Videos

Best Hookup Sites and Apps for Adult Dating in 2022Corvelay Mediaon September 7, 2022 at 12:04 pm

Traditional dating isn’t for everyone. Some people want serious relationships while others want something more casual, like a hookup. The taboo around casual dating has subsided in recent years. Casual daters have plenty of options, but most opt to try hookup sites to find what (and who) they want.

Different sites cater to different tastes. A site’s speciality is not always immediately apparent. So it can be a challenge to find the right site for you. That’s where we come in. We’ve signed up for and tried the best hookup sites and apps for casual encounters to get some action.

Let’s dive into the reviews and ratings.

Click ↓ next to the name of the site to jump straight to the review.

Best Hookup Sites and Apps for Casual Dating in 2022

RankSiteBest For1.Adult FriendFinder Best overall hookup site2. BuddyBang Runner-up3.BeNaughty Best for flirtiest saingles4.Ashley Madison Best for affairs5.Seeking Best for sugar baby/sugar daddy/mommy6.ALT Best for alternative and BDSM sex7.OKCupid Top choice for millennials8.Hinge Somewhat serious, but mostly FWB9.Zoosk Best for short-term dating10.Bumble Best for women11.Plenty of Fish Best for lots of options12.Tinder Most popular app13.Pure App Best for fantasy based14.Feeld Most open-minded singles15.Sex Messenger Best for anonymous hookups16.Reddit R4R Best completely free option

1.  Adult FriendFinder – Best overall hookup site

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

100 percent designed for sex, sex, and more sexYou’ll find any kink on the spectrumRelatively easy to find people into the same things as you

Cons

Pro memberships are expensiveFree version has too many ads

Adult FriendFinder is the oldest and most popular hookup site. As its name suggests, it’s primarily interested in helping adults make, *ahem*, adult friends.

It caters to swinging, non-monogamous relationships, threesomes, and experimental arrangements. Whether you’re looking for an NSA (no-strings-attached) relationship, a one-night stand to spice up your marriage, or a quick fling, you’ll find someone looking for the same thing.

Once you create a profile on Adult FriendFinder, you can customize your search to narrow down people interested in the same arrangement as you.

Adult FriendFinder has bonus additional content such as webcam shows and erotic stories. So if you need a little warming up before connecting with someone, you’re covered.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$39.95 totalThree months$26.95/month ($80.85 total)One year$19.95/month ($239.40 total)

What Users Think About Adult FriendFinder

“I was on another site. Met a guy who told me about Adult FriendFinder (AFF). I signed up. Have been on AFF for a little over a year and a half. Have nothing but praise. When AFF works, it WORKS! For the most part, I have met some truly wonderful men. Local men, business men coming through my area, couples. Overwhelmingly positive experience and exactly what I was looking for: no strings, no drama, casual sex.”

Belinda S

Need a little more info before taking the plunge? Check out our in-depth Adult FriendFinder review.

2.  BuddyBang Runner-up

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★★

Pros

Users are very responsiveEveryone is to-the-pointAdvanced search and filter functionsAffordable

Cons

Annoying ads when you use the free versionHard to get to know users because they’re so thirsty

BuddyBang helps you find a buddy to sleep with. That shouldn’t be hard for you to figure out. This no-judgement site operates like an express train to the friends-with-benefits phase. It’s as simple as browse, chat, bang.

While you won’t find romance here, you will find passion. Lustful adults flock to BuddyBang to chat and make connections. Ultimately, the goal is to arrange a meetup with a saucy stranger in your area. If you’re lucky, that one-night stand might turn into a long-term arrangement.

With a relatively affordable monthly subscription and advanced search filters, getting laid on BuddyBang is a piece of cake. It’s way easier than shelling out tons of cash for dinner dates that may lead nowhere.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$39.95 totalThree months$26.95/month ($80.85 total)One year$19.95/month ($239.40 total)

What Users Think About BuddyBang

“A lotta hookup sites out there, which means a lot of scams. Gotta be honest, at first I was skeptical of BuddyBang. Seemed like another fake site that just wanted your cash. But I was pleasantly surprised. More than that, I was very happy with my experience. I met a couple real girls here who, let’s just say, were down to get down. And that’s all I wanted. I wasn’t a creep. I kept it cool, wasn’t aggressive with messaging and it all worked. I recommend it!”

Chris745

3.  BeNaughty – Best for flirty singles

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★★★

Pros

Various ways to connectNo judgement when it comes to kinksGreat for finding singles and couplesCheap three-day trial

Cons

Users tend to be appearance-drivenYou’ll eventually want a premium membership

BeNaughty naturally draws some of the most frisky singles in your area. It’s in the name. Plus, breaking the ice is easy as BeNaughty gives users tons of ways to connect. Browse the gallery or enter a naughty chat room for potential dates. When you find someone you like, you can send a wink, a message, or start a live one-on-one chat.

BeNaughty works because it’s to-the-point. While users are looking for fast fun, there is no time for games. They want a hookup, and quickly.

Open-minded and discreet, BeNaughty gives you the option to seek out singles or couples for a fast fling. By adjusting your search filter, you can find your ideal scenario and weed out people who aren’t your type.

Membership LengthPriceThree day trial$1.05/dayOne month$27.01 totalThree months$15.15/month ($45.45 total)Six months$12.24/month ($73.44 total)

What Users Think About BeNaughty

“Here you can be selective. The choice of profiles is quite large. The girls are active, many of them are constantly online. There are those who only like online communication and do not want to go on dates. However, it is their choice. If you are interested in online flirting, it will be a lot of fun with this site. Some people want more, so I’m still looking for someone to go on a real date with me.”

Robert S

4.  Ashley Madison – Best for affairs

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★★

Pros

Free for women to useVery discreetJudgment-free because nearly everyone is married and looking

Cons

Not the most moral hookup optionExpensive for men to use

Ashley Madison has the reputation of being a site for affairs and discreet married dating. Its slogan is literally “Life is short. Have an affair.” The brand has become notoriously known over the years for being a site for married people to flirt and hook up.

