Videos

The Chicago Cubs did a lot this off-season to try and be an improved team. The biggest move came in the form of their new shortstop Dansby Swanson who earned a very lucrative contract. With Nico Hoerner moving to second base, the Cubs are set in the middle of the infield.

They also added other players that have had great years in their careers like Cody Bellinger, Trey Mancini, Eric Hosmer, and Tucker Barnhart. Most of these guys have won the World Series somewhere else in their careers which means they bring tons of experience.

With Kyle Hendriks being the only one left from the 2016 World Series team, they desperately needed some veteran leadership so they went out and got it. It was a big off-season for them as they try to come back a good team in 2023.

With the aforementioned players in addition to guys like Ian Happ, Seiya Suzuki, and Marcus Stroman on the team, it feels like they have a chance to be decent this year. A lot needs to go right but there is a surplus of talent there this year compared to the last two.

The Chicago Cubs are a team that has mixed expectations coming into 2023.

Baseball Prospectus doesn’t think very highly of them right now though. They currently have the Cubs coming in third place in the NL Central with a record of 77-85. They have the Pittsburgh Pirates coming in fourth at 71-91 and the Cincinnati Reds in last at 67-95.

Ahead of the Cubs in this projection are the two teams that have finished ahead of them a lot in recent years. They, oddly enough, have the Milwaukee Brewers winning the division at 88-74 with the St. Louis Cardinals right behind at 86-76. These are definitely interesting predictions.

Where does your favorite team stand? pic.twitter.com/VNsa25V3OC

— MLB (@MLB) February 18, 2023

With other elite teams in the NL like the Los Angeles Dodgers, San Diego Padres, New York Mets, Atlanta Braves, and Philadelphia Phillies, the NL Central could really only be sending one playoff team again in 2023. That certainly doesn’t help the Cubs.

Playoffs aren’t the issue here though. The issue is the team having an improved year so they need these Baseball Prospectus rankings to be completely wrong for that to be the case.

Read More

Read More »

It’s a slow time of the year for sports in Illinois, with the Cubs, White Sox and Bears in offseason mode and the Bulls off for the NBA All-Star Break.

Thanks to DraftKings Sportsbook, there’s still plenty of reason to bet on your teams this weekend. New users in Illinois who bet $5 on one of their teams this weekend will win $150 in bonus bets if that team wins!

What better time to build your bankroll with so many sporting events left on the calendar? Make sure to follow the instructions below to take advantage of this offer.

DraftKings Illinois Promo

This offer is only available for new users and it won’t be around forever.

Here’s what you do:

Sign up for DraftKings using this link (no promo code needed)Verify your identityDeposit $5 or moreBet at least $5 on any wager this weekend

That’s all you have to do. Once your account is set up and you’ve deposited at least $5, you’re ready for your shot at $150.

There’s a few different ways to play this opportunity. You could bet on the Chicago Blackhawks or the Illinois men’s basketball team. Or maybe you want to bet on some NBA All-Star action.

Whatever your flavor, it doesn’t matter as long as you win.

Turning $5 into $150 has never been easier than this. Sign up with DraftKings now before this offer ends.

Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change.

Read More

Read More »

Gaston Gimenez happy to stay with Fire after signing new contract

During his Fire tenure, Gaston Gimenez’s performance always has been measured against his contract and salary. Signed as a designated player before the 2020 season, Gimenez has been a mainstay in the Fire’s midfield. But critics have argued his production and role haven’t matched his DP status.

This season, Gimenez might be judged by a different standard.

In October, Gimenez and the Fire agreed to a new contract through the 2025 season. Crucially for the Fire, Gimenez is no longer a DP, which might compel some observers to look at the 31-year-old veteran in a different way. Perhaps the things he does well — organizing the midfield, hitting passes to connect the attack to the back line — won’t be overshadowed by the lack of goals, assists and flashy moments that usually define a high-priced DP.

Gimenez’s mindset hasn’t changed, even if his contract has. The contract, Gimenez said, isn’t important. Doing things “the right way” is more crucial.

“I never felt any pressure in my life as far as playing [soccer] goes,” Gimenez said through a translator. “It’s my job. It’s what I do. I take it seriously as my job, as my profession, no matter the contract I have.”

Gimenez, who was somewhat controversially re-signed as a designated player in December 2021 through the 2023 season by sporting director Georg Heitz and technical director Sebastian Pelzer, said his new contract was convenient for the Fire and himself. The team wanted to open a DP spot, and Gimenez and his family are happy in Chicago.

“It really benefitted both of us doing [the new contract] in that way,” said Gimenez, who earned $2,360,667 in guaranteed compensation last year, according to the MLS Players Association. “Money was never an issue, money was never a problem. We’re just really happy here, so we were able to reach that agreement and everyone can be happy.”

