NEW YORK — A judge began instructing the jury at R. Kelly’s sex trafficking trial on the law Friday after it heard a prosecutor give a fiery rebuttal to the defense’s closing arguments, which portrayed him as a victim of false accusations.
Kelly “believed the music, the fame and the celebrity meant he could do whatever he wanted,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nadia Shihata said in federal court in Brooklyn.
But, she added, “He’s not a genius, he’s a criminal. A predator.” She added that his alleged victims “aren’t groupies or gold diggers. They’re human beings.”
After Shihata finished, U.S. District Judge Ann Donnelly started her final instructions in anticipation jurors would get the case later in the day.
The 54-year-old Kelly, perhaps best known for the 1996 smash hit “I Believe I Can Fly, ” has pleaded not guilty to racketeering charges accusing him of abusing women, girls and boys for more than two decades.
He is also charged with multiple violations of the Mann Act, which makes it illegal to transport anyone across state lines “for any immoral purpose.”
Prosecutors say their evidence proves how Kelly, with the help of some loyal members of his entourage, used tactics from “the predator playbook” to sexually exploit his victims.
New to the R. Kelly case?
Need a refresher on what’s happened so far?
Check out these links for everything you need to know about Kelly’s federal trial in Brooklyn.
The tactics included isolating them in hotel rooms or his recording studio, subjecting them to degrading rules like making them call him “Daddy” and shooting video recordings — some seen by the jury at trial — of them having sex with him and others as a means to control them, prosecutors said.
In his closing, defense attorney Deveraux Cannick told the jury that testimony by several accusers was full of lies, and that “the government let them lie.”
Cannick argued there was no evidence Kelly’s accusers were never forced to do anything against their will. Instead, Cannick said, Kelly’s girlfriends stuck around because he spoiled them with free air travel, shopping sprees and fancy dinners — treatment that belied the predator label.
“He gave them a lavish lifestyle,” he said. “That’s not what a predator is supposed to do.”
If you’ve noticed that a certain loopy, line-drawn breast motif has become as boob-iquitous as color-coded bookshelves to the millennial aesthetic, you’re onto something: The last few years have seen a noticeable lift in busty fashion and decor. Here in Chicago, it’s a trend that dates back to 2015, the year of Dallas Maynard’s boob ring. “When I first made it, I just thought it was cute,” recalls the local jewelry designer. “Who doesn’t love boobs?” The ring, a solid gold bosom-shaped band studded with sparkling gemstone “nipples” (including ruby, emerald, sapphire, and citrine), was picked up by Chicago retailer Asrai Garden. “When they shared it on social media, it literally broke their Instagram,” says Maynard. Six years later, the concept has evolved into a jewelry collection and a serious symbol of empowerment that resonates with breast cancer patients and survivors, feminists, body positivity activists, nursing mothers, and boob-o-philes alike. From $260. dallasmaynard.com
NEW YORK — A veteran TV news executive says CNN anchor Chris Cuomo sexually harassed her by squeezing her buttocks at a party in 2005.
Shelley Ross said in an opinion piece in The New York Times on Friday that Chris Cuomo, who had formerly reported to her at ABC News, greeted her with a bear hug “while lowering one hand to firmly grab and squeeze the cheek of my buttock” while she was at a party with her husband.
Ross said Cuomo told her, “I can do this now that you’re no longer my boss,” and she responded, “No you can’t,” pushing him off while stepping back to reveal her husband, who had witnessed the episode.
Cuomo sent an email shortly afterward saying he was “ashamed.” He mentioned a celebrity who had been arrested for similar behavior recently, and apologized to Ross and her husband.
Asked for comment, Cuomo told the Times, “As Shelley acknowledges, our interaction was not sexual in nature. It happened 16 years ago in a public setting when she was a top executive at ABC. I apologized to her then, and I meant it.”
Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, has denied touching any of the women inappropriately.
Chris Cuomo told CNN viewers last month that he had advised his brother to be contrite. “I was there to listen and offer my take,” Cuomo said. “And my advice to my brother was simple and consistent — own what you did, tell people what you’ll try to do to be better, be contrite. Finally, accept that it doesn’t matter what you intended, what matters is how your actions and your words are perceived.”