The site caters to students in relationships, lonely wives, married men, and everyday people who want to find a safe space to maintain an affair and not be judged. This hookup site is excellent for those who are attached and seeking excitement from a monotone lifestyle and exploring the world of extramarital affairs.

Ashley Madison is the first married dating website and is committed to discretion. Despite the backlash and reputation, this site continues to be popular and has an immense database that crosses every major city in the world.

Membership TierPriceBasic100 credits at $0.59/creditClassic500 credits at $0.34/creditElite1,000 credits at $0.29/credit

You message and live chat with users in exchange for credits. It’s about 5 credits to sent a message or 50 credits/hour to live chat. For more information about credits and other aspects of the site, see our full Ashley Madison review.

What Users Think About Ashley Madison

“As a woman, I can tell you that this site works. I’ve met and hooked up with a lot of great guys. However, I will say that since there are considerably more men than women on the site you have to make yourself stand out from the crowd. Women like to be wined and dined and brought on business trips, to a nice hotel, etc… Be patient, it works. I found a great guy who I have been hooking up with on a regular basis for over 2 years now and we are very happy with the arrangement.”

JennaK

5.  Seeking – Best for sugar relationships

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Free for women to useVery discreetJudgment-free because nearly everyone is married and looking

Cons

Not the most moral hookup optionExpensive for men to use

Seeking has undergone a brand transformation, but it still attracts a straightforward target audience: rich and experienced individuals seeking the young and gorgeous. This sugar daddy site is about helping daddies and mommas find sugar babies or cubs for hookups.

It has a much higher user base of women because the “sugar baby” theme brings many young women to the site. The site claims to have four times the number of women than men in their database. The prerequisite is that sugar daddies have to be wealthy and successful. They give priority to verified “elite members” who join with the sole intention of spoiling their sugar babies with money and attention.

Seeking is a great site for beautiful young women looking for fun, attention, and a “daddy” to spoil them! This site is not the best to find a lasting love story—it’s geared toward hookups and has a more transaction-like nature.

Women who’d like to meet a well-off older man (or would be babies), you’re in luck – you do not have to pay to use Seeking.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$89.95/monthThree month$79.95/month ($239.85 total)Diamond (more premium features)$249.95/month

What Users Think About Seeking

“Came across them on Facebook and decided to spend a few bucks to find some men. Although not all the men were true to their description and some being scammers, it was pretty easy to find the genuinely interested ones from the fakes. It is a dating site for the wealthier crowd as we spend a lot of money but you can find a suitable candidate here.”

Brenda T

Still not sure or need more information? Check out our full Seeking review.

6.  ALT – Best for alternative relationships

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★Real profiles★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Easily find people that share your kinkLots of X-rated content to browse throughLive cams and shows

Cons

Too many fake profilesHave to buy a premium account to get the most access

ALT is a full-on casual sex website. It’s not for anyone who is on the hunt for a serious relationship. This site is all about casual sex in every form to gratify any sex-seeker! The website’s community is made up of those who are into alternative bondage, who enjoy hooking up online, live, and in-person for sex dates.

It caters to people who want to find alternative, BDSM, bondage, and fetish partners who can connect online and meet in person. ALT speaks to swingers, dominatrixes, and mistresses looking for power exchange.

ALT is the leading BDSM site, with almost 2 million members. You can easily customize your fetish and find someone who is into the same kinks as you! Remember that this site is all about kink, such as orgies, being humiliated, or being tortured, and not about vanilla sex. So, if you’re looking for just plain sex, opt for another option on this list.

Membership TierPriceSilver$19.95/monthGold$29.95/month

What Users Think About ALT

“Don’t listen to all the haters!!!! Alt.com is one of the best sites. Been using it in the past and it worked quite good. Nowadays I’d also try Casuasexonly.com and Fetlife.com. And there are also a few smaller sites that work but they are more ‘special niche sites’.”

Daniel

7. OKCupid – Best for millennials and young people

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★Customer service★★★★★

Pros

Vast user base of peopleFind locals who are looking for casual sex and datingAffordable

Cons

May find many looking for long-term relationshipsWill have to answer quite a few questions to see matches

OKCupid is a mainstream dating app that caters to many different kinds of relationships. It provides a multitude of choices for millennials looking not just for long-term relationships but options for short-term relationships, casual dating, and hookups. All you have to do is set that as what you are looking for, and they match you to like-minded people!

This site gears toward a generally younger audience—the age group between 18-29. This site is also one of the most inclusive mainstream dating websites that includes many gender and orientation options, helping you zero in on the particular pool of choices you want!

OKCupid may be a mainstream dating app that includes finding long-term relationships, but given its wide range of options, filters, and preferences, it’s a great app for hookups and casual sex as well. Just be up-front and be prepared to meet a great bunch of locals looking for the same things as you.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$19.95 totalSix months$9.95/month ($59.70 total)

What Users Think About OKCupid

“OkCupid is a dating app worth checking out. For the most part I have been disappointed with my dating app experiences. I have been pleasantly surprised with the results from OkCupid. There seems to be an endless supply of genuine women interested in a relationship. After several weeks of using the app for free, I decided to become a subscriber. I have been satisfied with my decision.”

Robert S

8.  Hinge – Best for hybrid serious and FWB relationships

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★★★

Pros

Popular with millennialsMatchmaking algorithm is great (apt for FWB)

Cons

Created for finding long-lasting relationshipsMay not find a large user base of casual sex enthusiasts

Hinge is a mainstream dating app that focuses on finding real romance—but it is also used to find casual sex and friends with benefits. The truth about Hinge is that it’s “designed to be deleted.”

But fear not! This app is incredibly popular with the younger crowd (18 to 29 years of age) and has filters to state the nature of the relationship you’re interested in. This setup is the best for friends with benefits because you have to answer questions about yourself and your preferences, which will bring you closer to meeting someone you share similar interests with and are attracted to!