When he signed the new contract, Gimenez was a little more than a month removed from season-ending surgery Aug. 24 to repair a right hamstring injury. Now, with the opener March 4 two weeks away, Gimenez said he’s feeling very good and is incrementally getting better physically. But on Friday, coach Ezra Hendrickson said Gimenez is dealing with an unspecified injury that could be caused by overcompensating for the hamstring, and wouldn’t commit to him being available for the opener.

Besides his fitness, where Gimenez fits in Hendrickson’s lineup also will be worth watching as the season gets going.

Pending injuries, Federico Navar-ro seems entrenched in one of the Fire’s deep-lying midfield slots. To pair with Navarro, the Fire have options that include Mauricio Pineda, Fabian Herbers and the intriguing possibility of using young designated player Jairo Torres deeper in the formation.

Rather than fretting about the potential competition, Gimenez said it’s a good thing for the Fire to have choices in the midfield.

And regardless of how many minutes he gets, Gimenez knows his role will stay the same: arrange the midfield, communicate and give “100% every day.”

“That’s what’s important,” he said. “First is the team, and after that is everything on an individual level.”

Read More

Gaston Gimenez happy to stay with Fire after signing new contract Read More »

Baseball quiz: ‘Come on down!’

It’s not just because I’m jealous of quizmasters who have their own televised programs, but I have to admit that it has been ages since I watched a game show.

Back in the day, I enjoyed watching “The Price is Right.” The show first aired from 1956 to 1963 on NBC, hosted by Bill Cullen with the great Don Pardo as the announcer. When the show moved to ABC, from 1963 to 65, Johnny Gilbert became the announcer. The newest and most famous version of the show premiered Sept. 4, 1972, on CBS. Bob Barker was the host until his retirement in June 2007, when Drew Carey took over.

Barker was as charming as he could be as contestants were put to the test in a wide variety of pricing games. Today, our quiz pays homage to what I call the Over-Under Game. This is the time of year when betting establishments put out their predictions for the coming baseball season. They use betting lines that are so damn close to being right that one seemingly can’t win.

For example, DraftKings says the White Sox will win 83.5 games and the Cubs 77.5, and you can bet whether they’ll win more or fewer games. We aren’t predicting in our game, but you get a correct answer by knowing the over or the under. You’ll see as we get started. So have fun and learn a lot. And please, no wagering.

1. Let’s start with an easy recollection of the 2022 season. Combined, did the White Sox and Cubs win over or under 150.5 games?

2. In 2021 and 2022, did Jose Abreu drive home over or under 192.5 RBI?

3. On July 30, 2021, Kris Bryant was traded by the Cubs to the Giants for Alexander Canario and Caleb Kilian. Since Aug. 1, 2021, have the Cubs started over or under 9.5 different third basemen?

4. Last season, Aaron Judge hit 62 home runs. Was the total of homers hit by Patrick -Wisdom, Ian Happ, Christopher Morel and Nick -Madrigal over or under Judge’s total?

5. Last season, the White Sox had 1,005 -singles. Was that over every postseason team? Or under even one postseason team?

6. Last season, the Cubs won 74 games. Over the last 10 seasons combined (2013-2022), have the Bears won over or under that total?

7. Last season, the White Sox finished with a record of 81-81. In their history, how many other times have the Sox finished with a .500 record? Over or under 4.5 times?

8. Ryne Sandberg played 15 seasons with the Cubs. How many of those seasons did “Ryno” have more hits than strikeouts? The over/under is 13.5.

9. I like to end with a question about walk-offs or closers. No closer in White Sox history has had more seasons with 25-plus saves than Bobby Jenks. How many seasons did he have 35-plus saves? The over/under is 2.5.

I close with Bob Barker’s closing to each show: “Help control the pet population. Have your pets spayed or neutered.” Might I add, don’t use the phrase “get your pet fixed.” There had been nothing broken. Have a good week.

ANSWERS

1. OVER. The Sox won 81 and the Cubs 74. A total of 155.

2. UNDER. Abreu drove home 117 in 2021 and 75 in 2022 for a total of 192 RBI.

3. UNDER. The Cubs started seven different players at third base: Patrick Wisdom (134 games), Matt Duffy (25), Zach McKinstry and Christopher Morel (16 each), David Bote (15), Jonathan Villar (11) and P.J. Higgins (2).

4. UNDER. Wisdom hit 25, Happ 17, Morel 16 and Madrigal didn’t hit any. That puts the total at 58 homers.

5. OVER. The Sox led the majors in singles last season.

6. UNDER. The Bears have won 64 games. But over the last 11 seasons, the Bears have won 74 games, the same as the Cubs’ total last season.