Ross said in her essay in the Times that Chris Cuomo should have been ashamed for his conduct with her, “But my question today is the same as it was then: Was he ashamed of what he did, or was he embarrassed because my husband saw it?”
She said she sees the apology as “an attempt to provide himself with legal and moral coverage to evade accountability.”
Asked for comment about Ross’ essay on Friday, a CNN spokesperson referred to Cuomo’s statement to the Times.
Ross has written previously of being sexually harassed by Roger Ailes, who was ousted from Fox News Channel over harassment complaints and died in 2017.
Recounting the 1981 encounter in her New York Times piece, Ross said Ailes apologized to her for insisting on a “sexual alliance” as a condition of a pending job offer at NBC’s “Tomorrow” show.
Ross said she accepted Ailes’ apology, naively thinking she could “help reform the workplace one predator at a time.”
Ross said she is not asking for Chris Cuomo to be fired from CNN, but would like to see him “journalistically repent: agree on air to study the impact of sexism, harassment and gender bias in the workplace, including his own, and then report on it.”
She suggested a series of town hall meetings titled “The Continuing Education of Chris Cuomo.”
CLEVELAND – SEPTEMBER 23: Jose Abreu #79 of the Chicago White Sox celebrates clinching the American League Central title following the second game of a doubleheader against the Cleveland Indians on September 23, 2021 at Progressive Field in Cleveland, Ohio. The White Sox clinched the American League Central title by wining the first game of the doubleheader. (Photo by Ron Vesely/Getty Images)
The Chicago White Sox are the champions of the 2021 American League Central. They are AL Central champions for the first time since 2008 and it is the first time that they have gone to the playoffs in back-to-back seasons in franchise history. A lot of work went into this and it is finally all payoff off.
The White Sox started a rebuild in 2016. Just a few weeks after the Chicago Cubs ended their 108-year drought, the pressure was on the White Sox to come out of their shadow. They have done that now by executing this rebuild flawlessly. It started by trading Chris Sale to the Boston Red Sox in exchange for Yoan Moncada, Michael Kopech, and two other prospects.
Since then, they added prospects like Lucas Giolito, Reynaldo Lopez, Eloy Jimenez, Dylan Cease, and Luis Robert amongst others. They acquired veterans like Lance Lynn, Yasmani Grandal, Liam Hendriks, Craig Kimbrel, and Dallas Keuchel amongst others via trade or free agency which has really helped them out.
With great players that the White Sox stayed loyal to like Jose Abreu, Tim Anderson, and Carlos Rodon, there was plenty to build around. As important as playing the game the right way is in baseball, having talented players is a big part of it and the White Sox surely has talented players.
The White Sox have also done well drafting lately. Andrew Vaughn, Nick Madrigal, and Garrett Crochet are a few recent ones that have all made big contributions in different ways. If that continues, they will have sustained success for a very long time.
The Chicago White Sox has a division-winning formula in place right now.
All of these things happening guaranteed nothing but Rick Hahn clearly made a lot of great decisions. Tony La Russa was a very controversial hire by the White Sox as well but they have all come together to reach the common goal of winning the division. They have much loftier goals than winning the AL Central but this is an amazing start.
The clinching game was a perfect example of what this team is. Tim Anderson, Luis Robert, and Eloy Jimenez led an offensive outburst and Reynaldo Lopez had a great start as the White Sox run a six-man rotation. It was the first game of a doubleheader and they got the job done in the early game. They restated everyone in the second game and still almost won before Cleveland took it on a walk-off.
Of course, the White Sox had a big narrative following them this season and that has been the injuries. Robert, Jimenez, and Grandal all missed significant time with bad injuries. Somehow, the White Sox got through it which is why La Russa and Hahn deserve even more credit. Hahn for making sure the depth can withstand the injuries and La Russa for using that depth right. The White Sox are going to the playoffs and everyone should enjoy it.
The latest viral fitness trend has people reaching for a surprising snack before their workouts: Rice Krispies Treats.
The craze has recently taken off on TikTok, inspiring people to share their results, good and bad, on social media. But experts say while reaching for a Rice Krispies Treat before your workout is actually not a horrible option, it might not be the best choice.
One of the most popular videos showcasing the trend was posted by TikTok user @Ko0maa who claims the snack gives you “an insane pump” at the gym. The clip goes on to show him besting his personal weight-lifting record after downing a pre-workout Rice Krispies Treat. The post garnered more than 175,000 views and 14,000 likes.