Hinge is a great hookup app for those who want to find a casual relationship where you hook up with the same person a few times instead of just a one-night stand. Just be straight up with what you’re looking for—and you might just meet a new FWB with absolutely no strings attached.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$19.95 totalThree months$20.99 totalSix months$29.99 total

What Users Think About Hinge

“Hinge is amazing! I think the thing that I like about it is that if you don’t pay it limits you to 10 likes a day and so it’s more likely that people will pay attention to you rather than getting distracted by yet another profile. And everyone is more careful about who they pick so if you match you’re more likely to talk I think. It also does a great job of conversation prompts that go with photos or without. Definitely check it out.”

James B

9.  Zoosk – Best for short term dating

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Very active usersUsed in over 80 countriesDiverse selection to find what you’re looking for

Cons

May not be the best site for casual sexAdditional features cost extra

Zoosk is a great short-term dating site that is internationally famous. It has a community of 35 million users in 80 different countries, and it is open to singles of all ages, races, religions, and sexual orientations—making it one of the most diverse casual dating apps.

This app may not be the best for casual hookups and one-night stands, but it is a good contender for short-term dating. If you’re in your early to mid-20s, you’ll find a great selection of singles who are interested in short-term or casual relationships.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$29.95 totalThree months$19.98/month ($59.94 total)Six months$12.49/month ($74.94 total)

What Users Think About Zoosk

“Satisfied with the outcome, pretty good dating site. I think the price is OK and I liked the option of pausing account, very useful when you’re trying to focus on one person. As we all know, it takes several attempts to meet someone you are really interested in.”

Ewa S

10.  Bumble – Safest for women

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★★★

Pros

More women than menWomen initiate contactComprehensive and easy-to-use interface

Cons

Other relationships (friendships and business networking) get in the way of potentials

Bumble has gained a reputation for being different from most other mainstream dating and hookup apps. If you haven’t heard of this app already, Bumble is one of the first and only sites where women make the first move and get to screen potential men immediately. Men simply cannot reach out to any women unless they’ve initiated contact and interest.

It is catered towards and attracts more women than men looking to mingle or find networking opportunities, friends, or hookups! Even though it has a relatively positive and clean rep, it’s a great site for educated, good-looking men who are searching for successful, bold women.

Membership TierPricePremium$8.99/month

What Users Think About Bumble

“The Bumble app has an easy format to navigate and I like that women have to make the first contact. That Helped me out of my comfort zone. I liked that you can adjust your distance from possible matches.”

Leanne N

11.  Plenty of Fish – Best for lots of options

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Multiple search filtersLargest user base of profiles

Cons

May come across bots or fake accounts

Plenty of Fish has the largest user base. POF was launched in 2003, being one of the oldest dating sites. Since it’s free and easy to sign up, you’re going to be exposed to a lot of different types of people, looking for different things, so you’ll have to filter through them all.

Since it’s been around for a long time, it has gained a reputation as a matchmaker site that will ask questions about your family, career, and interests to match you with similar users. It’s catered for people who want to dip their toes into dating and hookup sites to explore options.

Plenty of Fish may or may not have people looking for casual sex, depending on your luck. It’s a matchmaker site that is geared more for a long-term commitment. So you have to be prepared to screen different kinds of people.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$19.99/monthThree months$9.80/month ($29.40/total)One year$5.95/month ($71.40 total)

What Users Think About Plenty of Fish

“Plenty of catfish and foreigners who can’t speak English. However, even if you’re not a paid subscriber you can opt in for only paid subscribers. The site also provides an option for voice calls through the app. I’m going to try the site out for a month or so, then may upgrade to being a paid subscriber. POF has really improved its website since I was on it a year ago. Have fun and meet someone!”

Kathleen M

12.  Tinder – Most popular app

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★Real profiles★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Best starter app for quick sexLots of escorts

Cons

Lots of fake profilesVery superficial and appearance-focused

You didn’t think this list was going to end without this sex gem of an app, did you? Tinder is the most widely known hookup app of this generation. It has an infamous rep for finding casual sex ASAP.

Tinder caters to men and women looking to get laid based on appearance. It’s known for its classic swiping left to reject and swiping right to like someone’s profile. If you’re looking for sex, Tinder has a huge user base and a large number of locals, meaning you can probably secure a sex date tonight—but the catch is that your profile needs to stand out. If you’re not conventionally attractive, you’re going to struggle to find dates.

For men who can’t seem to find dates, Tinder has a large user base of escorts who will private message their rates. If you’re horny and want it—then maybe you can meet a potential escort on Tinder.

Membership Length/TierPriceLimited SwipesFreeOne month$9.99 total if you’re under 30One month$19.99 total if you’re over 30

What Users Think About Tinder

“I’ve been using tinder for quite some time and I really enjoy it! I travel a lot and t’s great way to meet new people. Tinder has a feature called Face To Face you can use to video chat within the app. Tinder has on-demand safety features via Noonlight, which offers a Timeline feature where users can share first date details on their Timelines, like who they’re meeting, when and where. Users can also discreetly contact emergency services via Noonlight.”

Sophia F

13.  Pure App – Best for fantasy based hookups

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★Real profiles★★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Profiles, messages, and photos shared will disappear once you’re doneStarting up is easy: post a photo and sentenceEmbraces individuality and authentic fantasies

Cons

Only popular in major cities

Pure App was created for shameless and judgment-free fantasy and desire-based dating. This app is purely for NSA affairs and is completely secretive and anonymous. It encourages its users to be whoever they choose to be and still be themselves.

It caters to people who have wild fantasies or desires that aren’t celebrated on mainstream dating and hookup apps. It allows your individuality to shine through—choosing your gender and sexuality—and providing guaranteed privacy and safety to video chat and meet whoever shares the same fantasies as you.

Pure App uses your GPS location on your phone to find other Pure users looking for some NSA action. You just have to post a photo and an up-front headline and wait to see if anyone close is interested. When you’re done, your profile will vanish, along with all your messages and photos—no need to worry about deactivating or privacy issues.