7. UNDER. The Sox also finished at .500 in 1922, 1941, 1974 and 2002.

8. OVER. Sandberg finished his career with 2,386 hits and 1,260 strikeouts. Every season he played with the Cubs, he had more hits than whiffs.

9. UNDER. The Sox’ record for seasons with 35-plus saves is two, held by Jenks, Roberto Hernandez and Liam Hendriks, who’s undergoing treatment for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. There are specially designed “Close Out Cancer” T-shirts for sale for $31 at whitesox.com/TeamLiam. Net proceeds from the sale will benefit the Lymphoma Research Foundation (LRF) and its mission to eradicate lymphoma and serve those impacted by the blood cancer. This month, I lost one of my oldest and dearest friends to lymphoma, and I bought a T-shirt in Mitchell’s memory.

Read More

Baseball quiz: ‘Come on down!’ Read More »

Russell Westbrook to Bulls? Here’s your vote

Russell Westbrook to the Bulls?

It might happen.

What could go wrong?

If the 34-year-old point guard separates from the Jazz via a buyout of his expiring $47.1 million contract, he’ll be looking to play somewhere. In this week’s “Polling Place,” your home for Sun-Times sports polls on Twitter, we wanted to know if Chicago — whose Bulls are, ahem, bad — is the right place.

“Likely more entertaining to watch on — and off — the court than what we’re getting right now,” @CalJestice commented.

“Yes,” @Midwestman21 offered, “because the team obviously needs to completely burn to the ground to get the front office to notice that it isn’t working.”

But more voters said no — as did a majority about baseball’s “ghost runner” rule, which puts a man on second base to start extra innings and has become a permanent deal.

“Get rid of it,” @bigcubstweets wrote, getting straight to the point.

Last, we asked: Which hoops squad is better built for March, Illinois or Northwestern?

On to the polls:

Poll No. 1: Should the Bulls acquire Russell Westbrook if they can?

Upshot: Again, what could go wrong? Probably everything, although, given the hopelessness of this team, it might be more like nothing. Or as @FatDudeRunning put it, “I was going to cite dysfunction, but he would fit in perfectly with this poorly constructed team, adding to the overall dysfunction.” It could be just crazy enough to (not) work.

Poll No. 2: What do you think of major league baseball’s extra-inning “ghost runner” rule?

Upshot: @KurtisArndt wishes the rule were “just implemented in the 13th inning instead of the 10th,” an interesting take. Alas, it’s water under the bridge now; there will be a runner on second in the 10th whether we like it or not. Kind of like a round of ice-cold beers at the ballpark costs $1.2 billion whether we like it or not.

Poll No. 3: Which college basketball team is a better bet to make some noise in March, Illinois or Northwestern?

Upshot: “Illinois is capable but inconsistent,” @DouglasVankleek wrote, “but Northwestern has shown it can win on the road.” It’s true — the Wildcats have been road warriors. But will their terrific chemistry and clutch ways add up to more in the Big Dance than all that Illini talent? The big stage awaits.

Read More

Russell Westbrook to Bulls? Here’s your vote Read More »

How to gamble on Major League Baseball

LAS VEGAS — As I crouched over to grab two cans of black olives last week, a fellow grocer mumbled something. I said, ”Excuse me?”

“How will them O’s do this season?”

After a tick or two, I remembered I was wearing an Orioles home cap — white front, orange bill, the smiling little bird wearing a little black cap with the cursive O’s on the front.

Them beautiful Baltimore Orioles.

”Well,” I said, ”as long as they keep paying dividends.”

He hailed from Washington, has enjoyed the Nationals-Orioles rivalry and didn’t quite get my response. I grinned like that little bird as I explained that Baltimore proved pivotal to my marginally profitable MLB 2022 season.

The Orioles barely finished above .500 at 83-79. However, because so many of their victories arrived as an underdog, they netted a league-best 27.2 profit units.

I nabbed the cap as a tribute.

Underdogs? No. These were The Fabulous Underbirds.

They zapped bookmakers, along with the Dodgers on the run line, and parlays involving L.A., Houston, the Yankees and Mets.

Rampart Casino race and sports director Duane Colucci told me his book did finish in the black with baseball, the cushion just wasn’t as large as usual. Plus, one of those months had indeed been a rare loser.

“One of our worst baseball seasons ever,” he said. “Uncanny. Brutal.”

ROAD PROFITS

On the moneyline, the Guardians (18.1 units), Astros (13.6), Mets (12) and Mariners (10.7), according to OddsShark.com, followed Baltimore in winning double-digit profits.

On the run line — giving 1.5 runs — the Dodgers were devastating as 97 of their 111 victories came by at least two runs, dominance that returned 29.2 units of profit.

(A Dodgers’ moneyline of -250 could be whittled to -115 on the run line.)

“That trend killed us,” Colucci said. “It was brutal because they have the most backing in Las Vegas — maybe until the A’s come here, if they come here.