“Trust me when I say it, Rice Krispies gonna make you have the best workout,” Twitter user @s_terrazas said.
Others are skeptical.
“Tried the Rice Krispies Treat before a workout thing. Don’t get it. 30 min of sugar high then a sugar crash that ruined the back end of my workout. Not for me,” user @RickSegall wrote.
By textbook nutrition standards, you ideally want to eat a well-rounded meal with carbohydrates, proteins and fat about three hours before a workout, says Abbie E. Smith-Ryan, an associate professor of exercise physiology at the University of North Carolinsa Chapel Hill who does research in sports nutrition and exercise performance.
If eat right before your workout, it’s best to focus on carbs and protein.
“A Rice Krispies Treat would be mostly carbs, but it’s a quick easily digested, so it’s not going to cause GI distress,” Smith-Ryan says.
But it would be best to also add some protein, she says: “So, for example, like a Greek yogurt. Or that’s where the protein shakes come in.”
While Rice Krispies Treats before a workout might not be harmful, Dr. Michael Daignault, an emergency physician and chief medical adviser for Reliant Health Service, doubts the trend is effective.
He suspects the touted energy boost “is related to a brief sugar high plus a placebo effect from a perceived performance enhancement.”
Daignault sayst each person’s metabolism is different, so the best pre-workout meals can vary.
“We know that there is certainly a benefit to having post-workout protein in the form of a smoothie or meal,” he says. “But, as far as pre-workout, athletes’ preferences vary and can include training on an empty stomach, eating a small meal of protein and good fat like avocado or using a pre-workout supplement.”
Deciding what’s best also depends on what kind of workout you’ll be doing, Smith-Ryan says.
“If I’m going to lift weights, I can probably stomach more than if I’m going to go run,” she says.
SOUTH BEND, IN – SEPTEMBER 18: Kyren Williams #23 of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish celebrates with teammates after a touchdown against the Purdue Boilermakers during the first half at Notre Dame Stadium on September 18, 2021 in South Bend, Indiana. (Photo by Michael Hickey/Getty Images)
The Notre Dame Fighting Irish are an interesting team right now. They are 3-0 but they haven’t been a dominant football team. All three games have been a little bit different but they haven’t looked like the force they need to be in order to have a playoff finish. Because of their non-conference status, they basically need to be undefeated to make the College Football Playoff.
They won their first game in overtime over a lowly Florida State team. In week two, they should have dominated the MAC’s Toledo but they won by a field goal. In week three, they looked a little better against Purdue as they won 27-13 but there are still some issues.
On Saturday, Notre Dame will be in Chicago to take on the Wisconsin Badgers at Soldier Field. This is a big game for the Irish as it will set the tone for a very difficult schedule this year. If they beat Wisconsin, which currently ranks 18, Notre Dame might be able to move up from their number 12 ranking. With number eight Cincinnati looming next week, it would be nice to go into that 4-0.
Notre Dame has its problems but it is a program that believes it can go undefeated every year. Beating Wisconsin would give them some confidence that they can beat good teams. Of course, a win is a win but they would love to blow Wisconsin out if they can. It doesn’t seem likely at this point but it’s why this game looms so large for the entire season.
The Irish are probably going to run the football a lot on Saturday. Wisconsin may as well so it is probably going to be a big part of the game as a whole. As a result, the team whose run defense shows up bigger could win the game. If either team can somehow establish a good game through the air, that may also be a big key to victory with everything going on in the run game.
Michael Mayer is a star player for the Irish. Getting him going in this game might be key as you should expect Jack Coan to target him a lot. Mayer only had one reception for five yards in last week’s win over Purdue so you know that may need to change. For Coan, he needs a big game to add this win for Notre Dame and the utilization of Mayer may be the key to that happening.
Both Notre Dame and Wisconsin need to win this game at Soldier Field on Saturday.
This is also huge for Wisconsin. They already have one loss to Penn State so they would love to add a ranked win to their resume. If they do that and run the table for the rest of the season, they would probably be right there near the top of the Big Ten for the College Football Playoff berth.
Both teams are good but haven’t shown what we may have thought they would going into the season. Each of them knows that the rest of their entire year could depend on this game in terms of their ability to qualify for the playoffs. As a result, expect a very good football game for this week’s ” College Gameday” game.
