping to land more assets in the draft to build the franchise in a key year for a rebuild.

On Wednesday, ESPN analyst Todd McShay released his updated 2023 mock draft and he’s echoing those thoughts of the Bears trading back. McShay has the Indianapolis Colts moving up from No. 4 overall to No. 1 and taking a quarterback. Here is what McShay wrote on the situation including the haul the Bears get back:

Indianapolis has entered each of the past five seasons with a different starting quarterback, opting for veteran options via free agency and trades. But it was No. 27 in Total QBR last season (36.8), and the offense was at the bottom of the NFL in points per game (15.8). GM Chris Ballard will be eager to jump the line to land the top quarterback on the Colts’ board, whomever that ends up being. And the Bears should be listening to offers. They have their quarterback in Justin Fields and can still land a standout defensive player in a trade-back — while also picking up additional draft capital. Matt Miller actually projected the Colts to move up to No. 1 in his mock last week, too. It just makes sense.

The return could come down to just how desperate the QB-needy teams get and how much they fall in love with a specific passer. But I’d expect the Bears to receive something in the ballpark of the No. 4 pick, a second-rounder (No. 35), a fifth-rounder and maybe even an additional Round 1 selection in 2024.

It’s an ideal situation for the Chicago Bears to trade back and Indianapolis feels like a legit candidate. But the haul from McShay feels a little underwhelming.

Chicago gets No. 35 overall as a second round pick plus a fifth-rounder. McShay mentions they could get an addition first rounder. The perfect scenario for Ryan Poles is getting another first rounder next year as it would be a valuable pick to have for next year.

The Chicago Bears would get back the No. 4 pick and they take Georgia defensive tackle Jalen Carter. The defensive tackle would fill a big need for the Bears on the defensive line as Will Anderson went No. 3 to Arizona.

For More Great Chicago Sports Content

Follow us on Twitter at @chicitysports23 for more great content. We appreciate you taking time to read our articles. To interact more with our community and keep up to date on the latest in Chicago sports news, JOIN OUR FREE FACEBOOK GROUP by CLICKING HERE

Read More

Todd McShay’s mock draft has Chicago Bears moving back but not for a big haul Read More »