“But everybody bets on the Dodgers, and a lot of people have grown to bet on the Astros, as well, because they rule that [AL] West year in and year out.”

Blindly betting the Cubs and White Sox at home would have been bad deals. Both went 37-44, but the former dropped a mere 4.9 units; the latter’s typical favored status meant more risk, and a 16-unit loss.

Both would’ve been wise road wagers, though, the Cubs making 6.9 units, while the Sox made 7.8.

Chicago baseball supporters needed to pick their spots, though, since the Sox fared well away from home for three trips, from mid-June on, and again in September. In mid-August and September, the Cubs were road warriors.

For this season, William Hill has set a victory total of 77.5 on the Cubs, 35-to-1 odds on them winning the NL pennant, 75-1 on the World Series; the White Sox total is 83, 16-1 to win the AL, 28-1 the series.

At DraftKings, the Cubs are 80-1 to win it all, 35-1 for the Sox, who for the first time in 10 years will not have slugger Jose Abreu, who is now in Houston.

Colucci said notable money has been wagered on the Cubs, whose new players include starting pitcher Jameson Taillon and shortstop Dansby Swanson.

On Long Island, professional bettor Tom Barton said interest in the Cubs might be “a little overblown,” but he does believe .500 is within reach — Over 77.5 might be wise.

The Cubs are +700 (risk $100 to win $700) to take the NL Central, behind the Cardinals (-110) and Brewers +140), at the Westgate SuperBook.

“I think that’s a winnable division,” Barton said, “but I’m not sure the Cubs did enough.”

DIAMOND ANGLES

I know some sharp bettors who wait till Memorial Day, to get a feel for new rosters and rule changes, to bet on baseball.

Barton generally agreed with that tack, but he doesn’t want to miss early profits, either.

He likes the Pirates to go over a team victory total that he got at 63, which is 67.5 (Over -105, Under -115) at DraftKings.

“I’m hot on them this season,” Barton said. “No matter what they do, they’ll always be dogs and you don’t want to miss the big payouts early on.”

For the NL Cy Young Award, he got Brewers starter Brandon Woodruff at 50-1 (he’s 35-1 at DraftKings) for its sheer value.

Barton also snatched the Braves’ Austin Riley for NL MVP at 12-1 (15-1 DK) and said Riley to lead the NL in homers (13-1 DK) “is worth a stab.” He grabbed the Mariners’ Julio Rodriguez at 12-1 for AL MVP (7-1 DK).

“And I think the Angels make the playoffs,” Barton said. At DK, that proposition is +190 on Yes, No -225. They boast superstars Shohei Ohtani (+200 AL MVP odds at DK) and Mike Trout (+450).

(Odds and prices subject to change.)

I wore that Orioles cap Monday to shop at a sportsbook, and the ticket writer erupted. A Baltimore native, he raved about the team’s young talent.

The franchise has a history, too. Over the last 10 full seasons, according to the Covers.com database, the Orioles have turned in three of the nine most-profitable campaigns, netting 36.5 units in 2012 and 31.6 in ’14.

If they continue being the Underbirds, I’ll be grabbing an all-black Baltimore away cap — of course, with the little grinning Oriole on the front — come next winter.

Read More

How to gamble on Major League Baseball Read More »

Ferguson Jenkins: Keep your eyes on the Cubs legend

LAS VEGAS — Runners had been in scoring position for both games when it had mattered most, at the very end, but nobody could produce a clutch hit.

Two defeats for Fergie Jenkins.

“We lost 17-16, then 10-8,” he said. “We needed one more hit.”

His first two games as a professional player, for the Phillies’ Class-D Miami Marlins in 1962? His first two games as a Cub, in 1966?

No. This was Jan. 25, at the faux Wrigley Field here at the Field of Dreams complex.

Late the next morning, as the other two teams battled in the Club 400 charity fantasy camp and a chill blew in from right field, Jenkins settled into the comfortable indoor seating area and snack bar behind home plate.

The 80-year-old Cubs legend laughed easily and frequently, but he also spoke about these games as if they mattered, as if his roster of weekend warriors, in their 40s and 50s, would expect nothing less.

“They want to compete,” Jenkins said. “It takes willpower to push their bodies a little farther. They see me try to coach them in the correct ways, to try to win the ‘inner’ part of the game.”

He had tried conveying fundamental aspects of the game, like hitting the proper cutoff man from the outfield, not swinging at eye-high or ankle-low pitches from the machine.

“It’s a little tough,” Jenkins laughed.

That day, though, something clicked. They executed. Jenkins and co-coach Ed Lynch guided their band of middle-aged misfits to the fantasy championship.

EASING BURDENS

Stewart McVicar started Club 400, a takeoff on Wrigley Field’s center-field sign, in 2014, and he has taken the fantasy baton from founder and former Cubs catcher Randy Hundley.