September 20th. That’s the day the Chicago Cubs‘ playoff dreams were put to rest for the 2021 season.
After a flurry of moves at the trade deadline ended with the Cubs’ most talented players being shipped out of Wrigleyville, the early elimination didn’t come as a surprise. Since the beginning of August the Cubs are 16-30, and outside of a seven-game winning streak, have looked like quite the pushover.
With just under two weeks until the regular season wraps up, the playoff race is in full gear, and despite already being eliminated, the Cubs could have a big impact on the outcome.
The Cubs have 10 games left on their schedule, and seven of them are against their arch-rival, the St. Louis Cardinals.
Although the playoffs are out of reach, the Cubs have an incredible opportunity – crush the Cardinals playoff dreams.
As of Thursday afternoon, the Cardinals have a strong grip on the second National League Wild Card spot, leading the Reds and Phillies by 5 games and the Padres by 6.5 games.
That’s certainly a comfortable lead with so few games remaining, but bigger leads have collapsed with less time to play. If the Cubs can take five or six out of the seven games against the Cardinals, they could deal a crushing blow to St. Louis’ playoff hopes, especially if one of the teams chasing them can get hot.
Beating the Cardinals that much would be hard at any point, but right now it’ll be even harder. Forget the state of the Cubs roster – the Cardinals are currently on a 12-game winning streak. They’re a team playing their best baseball with their eyes set on a postseason appearance. While it’ll be tough for the Cubs to throw water on the flaming hot Cardinals, the motivation of crushing your rivals’ playoff dreams should be massive motivation.
Rivalry aside, the Cubs’ final 10 games will weigh heavily on their 2022 draft position. After Wednesday night’s loss to the Minnesota Twins, the Cubs moved past them for the 7th pick in next year’s draft.
Realistically, the Cubs still have a wide range of outcomes as far as the draft order goes. As of Thursday morning, the Cubs were four games away from having the 5th pick in the draft, and five games away from having the 12th pick in the draft.
Over the season’s final three series, a lot can change for the Cubs. Whether it’d be more fun to see them crush the Cardinals’ playoff dreams or play awfully and move higher in the draft order probably depends on who you ask. For me, I’d rather see them squash the Cardinals’ postseason hopes, no matter how unlikely that outcome may be.
In a week dominated by quarterback chatter, the Chicago Bears now get set to strap up and play the game. Week 3, they visit the Cleveland Browns who remain one of the NFL’s undefeated.
Although Cleveland has yet to lose, they did allow the Houston Texans to keep it closer than Browns fans would have liked in Week 2.
With Justin Fields getting his first start of the season, this game will be one of the most-watched of the weekend based on that reason alone. But, there will be many reasons to tune in.
The Bears are coming off a narrow victory over the Cincinnati Bengals, but the game felt a whole lot more lopsided due to the Bears’ defense coming up big. Now sitting at 1-1, Chicago goes on the road to face a 2-0 Browns team that many picked as an AFC favorite prior to the season.
In a Week 3 matchup with a top AFC contender, the Chicago Bears should not be considered heavy underdogs.
While it’s easy for a fan to go into this game feeling worried, there are actually reasons to be hopeful. Sure, the obvious reason is due to the fact that the Bears will have Fields under center. That’s obvious.
Fields certainly gives the Bears the best chance to win, which is something Matt Nagy still hasn’t figured out yet. But, he’ll get to see what everybody else sees on Sunday.
Other than Fields, though, the Bears actually have some advantages in this one. Chicago has plenty of reason to feel confident going up against a team like the Browns, and it actually starts in the passing game, believe it or not.
‘”This is a great town. It’s got everything.” – Sun-Times columnist Ernie Souchak (John Belushi), describing his beloved Chicago in “Continental Divide.”
Even in 1981, Chicago Sun-Times news columnist Ernie Souchak was something of a throwback — a pavement-pounding, notebook-wielding investigative journalist who wore a terrible porkpie hat, almost always had a cigarette dangling from his lips, could throw down drinks with the best and worst of ’em at the Billy Goat Tavern and was constantly at odds with his gruff managing editor, who also happened to be his best friend.