Membership LengthPriceOne week$14.99 totalOne month$19.99 total

What Users Think About Pure App

“I am a 25 year old attractive woman, I have never been on a site before however After almost a year of dating and taking things slowly and 4 months of not being interested enough to take things further, I broke and downloaded pure. Downloaded Wednesday, Thursday (yesterday) spontaneously arranged to meet a really really attractive guy who spent a few great hours with me. We got along really well. I also had a video chat with a really attractive couple who I’ll be meeting soon. I’m speaking to other really attractive guys as well.”

Abi S

14.  Feeld Best for adventurous singles

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★Success rate★★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

One of the largest open-minded communities worldwideSex-positive and promotes ethical dating choices

Cons

Premium version is not available on AndroidMust have a Facebook account to verify your identity during sign-up

Feeld is a hookup app for couples and singles to explore their kinks and desires in a no-judgement atmosphere.

It includes couples’ accounts where you and your partner can date a lover or meet someone for a threesome. It’s inclusive for all genders and sexual orientations. Overall, it’s a sex-positive space for anyone looking to explore beyond “the norm” in today’s society.

Feeld prides itself on being responsible and ethical. It connects people with like-minded folk and encourages curious monogamous couples to link with partners who are also interested. It is a safe space that allows couples to explore their desires in the most honest way possible.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$14.99 totalThree months$29.98 total

What Users Think About Feeld

“It’s called the ‘Tinder for threesomes’ for a reason. I’ll let you do the imagining.”

Jon R

15.  Sex Messenger – Best for anonymous hookups

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★★Real profiles★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★★

Pros

Safe way to send and receive nudesAnonymity is keyGoal is to meet up for anonymous sex—NSA!

Cons

Need to pay for a premium account to access live chat or live cams

Sex Messenger is an anonymous instant messaging app—like WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger. But you never share your name because it’s meant to be discreet and only for sexting and trading nudes.

This app is an adult social network that is much more than an online sex chat. It caters to people who want to connect with other people who want to engage in sex and dirty talk, and fulfill each other’s sexual fantasies. Instant messaging on this app and posting blog entries will help you gain the attention you want from like-minded people.

All members must verify their accounts, so this weeds out fake profiles, scammers, and bots. Members can contribute to the website through Sex Messenger’s forums, chats, group sections, sex stories, and blogs. It’s all anonymous and fully discrete. This app is a great way to sext, increase sexual tension, and finally meet up to do the deed.

Membership LengthPriceOne month$14.95 total

What Users Think About Sex Messenger

“I’m recently single and wanted to have a little fun but was skeptical about trying something online. You hear about the horror stories. I found Sex Messenger and immediately thought SCAM. But I gave it a shot and found a couple fun guys within a couple weeks. I didn’t need to renew my membership.”

Olivia B

16.  Reddit R4R – Best completely free option

SpecificationRatingUser experience★★★★Real profiles★★★★Success rate★★★★Customer service★★★

Pros

FreeNo membership neededLots of daily interactions and hits

Cons

Hard to stand outCan’t pay to boost your postsMostly guys

Reddit R4R is one of the best options for browse casual sex options for free. If you’re looking for a hookup but don’t want to sign up, post photos of yourself, and write out a bio to describe who you are and what you want . . . you found the site for you!

This site works as a personals subreddit. It works like any other subreddit. Anyone can post—no photos, no personal information needed! All you have to do is list some things about yourself and the type of person you’re looking for. And then you wait to see if anyone responds to your post.

Reddit R4R is free, so all you have to do is download the Reddit app, and you don’t need to worry about spending money. If you want to be a trusted member and not get blocked, just follow the posting rules! Users love this site to get laid because it’s easy to use, free, and starts an instant conversation with like-minded people.

Membership TierPriceUnlimitedFree

What Users Think About Reddit R4R

“Look, it’s Reddit. You ‘get what you pay for,’ but it’s cool to scroll the profiles and chat for free. Too many guys but I definitely found and met up with a couple hotties.”

Jack P

Hookup Site Guide

Still on the fence about whether or not you should start using hookup apps? Or maybe you’re already using them but want some more information? Check out this useful guide to answer any lingering questions you may have and walk away with some important safety tips about casual sex.

What Makes a Hookup Site Good?

It’s important to note that different sites cater to different kinds of people. So before creating a profile on any old hookup site, read the reviews to make sure it meets your needs.

Here are a few tips to find the best hookup site specific to you:

If you have a particular kink or preference, keep an eye out for it. (example: Looking for discreet affairs? Ashley Madison is the one for you!)Make sure the size of the user base is relatively large. More options mean a better chance of finding someone to hook up with.Find a site that allows users to be up-front about what they want. Usually, apps have preferences, and you can set yours to “casual relationship” or “hookup.”Make sure the customer service contact information is front and center. You shouldn’t have to go on an expedition to contact the site.

FAQs About Hookup Sites

Q: Are hookup sites safe?

Like any online dating platform, reputable hookup sites have embedded safety features that still require user discretion. It can be dangerous if you don’t take proper safety measures. Generally, these sites and apps regulate safety by banning bots and scammers and have options to report any bad or suspicious behavior. So if you’re planning on joining, be aware and try your best not to be too gullible—you can never be sure who you will come across online!

Q: Are there any completely free hookup sites?

It sucks that most dating apps and casual sex apps require you to subscribe to get optimum results. But sites like Reddit R4R and Craigslist Activities offer a free platform to chat, flirt, and arrange sex dates. But the only downside is that there is no moderation and you won’t be talking to a verified profile and have to be extra cautious.

Q: What hookup sites are free for women?

The reality is that dating apps make it very easy for women to find sex. Most high-rated dating sites offer women free memberships (mostly to balance out the male/female ratio on their site). Sex sites that are free for women include Bumble, OkCupid, Tinder, Seeking, Hinge, Her, and Pure.