At $2,500 per camper, nearly everything but airfare is covered.

Lee Smith and Bob Dernier coached one team, the other was overseen by Ray Burris and John Mallee, a graduate of Mount Carmel, Chicago State and UIC.

Every coach possessed a Cubs connection.

McVicar, 49, operates an HVAC business in Lake in the Hills, where the 2,300-square-foot basement of his nearby home serves as a shrine to the franchise and Club 400’s headquarters.

Jenkins cut his usual such fee considerably. He has been in McVicar’s grand basement, as have Andre Dawson, Anthony Rizzo and other former Cubs, team owner Tom Ricketts and other athletes.

In April 2021, Nicole Geu sought aid for close friend Heather Howiler, a Naperville teacher with a terminal illness. Geu found an ally in McVicar, who deals directly with people to avoid typical red-tape delays.

Within 48 hours, Heather had four choice seats to a Cubs game. She appeared on the big screen. Players strolled by to chat, sign autographs, take photos.

“For a few hours she wasn’t a cancer fighter, she was a Cubs fan,” Geu said. “It meant the world to her.”

Five weeks later, Howiler died. Her memory lives in Geu’s Honoring Heather program, and Geu now does accounting and public-relations work for Club 400.

Thirty-five Club 400 events have raised more than $750,000, and McVicar welcomes donations and sponsorships.

“You can ease burdens,” he said. “It’s about Cubs fans helping Cubs fans. I didn’t know how it would go, trying to get players to come to events in my basement. Now, they want to come to us.”

THE WINNER

Fergie Jenkins never took competition for granted. At 16, in his hometown of Chatham, Ontario, a Phillies scout dropped by the ice rink to watch him play hockey.

The scout first asked him why he was so violent? Jenkins replied that he was a defenseman, so he’d prevent anyone crossing that blue line from scoring, either with his stick or his 6-4 frame, even more imposing on skates.

He also spent three seasons playing hoops with Fred “Curly” Neal, Meadowlark Lemon and Jackie Jackson on the Harlem Globetrotters.

“I had a chance to portray certain aspects of what I was capable of doing, and I was capable of playing several different sports.”

He laughed.

“As long as I didn’t get hurt.”

He won 284 major-league games, and the National Baseball Hall of Fame made him immortal in 1991.

From 1967 through ’72, a much different and durable era, he completed 140 games for the Cubs, recording 127 triumphs. Since 1998, only six pitchers have recorded at least 10 complete games in a season.

“Pitchers are protected, for some reason,” Jenkins said. “If you’re in great shape, why should you protect an athlete?”

Meantime, every offseason, the powers keep tweaking the game Jenkins adores. This year there’s a pitch clock, the bases are bigger and two infielders must occupy either side of second base.

“The timing part I dislike. The pitcher sets the tempo; that belongs to him. We don’t need a clock in baseball.”

The robot ump being implemented in every Triple-A park doesn’t inform Jenkins that it’s imminent for the majors.

“I don’t think it’ll get to the big leagues. I just think that the umpire is correct 99% of the time. Replay has helped, in some respect. But I enjoy seeing an ump call balls and strikes.”

Always, Jenkins insisted, the reward is winning.

“And you win as a team, not an individual.”

It was as true in 1962, at Class-D Miami, as it was on a rough patch of grass in Las Vegas in late January.

Read More

Ferguson Jenkins: Keep your eyes on the Cubs legend Read More »

QB frenzy could reap Bears a draft windfall

Even with the Bears unlikely to use the No. 1 overall draft pick on a quarterback, the Super Bowl was good to them in relation to this year’s draft.

The Chiefs’ Patrick Mahomes was the Super Bowl MVP despite throwing for only 182 yards, and the Eagles’ Jalen Hurts was outstanding in defeat, with 304 passing yards and three rushing touchdowns in the 38-35 loss.

Anything that promotes the notion that a good young quarterback can make a difference is good for the Bears, who are counting on a quarterback frenzy to create a bidding war for the No. 1 pick that nets them a bonanza of draft picks.

With the Bengals’ Joe Burrow, the Bills’ Josh Allen and perhaps the Ravens’ Lamar Jackson added to that mix, young quarterbacks are making a bigger impact in recent years. The quarterbacks in the conference championship games and the Super Bowl all were 27 or younger — Mahomes (27), Hurts (24), Burrow (26) and 49ers rookie Brock Purdy (23).

It marked the first time the starting quarterbacks of the final four teams in the NFL postseason were under 30 since 2010. This year’s quartet’s average age of 25 is the lowest in the Super Bowl era. The previous 10 seasons, it was 31.0.