Souchak was a man of the people, exchanging pleasantries with the local newsstand guy, cabdrivers, sex workers and even muggers he’d encounter on the gritty streets of the Loop, as newspaper trucks zipped by bearing the slogan, “ERNIE SOUCHAK: ONE REASON PEOPLE TURN TO THE BRIGHT ONE!” Then it was off to the paper, where he’d pen columns with leads such as, “Good Afternoon, Chicago: Ald. Yablonowitz has his finger in another sticky City Hall pie …”
What a time it was, and what a character was Ernie Souchak.
When we think of John Belushi’s most memorable roles in his tragically brief movie career (just seven feature films), the one-two punch of John “Bluto” Blutarsky in “National Lampoon’s Animal House” and Joliet Jake in “The Blues Brothers” will always be mentioned first. But Belushi delivered his most authentic and grounded performance as a sardonic and cynical but big-hearted ink-stained wretch in “Continental Divide,” which hit theaters 40 years ago this month — just six months before Belushi died of a drug overdose at the Chateau Marmont hotel in West Hollywood, California, at the age of 33.
Re-watching the film is a bittersweet experience, as we delight in Belushi’s quick-witted comments and his slapstick pratfalls as well as his nimble moves, as when Souchak hangs gracefully from the back of a train and doffs his hat while saying goodbye but not farewell to the love of his life. On a much less profound but still impactful level, “Continental Divide” holds a special place in my heart, as it would only be a half-dozen years before I would be walking into the same Sun-Times newsroom (in the old, squatty building at 401 N. Wabash) featured prominently in the movie, learning the ropes from some of the great reporters and editors in the country, pounding the Flintstones-looking keyboard and learning the Atex computer system with its green-on-black lettering and its station-to-station Messaging capabilities, which we thought was pretty damn futuristic at the time.
Director Michael Apted (The “Up” documentary series, “Coal Miner’s Daughter”) and screenwriter Lawrence Kasdan (writer of “The Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi” and director of such films as “The Big Chill” and “Grand Canyon”) fashioned “Continental Divide” as an homage to classic newspaper-themed screwball comedies such as “Woman of the Year” and “His Girl Friday,” with Belushi as the workaholic bachelor with outdated views of women and the wonderful Blair Brown (who looks and sounds a bit like a young Katharine Hepburn) as Dr. Nell Porter, a renowned but reclusive researcher who has been conducting studies on the endangered American bald eagle for several years in the Rocky Mountains.
Souchak almost never leaves Chicago and Nell is content to live in a remote cabin with just the magnificent peaks and the eagles and the occasional bear or mountain lion to keep her company, so how do these two even meet? Plot device! Souchak’s ongoing investigation into the criminal wrongdoings of the powerful, pinkie-ringed Ald. Yablonowitz (Val Avery) leads to a couple of corrupt cops beating him up and someone blowing up his apartment — so Souchak’s editor, Howard McDermott (Allen Garfield), tells him to get out of town for a while and pursue an interview with Nell.
OK, that’s a stretch, but we go with it. When Souchak is left stranded at Nell’s cabin high in the mountains for a two-week period until his crusty mountain guide will return and guide him to safety (Souchak would clearly die if he tried to make the trek alone), Nell reluctantly agrees to let Souchak stay with her, lest he starve to death or get eaten by a bear. When Nell discovers Souchak had planned to write a story about her, she exclaims, “Did it ever occur to you to ask permission? Of all the unmitigated, presumptuous gall!”
“Oh, there’s no call to use big words,” comes the deadpan reply.
Ernie Souchak stays in a mountain cabin with wildlife researcher Nell Porter (Blair Brown) while attempting to interview her.Universal Pictures
So, we have a classic fish-out-of-water adventure, with a budding romance between two opposites who have nothing in common but quickly become friends and then lovers — all within two weeks, because this is the movies. Eventually the action returns to Chicago, with more scenes shot inside the gloriously shabby Sun-Times newsroom, as well as inside the Billy Goat and at the old Chicago & Northwestern Terminal (now the Richard B. Ogilvie Transportation Center).
“Continental Divide” is not a great newspaper film on par with films such as “All the President’s Men” or “Spotlight.” For one thing, we spend as much time in the country as we do in the city. But as Souchak himself might say, it’s a damn solid picture about a damn good journalist, and there’s a helluva love story in there as well.