Q: What is the best LGBTQ+ option?

Though there are a few options, only two rise to the top. HER is the best for women seeking women and Grindr is best for men seeking for men. These two sites also cater to non-binary people.

Final Verdict

If you’re looking for some action tonight, welcome to the world of casual sex sites and apps.

The best hookup sites are on top for a reason—everyone on there is eager to find sex and casual flings just like you! More than mainstream dating apps that cater to a plethora of things such as long-term dating, friendships, and so on, hookup apps are catered only towards sex and NSA fun!

The best hookup site is Adult FriendFinder (AFF) followed closely by BuddyBang. AFF emphasizes anonymity, safety, a massive user base, and a brand name that is verified. Most people on this site are looking for a good time with so many different types of kinks and fantasies. So what are you waiting for?

Hopefully, this list gives you an idea of what sex app is the best for you to get started on today.

Read More

Best Hookup Sites and Apps for Adult Dating in 2022Corvelay Mediaon September 7, 2022 at 12:04 pm Read More »

Bears wrong to expect taxpayers to fund any part of Arlington Heights stadium plan

The Chicago Bears are cracking open their playbook this week, providing a glimpse of the stadium and entertainment complex planned for Arlington Heights.

Master plan renderings of the team’s proposal for the 326-acre former Arlington Park Racetrack site convey the massiveness of the proposed project, but not much detail other than a stadium surrounded by green space, roads and a “mixed-use district” of anonymous-for-now structures.

The Bears say they will build the stadium on their own dime. But be warned: The team wants taxpayer help to get that mixed-use district across the goal line.

“While the Bears will seek no public funding for direct stadium structure construction, given the broad, long-term public benefits of this project, we look forward to partnering with the various governmental bodies to secure additional funding and assistance needed to support the feasibility of the remainder of the development,” the team said in an open letter released Tuesday.

If the Bears, a sports franchise now worth $5 billion — the sixth most valuable NFL team, according to Sportico — can make a better deal and find greener pastures for themselves in Arlington Heights, then good for them.

But the team shouldn’t expect the public’s help paying for any part of the project, especially given the tremendous windfall the organization will reap if the venture is successful.

Given today’s economic climate and the demand on tax dollars for basic services and to balance government budgets, it’s shameful for the Bears to even ask.

Renderings and rosy numbers

The release of the renderings and the letter comes just before Thursday’s public meeting in Arlington Heights on the stadium.

The Bears haven’t yet said how much public money they’ll seek, but we’d wager the “ask” will be substantial given the size of the non-stadium portions of the proposal, as indicated in the renderings.

And the financial numbers released are rosy enough to warrant a section at the Chicago Botanic Gardens: The team promises $9.4 billion in economic impact for the region, part of which is a yearly tax haul of $51 million for the state and $9.8 for Cook County.

“Make no mistake. This is much more than a stadium project,” the Bears said in that open letter. “Any development of Arlington Park will propose to include a multi-purpose entertainment, commercial/retail and housing district that will provide considerable economic benefits to Cook County, the surrounding region and the state of Illinois.”

But sports stadium expert and University of Chicago economics professor Allen Sanderson cast doubt on the numbers — and we agree.

“Whenever anyone is offering up an economic impact number, a good rule of thumb is to move the decimal one place to the left,” Sanderson told Sun-Times reporter Fran Spielman, while noting he hasn’t seen the Bears’ research.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s the Bears, or a local chamber of commerce, or a mayor — 90% of that is hyperbole or just inflated,” he said.

‘Multi-purpose entertainment district’

The Bears signed a $197 million option last September to buy the old Arlington Heights racetrack site with an eye toward moving out of Soldier Field, where the team has been a tenant since 1971.

The Bears’ Soldier Field lease expires in 2033. Reminder: Taxpayers are still on the hook for $400 million of the $606 million stadium renovation in 2003.

At the Arlington Heights site, the team said it envisions a multi-purpose entertainment district with a “best-in-class, enclosed stadium” capable of hosting college football playoffs, the NCAA’s Final Four basketball championships and the Super Bowl.

“The long-term vision for the entire project is an ongoing work in progress, but could include: restaurants, office space, hotel, fitness center, new parks and open spaces and other improvements for the community to enjoy.”

That’s all well and good. But the days of using public funds to assist sports stadium projects must go the way of the leather helmet.

And there are always hidden infrastructure costs to taxpayers in projects like these.

As this editorial board wrote a year ago: “If the Bears move to Arlington Heights, what are the chances the team will pay for the new roads and other infrastructure needed to make the stadium work? About zero. You, the taxpayer, will pay those costs, directly or indirectly.”

Another reminder: Back in the 1970s, the team asked Arlington Heights to issue bonds to build a stadium possibly patterned after the Pontiac Silverdome in Michigan. That deal fell through.

Studies have shown that rosy revenue estimates of the economic impact of sports stadiums simply do not pan out. Even if the Bears master plan and financial projections are as accurate as a Sid Luckman pass, lawmakers should spike any ask for public funds to finance any part of the stadium project.

Especially for a 102-year-old NFL franchise that’s worth billions.

The Sun-Times welcomes letters to the editor and op-eds. See our guidelines.

Read More

Bears wrong to expect taxpayers to fund any part of Arlington Heights stadium plan Read More »

Bears-49ers could shed light on a Nagy problem

Matt Nagy’s culpability for the Bears’ offensive ineptitude over the past three seasons is undeniable.

Even when you factor in circumstances he didn’t control, Nagy’s inability to develop a quarterback and produce an offense that could consistently score more than 20 points is arguably the biggest coaching level disappointment of the post-Ditka era — relative to the job he was hired to do and the lengths the Bears went to get the quarterbacks that Nagy was expected to mold into a star.

Still, it’s regrettable that the former Bears head coach has become such a punching bag in this town — the football version of Mrs. O’Leary’s cow. On social media, Nagy has become a symbol of bad offensive football: “Notre Dame’s offense is Matt Nagy bad.” Coaching is a tough business, indeed. And here’s hoping some day Nagy will get a chance to prove he learned from the mistakes he made in Chicago.

