Videos

Don’t Worry Darling

The saying goes that all press is good press, but how true can that be if alleged drama surrounding a film overshadows the merits of the film itself? Olivia Wilde’s Don’t Worry Darling is the second movie to fall into this trap this summer, though it does manage to still bring on the thrills, mostly thanks to another potent performance from Florence Pugh. Her range is on full display as Alice, a 1950s housewife who begins to suspect that her husband’s company is up to something sinister within their utopian community. Alice, her husband, Jack (a dull but good enough Harry Styles), and all the company employees along with their wives live isolated from the rest of the world, hardly able to remember their lives from before they arrived. The only rule is that they stay within the company town, where they’re safe. Chris Pine delivers a disturbing performance that’s part televangelist and part cult leader, totally nailing that brand of big, inspiring speeches that seem poignant in delivery but are empty when you actually listen to the words being said. 

Piecing together what’s actually going on in this seemingly idyllic community proves tougher than expected, which primes for a tense twist in the final act, and the film’s introductory scenes are truly creepy as Alice begins to question her sanity, the world, and the people around her. The issue is in the middle: once Alice is convinced that something is wrong, the movie ought to pick up the pace to maintain momentum. Instead, it drudges on with a shot-by-shot repetitiveness that’s likely intentional but ends up being ineffective. There’s even a pump-fake twist and by this point, you’re begging for the real reveal to be, well, revealed. When the truth finally does come out, the explanation is interesting but flimsy, and after waiting so long to find out, it’s unsatisfying. Ultimately, Don’t Worry Darling boasts a (mostly) talented cast with a strong start but can’t follow through on its promises. R, 122 min.

Wide release in theaters

Read More

Don’t Worry Darling Read More »

AndorJosh Flanderson September 22, 2022 at 10:40 pm

In many ways, the new Star Wars series Andor follows the well-worn blueprint of the franchise: a scrappy main character with a childhood trauma, a planet-hopping quest, and a cute sidekick (in this case the stuttering droid B2EMO, or “Bee,” voiced by Dave Chapman). But the Lucasfilm spy thriller, filmed over two 12-episode seasons, veers off into more interesting territory. A prequel to Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, the Disney+ series follows Cassian Andor (Diego Luna) as he becomes involved in the political machinations behind the birth of the rebel alliance in the five years leading up to Rogue One, which (if you recall) is itself a prequel to Star Wars IV: A New Hope. The first four episodes have the sci-fi feel of Blade Runner—dark, dirty, and gritty, taking time to build out Andor’s world and various supporting characters, but often feeling more like a corporate workplace drama than an espionage show. Flashbacks to Andor’s childhood seem unnecessarily added, as if someone thought an origin of an origin of an origin of Star Wars was a good idea. How far back with origins do we need to go?! What about Andor’s great-grandparents’ second droid? Once Stellan Skarsgård’s Luthen Rael shows up to whisk him off world, and Senator Mon Mothma (Genevieve O’Reilly) returns in the fourth episode, the show feels like it’s about to find its legs, hinting at the political intrigue and backroom dealings that are to come. TV-14, 40-minute episodes

New episodes streaming weekly on Disney+

Read More

AndorJosh Flanderson September 22, 2022 at 10:40 pm Read More »

Catherine Called BirdyDmitry Samarovon September 22, 2022 at 10:40 pm

Based on Karen Cushman’s well-loved 1994 children’s novel, Lena Dunham presents a girl’s coming-of-age story set in 13th-century England. The sets and costumes look period-correct, but this is no attempt at historic verisimilitude à la Robert Eggers’s The Witch. Birdy is the kind of impossible, irreverent girl Dunham specializes in. Spoiled, defiant, but also capable of empathy beyond her years, she’s an almost prototypical heroine for a children’s book.

The plot turns on the family’s money problems, the solution being to marry Birdy off for as much of a dowry as she can command. Of course the girl fights this plan tooth and nail, sending a succession of suitors running away screaming. Using contemporary pop music and employing 2022 dialogue—albeit peppered with occasional medieval lingo—Dunham has fashioned a teen rom-com in period garb. It reminded me a bit of Sofia Coppola’s Marie Antoinette,though pitched to tweens. Those familiar with Dunham’s previous work will be surprised by the gentleness of approach and the conventionality of the story’s resolution. In the end, Birdy comes to terms with the need to do what’s best for her family and to grow up and become like everyone else. I was very aware while watching that as a 51-year-old man I was not who this was made for. But is it a good message to send young girls that they can be bad and do what they want for a little while but when the rubber hits the road they must toe the line? PG-13, 108 min.

Wide release in theaters andstreaming on Prime Video

Read More

Catherine Called BirdyDmitry Samarovon September 22, 2022 at 10:40 pm Read More »

Don’t Worry DarlingNoëlle D. Lilleyon September 22, 2022 at 10:40 pm

The saying goes that all press is good press, but how true can that be if alleged drama surrounding a film overshadows the merits of the film itself? Olivia Wilde’s Don’t Worry Darling is the second movie to fall into this trap this summer, though it does manage to still bring on the thrills, mostly thanks to another potent performance from Florence Pugh. Her range is on full display as Alice, a 1950s housewife who begins to suspect that her husband’s company is up to something sinister within their utopian community. Alice, her husband, Jack (a dull but good enough Harry Styles), and all the company employees along with their wives live isolated from the rest of the world, hardly able to remember their lives from before they arrived. The only rule is that they stay within the company town, where they’re safe. Chris Pine delivers a disturbing performance that’s part televangelist and part cult leader, totally nailing that brand of big, inspiring speeches that seem poignant in delivery but are empty when you actually listen to the words being said. 