Perception is important but so is timing. The draft had highly rated quarterback classes in 2020 (when Burrow, Tua Tagovailoa and Justin Herbert went 1-5-6) and 2021 (when Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance and Justin Fields went 1-2-3-11). But last year the Bears would have been out of luck, with no quarterback rated worthy of a top-10 pick.

Even modest expectations in February mock drafts last year were way off. ESPN’s post-Super Bowl mock draft had four quarterbacks going in the first round — Pittsburgh’s Kenny Pickett (11th), Liberty’s Malik Willis (17th), Mississippi’s Matt Corral (18th) and North Carolina’s Sam Howell (32nd).

As it turned out, only Pickett went in the first round (20th to the Steelers). Willis and Corral ended up going in the third round. Howell went in the fifth round.

This year’s quarterback draft class, which doesn’t include anyone as touted as Lawrence or Burrow, is still considered to be much closer to 2020 and 2021 than last year, with draft projections that figure to hold up better as well.

That’s good news for the Bears. Alabama’s Bryce Young is still rated the top quarterback and the No. 1 overall pick by a team that is looking for a quarterback. And Ohio State’s C.J. Stroud and Kentucky’s Will Levis are still considered potential top-two picks heading into the most important phases of the draft process — the NFL scouting combine on Feb. 26-March 2 in Indianapolis, the college pro days and the individual “Top 30” interviews.

Things still have to fall into place for the Bears to reap a windfall. Ironically, what they need most is for a general manager to fall in love with Young, Stroud or Levis as much as former Bears GM Ryan Pace became smitten by North Carolina’s Mitch Trubisky in 2017. Pace, regrettably, was so resolute about Trubisky he traded four picks to the 49ers to move up from No. 3 to No. 2 because he feared (and claimed he had back-channel intel) that another team might leapfrog him to get Trubisky.

Even if it’s not to that degree, it’s that kind of competitive dynamic that will drive the best deal. The Colts continue to be the team most likely to do business with the Bears. They need a quarterback. And they have the No. 4 pick — a critical element that would allow the Bears to trade down and still get either Georgia defensive tackle Jalen Carter or Alabama defensive end Will Anderson.

And the Colts also have — inadvertently or purposely — tipped their hand a bit. When general manager Chris Ballard was asked at his postseason press conference in January if he would “move heaven and earth” to get the quarterback he wanted, Ballard said, ‘Yes. I’d do whatever it takes.”

That scenario was strengthened this week when the Colts named Eagles offensive coordinator Shane Steichen as their head coach. Steichen, 37, has a reputation as a quarterback-developer — he coached Herbert in 2020 with the Chargers and has worked with Hurts the past two seasons with the Eagles.

And Colts owner Jim Irsay added fuel to the Colts-Bears speculation when he said he leaned toward an offensive-minded head coach, “knowing we’re going to have to find a young quarterback to develop.”

The Colts still could get their young quarterback at No. 4. But knowing two quarterbacks figure to be gone by then — whoever gets the Bears No. 1 pick and the Texans at No. 2 — they’re more likely to enter the bidding war than stand on the sidelines.

It remains to be seen if that bidding war will become a frenzy, but with quarterbacks and NFL personnel departments, anything is possible. The Texans, Colts and Panthers are teams most obviously looking for a quarterback. And there are several teams that play it coy but might be ready to snipe — the Jets, Raiders, Commanders, Saints, Falcons and Titans among them.

That’s why many reputable mock drafts have the Bears dealing the No. 1 pick. NFL.com‘s Chad Reuter, in fact, had the dream scenario at the top of his mock draft released this week — the Bears trading down with the Texans (for No. 2, No. 74 and a 2024 first-round pick, with the Bears throwing in a 2023 fifth-round pick), then trading down again with the Colts (for the No. 4, No. 36, plus 2024 second- and third-round picks).

In that scenario, the Bears likely would get Jalen Carter or Will Anderson — plus a second- and third-round pick this year and a first-, second- and third-round pick in 2024.

The Bears’ fortune isn’t expected to be that good. And the worst-case scenario also looms — that Young’s stock drops during the combine/pro day stage of the draft process, the Colts are willing to take whatever quarterback is left at No. 4, nobody’s that desperate and the Bears are “stuck” with the No. 1 pick. They still get a premier prospect in Carter or Anderson, but the way the winds are blowing in February, that would be a disappointment.

More than likely, it will end up somewhere between those extremes, with a possible critical dilemma for Poles if the Texans at No. 2 or the Colts at No. 4 won’t play ball: Is it worth it to give up Carter or Anderson to trade down for more picks?

With as much background and film-work as personnel departments have done, the next phase of the draft process is critical. Even little things can make a difference. Will Young be 5-11 or 6-0 in his official measurement at the combine? Who interviews well and who doesn’t? Who clicks with whom?