Be that as it may, facts are facts. And this Bears season is unquestionably a referendum on the Nagy era in Chicago (and in Pittsburgh, where any success Mitch Trubisky has with the Steelers will reflect on Nagy as well).

And right off the bat, we get a semblance of an apples-to-apples comparison Sunday against the 49ers — a team Nagy’s Bears lost to 33-22 in Week 8 last season at Soldier Field.

That actually was one of the Bears’ better offensive showings under Nagy — though with Bill Lazor calling plays. The 22 offensive points is the fourth-highest total of the Bears’ 26 games against teams that made the playoffs in Nagy’s four seasons. Justin Fields rushed for 103 yards, including a dazzling 22-yard touchdown that turned into just another tease.

The beauty of this comparison is that player-for-player, the Bears’ offensive lineup Sunday won’t be any better than it was against the 49ers last year — and arguably worse.

Among the changes, the Bears will have fifth-round rookie left tackle Braxton Jones for Jason Peters, and likely will have wide receiver Equanimeous St. Brown for Allen Robinson and right guard Lucas Patrick for James Daniels. Running David Montgomery (who did not play against the 49ers last year because of injury) for Khalil Herbert is the only real upgrade. So it’s not like the Bears have given offensive coordinator Getsy weapons that Nagy didn’t have.

The Bears generally are optimistic they’ll be better offensively this year, but –publicly at least –it’s the same hopeful optimism every other offense in the NFL has in Week 1.

“If we get off the ball, we all do our jobs and execute well, then our offense is really good,” Fields said.

But Fields was guarded when asked what is different about Getsy’s offense that will produce more points than they scored under Nagy last season.

“There’s a lot of different stuff, but I’m not gonna put it out there right now,” Fields said, “because we have a game coming up Sunday. I’m not gonna [put] the game plan out there. But there’s a fair amount of stuff that’s different for sure.”

Wide receiver Darnell Mooney was optimistic even about Nagy’s offense and sees good things about Getsy’s offense. But even he is a bit more guarded now.

“I can talk about it … but honestly, we can’t really tell until we play this game and then we’ll see, ‘This is our identity,'” Mooney said. “We practice, practice, practice and play preseason games … but until the starting 11 goes out there and plays and we actually identify who we are, that’s when we’ll be able to tell.”

Getsy’s first game vs Nagy’s 58th game is not exactly apples-to-apples. The Bears’ offense might not score as many points against the 49ers on Sunday as it scored last year. But if it does … the celebratory drink will come with a vitriol chaser.

Read More

Bears-49ers could shed light on a Nagy problem Read More »

White Sox come from behind for 9-6 victory, take series from Mariners

SEATTLE — Eloy Jimenez homered and doubled and drove in three runs, and Gavin Sheets knocked in the go-ahead run with an infield chopper, helping the White Sox recover from a lackluster start and come back for an improbable 9-6 victory over the Mariners Wednesday.

The result gave the Sox (69-68) two wins in three games in Seattle and pushed them a game above the .500 mark as they try to catch the first place Guardians in the AL Central.

Mariners right-hander Luis Castillo struck out the first seven Sox batters and the Mariners scored four runs in a defensively sloppy third inning against Michael Kopech, two runs coming on the first of two homers by Eurenio Suarez.

But the Sox got two in the fourth on a Jimenez homer to cut the lead in half, their first hit against Castillo, and plated four in the sixth to take a 6-4 lead. An RBI single by Jose Abreu an RBI double by Jimenez and an RBI double by Andrew Vaughn were the big blows. An error by Suarez at third base started the inning.

Seattle tied it with runs in the sixth and seventh against relievers Jake Diekman and Joe Kelly. In the Sox eighth, Jimenez singled, and pinch runner Leury Garcia stole second and took third on catcher Curt Casili’s throw that skipped into center. Garcia scored on Sheets’ bouncer to drawn in shortstop J.P. Crawford, giving the Sox a 7-6 lead.

A throwing error by Mariners reliever Chris Flexen on Seby Zavala’s sacrifice bunt opened up a two-run ninth for the Sox, who got their second run on Abreu’s sacrifice fly.

Vince Velasquez, in an unusual high-leverage eighth-inning role, retired all three batters he faced and Liam Hendriks pitched the ninth for his 31st save.

The Mariners came into the series riding a seven-game winning streak. The Sox have won six of their last eight games.

The Sox open a four-game series in Oakland Thursday.

Read More

White Sox come from behind for 9-6 victory, take series from Mariners Read More »

Get the Chicago Reader in print every other week

Many Reader boxes including downtown and transit line locations will be restocked on the Wednesday following each issue date.

The latest issue

The latest print issue of the Reader is the issue of September 1, 2022. Distribution began yesterday morning and continues through tonight.

You can download the print issue as a free PDF.

The Chicago Reader is published in print every other week and distributed free to the 1,100 locations on this map (which can also be opened in a separate window or tab). Copies are available free of charge—while supplies last.

Never miss a copy! Paid print subscriptions are available for 12 issues, 26 issues, and for 52 issues from the Reader Store.

Chicago Reader 2022 print issue dates

The Chicago Reader is published in print every other week. Issues are dated Thursday. Distribution usually happens Wednesday morning through Thursday night of the issue date. Upcoming print issue dates through December 2022 are:

9/15/20229/29/202210/13/202210/27/202211/10/202211/24/202212/8/202212/22/2022

Download the full 2022 editorial calendar is here (PDF).

See our information page for advertising opportunities.

2023 print issue dates

The first print issue in 2023 will be published three weeks after the 12/22/2022 issue, the final issue of 2022. The print issue dates through March 2023 are:

1/12/20231/26/20232/9/20232/23/20233/9/20233/23/2023

Related


[PRESS RELEASE] Baim stepping down as Reader publisher end of 2022


Chicago Reader hires social justice reporter

Debbie-Marie Brown fills this position made possible by grant funding from the Field Foundation.