It’s all part of an inexact process. And unless someone blows away the Bears and becomes a better option than Fields, all they have to do is wait for someone to fall in love with a quarterback, and let human nature do the rest.

Read More

QB frenzy could reap Bears a draft windfall Read More »

The great sports stadium scam

Since we’ve just watched this year’s Super Bowl, this is a good time to remind ourselves that billionaires have found one more way to fleece the public: sports stadiums. And if we don’t play ball, they’ll take our favorite teams away.

Ever notice how there never seems to be enough money to build public infrastructure like mass transit lines and better schools? Yet when a multi-billion-dollar sports team demands a new stadium, our local governments are happy to oblige.

SEND LETTERS TO: [email protected]. We want to hear from our readers. To be considered for publication, letters must include your full name, your neighborhood or hometown and a phone number for verification purposes. Letters should be a maximum of approximately 350 words.

A good example is the new Sox Park (now Guaranteed Rate Field), which opened in 1991. Sox owners threatened to leave Chicago unless they got taxpayer help to build a new stadium. The threat worked: Taxpayers got stuck with a renovation-related bill of $430 million.

Same for the disgraceful disfiguring of Soldier Field. Taxpayers still owe $631.5 million, and it will not be fully paid off until 2032.

State Farm Stadium in Arizona, home of this year’s Super Bowl, was built based on the owner’s threat to move the team. Arizona taxpayers were stuck with a huge bill.

Since 1990, franchises in major North American sports leagues have received billions in taxpayer subsidies from state and local governments to build stadiums.

These team owners always try to sell their projects by claiming the new stadiums will increase economic growth. But research has shown that benefits are mainly realized by team owners alone.

So, these taxpayer subsidies help the rich get richer, while our schools and other infrastructure fall apart. Is this what we want?

Bob Chimis, Elmwood Park

SAFE-T Act fails to protect the innocent

Sixty-four Illinois counties sued to keep criminal justice reforms known as the Safety, Accountability, Fairness and Equity-Today (SAFE-T) Act from being implemented — an unprecedented amount of pushback for a bill. The Illinois Supreme Court responded by postponing the bill’s abolition of cash bail, and for good reason.

The SAFE-T Act, signed by Gov. J.B. Pritzker in 2021, aimed to create a more equitable criminal justice system. However, by pushing for the end of cash bail, the new law threatens the safety of law-abiding citizens for the benefit of criminal suspects.

This isn’t the first time the bail system has been on the chopping block, as detailed in a recent Manhattan Institute report. In 2017, Cook County Chief Judge Timothy Evans unilaterally altered how judges determine bail, basing it on the presumption of immediate release of defendants back into the community.

Within 15 months, the number of felony defendants released with no bail almost doubled, from 26.5% to 52%.

Those released on bond for a pending felony case have caused more havoc in the streets: 91 people have been murdered, 98 were victims of attempted murder, and 12 defendants have been charged with attempted murder of a police officer.

Current estimates show that at least 273 people have been killed or injured by individuals free on bail — a far cry from Evans’ claim that no horrible incidents have occurred under the court’s bond reform initiative.

Reforms have also led to a huge increase in those placed on electronic monitoring, which has been linked to a tendency toward more criminal activity. One news investigation found 1,264 felony defendants on electronic monitoring were charged with new crimes over a 17-month period, including murder, attempted murder, armed robbery and a variety of gun and drug charges.

Unfortunately, these victims have gone unnoticed by those now pushing for even more radical reforms in the SAFE-T Act. The underlying motivation is a longstanding, misplaced benevolence toward criminal suspects. It’s time to consider the well-being of law-abiding citizens and seek an equitable criminal justice system that protects the innocent first and foremost.

John Paul Wright, professor, School of Criminal Justice, University of CincinnatiLeah Thomas, senior press officer, Manhattan Institute

Landmarking alone won’t protect sacred spaces

On behalf of our organization, Save the Shrine, we are writing to thank you for your editorial in support of greater protections for Chicago’s historic sacred spaces. Our work at the Shrine of Christ the King in Woodlawn informs our awareness of the critical role historic sacred spaces fill in Chicago’s neighborhoods as community anchors, centers of social life and service and cultural continuity.

We appreciate your drawing awareness to the critical role of landmarking as a tool for the city to encourage responsible decision-making around historic religious structures. We are grateful for the 2003 landmark status afforded to the Shrine of Christ the King, formerly St. Gelasius and St. Clara.

We want to draw attention to some of the limits of landmarking alone in safeguarding these community treasures.

All Masses and sacraments have been suspended at the Shrine following the Archdiocese of Chicago’s suppression of the Institute of Christ the King in its jurisdiction.

This decision and its consequences demonstrates that even with landmark protections, the discretionary actions of religious organizations can threaten preservation efforts.