[PRESS RELEASE] Lawyers for Social Justice Reception

Benefitting The Reader Institute for Community Journalism,
Publisher of the Chicago Reader

Read More

Get the Chicago Reader in print every other week Read More »

Get the Chicago Reader in print every other weekChicago Readeron September 7, 2022 at 9:57 pm

Many Reader boxes including downtown and transit line locations will be restocked on the Wednesday following each issue date.

The latest issue

The latest print issue of the Reader is the issue of September 1, 2022. Distribution began yesterday morning and continues through tonight.

You can download the print issue as a free PDF.

The Chicago Reader is published in print every other week and distributed free to the 1,100 locations on this map (which can also be opened in a separate window or tab). Copies are available free of charge—while supplies last.

Never miss a copy! Paid print subscriptions are available for 12 issues, 26 issues, and for 52 issues from the Reader Store.

Chicago Reader 2022 print issue dates

The Chicago Reader is published in print every other week. Issues are dated Thursday. Distribution usually happens Wednesday morning through Thursday night of the issue date. Upcoming print issue dates through December 2022 are:

9/15/20229/29/202210/13/202210/27/202211/10/202211/24/202212/8/202212/22/2022

Download the full 2022 editorial calendar is here (PDF).

See our information page for advertising opportunities.

2023 print issue dates

The first print issue in 2023 will be published three weeks after the 12/22/2022 issue, the final issue of 2022. The print issue dates through March 2023 are:

1/12/20231/26/20232/9/20232/23/20233/9/20233/23/2023

Related


[PRESS RELEASE] Baim stepping down as Reader publisher end of 2022


Chicago Reader hires social justice reporter

Debbie-Marie Brown fills this position made possible by grant funding from the Field Foundation.


[PRESS RELEASE] Lawyers for Social Justice Reception

Benefitting The Reader Institute for Community Journalism,
Publisher of the Chicago Reader

Read More

Get the Chicago Reader in print every other weekChicago Readeron September 7, 2022 at 9:57 pm Read More »

Bears vote Roquan Smith captain: ‘We know what he means to the team’

The persistent drama around linebacker Roquan Smith’s contract standoff with the Bears has no impact on what his teammates think of him. Production typically trumps everything, and Smith is arguably the best player on this team.

That’s why, after sitting out more than three weeks at the start of training camp, sparring publicly with general manager Ryan Poles and actively looking to leave this team, Smith won a captain spot in the players’ vote this week.

“We understood why he was missing practice — that’s the business side,” defensive end Robert Quinn said. “When he steps on the field or in meeting rooms, he’s locked in. He’s been a professional.

“Him missing the time, that’s strictly business… They don’t want to pay him, and he’s trying to get paid as much as he can. You can’t be mad at anyone for that. But when he does walk in, his presence is well received. And when the lights come on, you know he’s gonna be there.”

Players voted for Quinn and Smith on defense, and quarterback Justin Fields and stalwart left guard Cody Whitehair on offense. A fifth spot will be filled week-by-week, presumably by coach Matt Eberflus, starting with running back David Montgomery in the opener Sunday against the 49ers.

As the Bears rebuild under Poles and Eberflus, Smith will be pivotal to the defensive side of that project. He is one of the best, most versatile linebackers in the NFL and is entering his prime at 25. Poles recently said he still hopes to sign him to a contract extension despite how poorly negotiations have gone.

Eberflus compartmentalized seeing Smith skip 15 practices and two preseason games as just business. He knows how important Smith is this season, and possibly beyond, and fully supported him being picked as a captain.

“No question,” he said. “On the grass, man, he’s been great. He’s been great in the locker room and he’s been great with the coaches.

“The negotiations didn’t work out the way that he wanted to and that we wanted to… but he’s been A1 on the football side, the coaches side, teammate side — all that.”

Smith has said repeatedly since ending his “hold in” that he wants to shift his focus fully to the game as he plays out the final season of his rookie contract for $9.7 million and marches toward free agency.

But realistically, it’ll be impossible to separate his performance from the broader arc of his future with the Bears.

Smith is third in the NFL in tackles (524) since the Bears drafted him No. 8 overall in 2017. He also has 14 sacks and five interceptions and was voted second-team All-Pro each of the last two seasons.

If he builds off that this season, he’ll be making the case that he’s worthy of the nine-figure extension he sought. It’ll emphasize his criticism that Poles “doesn’t value me.” It might make him even more determined to leave.

And if he’s good but not great, Poles will be justified in holding firm in his offer. It’ll validate whatever points he made during negotiations when making clear why he didn’t want to pay Smith as much as elite linebackers Shaquille Leonard and Fred Warner got last summer.

Everything Smith does or doesn’t do will be part of that long-term equation. But for his teammates, all that matters is what they get from him in games.

“The way he works and the plays he makes — that’s about it,” safety Eddie Jackson said. “We know what type of player he is and what he means to the team.”

Read More

Bears vote Roquan Smith captain: ‘We know what he means to the team’ Read More »

Chicago Bears rookie WR not practicing with a hamstring injury

The Chicago Bears Wednesday injury report was interesting

The Chicago Bears have good and bad news from the team’s injury report released on Wednesday afternoon. Offensive lineman Lucas Patrick was not on the team’s injury list, but rookie wide receiver Velus Jones Jr. was one of two names on the report.

Jones was listed as having a hamstring injury. The 25-year-old rookie sustained a hamstring injury in college with Tennessee. The Bears need Jones to be healthy this season as the team lacks depth at the wide receiver position.

Patrick participated in drills Wednesday.

Bears center Patrick was back participating in drills Wednesday.

#Bears practice from Wednesday. That’s Lucas Patrick during individual drills. https://t.co/wUWrqcpEUa

Though he was seen in drills, per Courtney Cronin, quarterback Justin Fields has not been taking snaps with the veteran Patrick.

Fields said he has not taken a snap yet from Lucas Patrick after the center returned to practice earlier this week.

That will be something to keep an eye on as the Bears’ first regular season depth chart has Patrick as the team’s starting center. He won’t have much time to get reps with Fields before the team will play the San Francisco 49ers on Sunday.

For More Great Chicago Sports Content

Follow us on Twitter at @chicitysports23 for more great content. We appreciate you taking time to read our articles. To interact more with our community and keep up to date on the latest in Chicago sports news, JOIN OUR FREE FACEBOOK GROUP by CLICKING HERE

Read More

Chicago Bears rookie WR not practicing with a hamstring injury Read More »

High school football: AP Week 3 Illinois high school football rankings

The latest rankings of Illinois high school football teams in each class, according to an Associated Press panel of sportswriters:

Class 8ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. Loyola (11) (2-0) 118 1

2. Lincoln-Way East (1) (2-0) 108 2

3. Glenbard West (2-0) 94 3

4. Warren (2-0) 88 5

5. Naperville North (2-0) 65 9

6. O’Fallon (2-0) 45 8

7. Maine South (1-1) 36 7

8. Marist (1-1) 28 NR

9. Edwardsville (2-0) 26 10

10. Bolingbrook (1-1) 15 4

Others receiving votes: York 11, Lockport 7, Palatine 6, South Elgin 4, Plainfield North 3, Glenbrook South 3, Neuqua Valley 3.

Class 7ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. Mount Carmel (12) (2-0) 120 1

2. Prospect (2-0) 102 3

3. Batavia (1-1) 94 2

4. St. Rita (2-0) 76 5

5. Jacobs (2-0) 62 6

6. Glenbard North (1-1) 53 4

7. Wheaton North (2-0) 47 8

8. Wheaton-Warrenville South (1-1) 29 NR

9. Pekin (2-0) 22 T9

10. Hononegah (2-0) 16 NR

Others receiving votes: Brother Rice 14, Hersey 11, Geneva 6, Yorkville 5, Downers North 3.

Class 6ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. East St. Louis (13) (1-1) 130 1

2. Prairie Ridge (2-0) 108 2

3. Lemont (2-0) 99 4

4. Simeon (2-0) 96 T9

5. Notre Dame (2-0) 73 6

6. Crete-Monee (0-2) 65 5

7. Chatham Glenwood (2-0) 45 7

8. Kenwood (1-1) 33 T10

9. Cary-Grove (1-1) 23 3

10. Carmel (2-0) 21 NR

Others receiving votes: St. Ignatius 7, Harlem 5, Wauconda 4, Crystal Lake South 3, Normal West 2, Benet 1.

Class 5ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. Nazareth (9) (1-1) 116 1

2. Kankakee (1) (1-1) 94 2

3. Morris (2-0) 91 4

4. Mahomet-Seymour (2) (2-0) 90 3

5. Sycamore (2-0) 65 5

6. Peoria (2-0) 62 6

7. Rockford Boylan (2-0) 55 7

8. Morgan Park (2-0) 36 10

9. Glenbard South (2-0) 14 NR

10. Mascoutah (2-0) 10 NR

Others receiving votes: Sterling 9, St. Patrick 7, Highland 6, Marian Catholic 2, St. Viator 2, Fenwick 1.

Class 4ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. Sacred Heart-Griffin (6) (2-0) 105 T1

2. Joliet Catholic (5) (2-0) 104 T1

3. St. Francis (2-0) 85 3

4. Richmond-Burton (2-0) 73 4

5. Rochester (1-1) 66 5

6. Stillman Valley (2-0) 50 7

7. Genoa-Kingston (2-0) 42 6

8. Wheaton Academy (2-0) 36 8

9. Carterville (2-0) 15 10

10. Freeburg (2-0) 10 NR

Others receiving votes: St. Laurence 5, Peoria Notre Dame 5, Quincy Notre Dame 3, Marengo 3, Mt. Zion 2, Murphysboro 1.

Class 3ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. IC Catholic (9) (1-1) 117 1

2. Williamsville (2) (2-0) 100 3

2. Reed-Custer (1) (2-0) 100 2

4. Princeton (2-0) 81 4

5. Byron (1-1) 71 5

6. Mt. Carmel, Ill. (2-0) 51 6

7. Fairbury Prairie Central (2-0) 47 8

8. Eureka (2-0) 45 7

9. Durand-Pecatonica (2-0) 29 9

10. Peotone (2-0) 7 NR

(tie) Tolono Unity (1-1) 7 NR

Others receiving votes: Paxton-Buckley-Loda 5.

Class 2ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. Wilmington (11) (2-0) 119 1

2. St. Teresa (1) (2-0) 108 2

3. Downs Tri-Valley (2-0) 95 3

4. Maroa-Forsyth (2-0) 86 4

5. Bismarck-Henning (2-0) 63 6

6. Vandalia (2-0) 60 7

7. Knoxville (2-0) 49 10

8. North-Mac (2-0) 29 NR

9. Rockridge (1-1) 19 NR

10. Pana (1-1) 11 NR

Others receiving votes: Nashville 10, Breese Mater Dei 6, Mercer County 4, Johnston City 1.

Class 1ASchool W-L Pts Prv

1. Lena-Winslow (12) (2-0) 121 1

2. Athens (2-0) 112 2

3. Moweaqua Central A&M (1) (2-0) 104 3

4. Colfax Ridgeview (2-0) 90 4

5. Camp Point Central (2-0) 80 6

6. Fulton (2-0) 52 7

7. Tuscola (2-0) 31 8

8. Forreston (1-1) 30 5

9. Hope Academy (2-0) 28 T10

10. Gilman Iroquois West (2-0) 24 9

Others receiving votes: Jacksonville Routt 13, St. Bede 10, Greenfield-Northwestern 7, Annawan-Wethersfield 4, Salt Fork 4, Ottawa Marquette 2, Brown County 2, Shelbyville 1.

Read More

High school football: AP Week 3 Illinois high school football rankings Read More »