Jennifer Blackman, managing director, and Emily Nielsen, board president, Save the Shrine

Read More

The great sports stadium scam Read More »

The great sports stadium scam

Since we’ve just watched this year’s Super Bowl, this is a good time to remind ourselves that billionaires have found one more way to fleece the public: sports stadiums. And if we don’t play ball, they’ll take our favorite teams away.

Ever notice how there never seems to be enough money to build public infrastructure like mass transit lines and better schools? Yet when a multi-billion-dollar sports team demands a new stadium, our local governments are happy to oblige.

SEND LETTERS TO: [email protected]. We want to hear from our readers. To be considered for publication, letters must include your full name, your neighborhood or hometown and a phone number for verification purposes. Letters should be a maximum of approximately 350 words.

A good example is the new Sox Park (now Guaranteed Rate Field), which opened in 1991. Sox owners threatened to leave Chicago unless they got taxpayer help to build a new stadium. The threat worked: Taxpayers got stuck with a renovation-related bill of $430 million.

Same for the disgraceful disfiguring of Soldier Field. Taxpayers still owe $631.5 million, and it will not be fully paid off until 2032.

State Farm Stadium in Arizona, home of this year’s Super Bowl, was built based on the owner’s threat to move the team. Arizona taxpayers were stuck with a huge bill.

Since 1990, franchises in major North American sports leagues have received billions in taxpayer subsidies from state and local governments to build stadiums.

These team owners always try to sell their projects by claiming the new stadiums will increase economic growth. But research has shown that benefits are mainly realized by team owners alone.

So, these taxpayer subsidies help the rich get richer, while our schools and other infrastructure fall apart. Is this what we want?

Bob Chimis, Elmwood Park

SAFE-T Act fails to protect the innocent

Sixty-four Illinois counties sued to keep criminal justice reforms known as the Safety, Accountability, Fairness and Equity-Today (SAFE-T) Act from being implemented — an unprecedented amount of pushback for a bill. The Illinois Supreme Court responded by postponing the bill’s abolition of cash bail, and for good reason.

The SAFE-T Act, signed by Gov. J.B. Pritzker in 2021, aimed to create a more equitable criminal justice system. However, by pushing for the end of cash bail, the new law threatens the safety of law-abiding citizens for the benefit of criminal suspects.

This isn’t the first time the bail system has been on the chopping block, as detailed in a recent Manhattan Institute report. In 2017, Cook County Chief Judge Timothy Evans unilaterally altered how judges determine bail, basing it on the presumption of immediate release of defendants back into the community.

Within 15 months, the number of felony defendants released with no bail almost doubled, from 26.5% to 52%.

Those released on bond for a pending felony case have caused more havoc in the streets: 91 people have been murdered, 98 were victims of attempted murder, and 12 defendants have been charged with attempted murder of a police officer.

Current estimates show that at least 273 people have been killed or injured by individuals free on bail — a far cry from Evans’ claim that no horrible incidents have occurred under the court’s bond reform initiative.

Reforms have also led to a huge increase in those placed on electronic monitoring, which has been linked to a tendency toward more criminal activity. One news investigation found 1,264 felony defendants on electronic monitoring were charged with new crimes over a 17-month period, including murder, attempted murder, armed robbery and a variety of gun and drug charges.

Unfortunately, these victims have gone unnoticed by those now pushing for even more radical reforms in the SAFE-T Act. The underlying motivation is a longstanding, misplaced benevolence toward criminal suspects. It’s time to consider the well-being of law-abiding citizens and seek an equitable criminal justice system that protects the innocent first and foremost.

John Paul Wright, professor, School of Criminal Justice, University of CincinnatiLeah Thomas, senior press officer, Manhattan Institute

Landmarking alone won’t protect sacred spaces

On behalf of our organization, Save the Shrine, we are writing to thank you for your editorial in support of greater protections for Chicago’s historic sacred spaces. Our work at the Shrine of Christ the King in Woodlawn informs our awareness of the critical role historic sacred spaces fill in Chicago’s neighborhoods as community anchors, centers of social life and service and cultural continuity.

We appreciate your drawing awareness to the critical role of landmarking as a tool for the city to encourage responsible decision-making around historic religious structures. We are grateful for the 2003 landmark status afforded to the Shrine of Christ the King, formerly St. Gelasius and St. Clara.

We want to draw attention to some of the limits of landmarking alone in safeguarding these community treasures.

All Masses and sacraments have been suspended at the Shrine following the Archdiocese of Chicago’s suppression of the Institute of Christ the King in its jurisdiction.

This decision and its consequences demonstrates that even with landmark protections, the discretionary actions of religious organizations can threaten preservation efforts.

Jennifer Blackman, managing director, and Emily Nielsen, board president, Save the Shrine

Read More

The great sports stadium scam Read More »