Piecing together what’s actually going on in this seemingly idyllic community proves tougher than expected, which primes for a tense twist in the final act, and the film’s introductory scenes are truly creepy as Alice begins to question her sanity, the world, and the people around her. The issue is in the middle: once Alice is convinced that something is wrong, the movie ought to pick up the pace to maintain momentum. Instead, it drudges on with a shot-by-shot repetitiveness that’s likely intentional but ends up being ineffective. There’s even a pump-fake twist and by this point, you’re begging for the real reveal to be, well, revealed. When the truth finally does come out, the explanation is interesting but flimsy, and after waiting so long to find out, it’s unsatisfying. Ultimately, Don’t Worry Darling boasts a (mostly) talented cast with a strong start but can’t follow through on its promises. R, 122 min.

Wide release in theaters

Read More

Don’t Worry DarlingNoëlle D. Lilleyon September 22, 2022 at 10:40 pm Read More »

Bears-Texans podcast: Picking the winners

Patrick Finley, Jason Lieser and Mark Potash make their picks for the Bears-Texans game and debate why the offense can’t afford to run only 11 times on Sunday.

New episodes of “Halas Intrigue” will be published regularly with accompanying stories collected on the podcast’s hub page. You can also listen to “Halas Intrigue” wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Luminary, Spotify, and Stitcher.

Halas Intrigue Bears Report

Expert analysis and reporting before and after every Bears game, from the journalists who cover the Monsters of the Midway best.

Read More

Bears-Texans podcast: Picking the winners Read More »

Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews still committed to Blackhawks despite ‘disappointing’ moves

Patrick Kane’s phone was bombarded all summer by texts from friends and family, who couldn’t avoid seeing his name in trade rumors in every corner of the internet.

Was he going to this team? Maybe that team? Maybe this other one?

Kane could do nothing but chuckle about the firestorm. Even Thursday, speaking for the first time since April after wrapping up Day One of Hawks training camp, Kane regularly laughed — with a bit of exasperation thrown in — at the onslaught of questions about his future.

Because behind the scenes, at least as far as he admitted Thursday, not much has been going on at all.

“You pay attention to it a little bit at first, and then you kind of just block it out,” Kane said. “I think a lot of the rumors are just rumors and maybe [started by] people looking for things to talk about in August when nothing’s really going on with hockey, right?”

A few things are true. Kane was disheartened by the Alex DeBrincat draft-day trade to the Senators. Kane did sit down, after the draft, with Hawks general manager Kyle Davidson and associate GM Norm Maciver to discuss his and the organization’s future and bounce some questions (and answers) off each other. Kane is indeed aware he’s entering the last year of his contract.

But at the moment, the trade rumors are misleading: Kane is still a Hawk, through and through.

“There hasn’t been much discussion about anything, even with my agent or my parents or my family,” he said. “It’s not anything we’ve really discussed. We all know the situation…[with] what could potentially happen. It’s not really anything I’m thinking about as of yet, so we’ll see how it all plays out.

“Hopefully we can get off to a good start here and prove some people wrong. I know a lot of people are counting this team out, what we can do. But we have a lot of motivated players and a motivated coaching staff, as well.”

Roughly the same story applies to Jonathan Toews, as “boring” — his word — as it may be.

The Hawks captain did have a few discussions about his trade with his friends, family and his agent Pat Brisson (who also represents Kane) this summer, but hardly anything serious.

“I don’t think anything’s gotten to that point, or even close to it, over the summer,” Toews said. “I don’t think it will for quite some time this season. … The thought for myself personally has always been to kind of keep trudging forward and getting better.

“A lot of people are wondering and love to speculate and see what’s going to happen. I’m coming in here just fully excited to play hockey and not have any expectations. [I’m] not too concerned with what happens for me down the road this season or even beyond that.”

This story will be updated.

Read More

Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews still committed to Blackhawks despite ‘disappointing’ moves Read More »

Bears’ Trevis Gipson picking up where he left off

Trevis Gipson celebrated both of his sacks of Aaron Rodgers on Sunday night at Lambeau Field. But only in the moment.

“It felt good to get him, man. But I just couldn’t really soak it all in, because we lost the game,” Gipson said. “Those were good plays and obviously I took those into account in my game and what I can do and what’s successful for me. But it’s going to come down to us working as a team. When those plays do happen, we can soak ’em in more and appreciate them in a win.”

Gipson, a 2020 fifth-round draft pick who had seven sacks last season, is a key component of a pass rush that depends on the defensive line to pressure the quarterback. Matt Eberflus’ defenses with the Colts ranked last in the NFL in blitz percentage in 2021 (12.1%), 2020 (16.3%) and 2019 (13.7%) and 30th in 2018 (17%).

“We believe in the four-man rush,” Eberflus said. “We believe in dropping seven guys in coverage and having our four-man rush get pressure. We will pressure at times –certainly situationally and on first and second down –but that’s been our philosophy.

Gipson, 25, has been a pleasant surprise since he was drafted, emerging as a productive pass rusher following an apprenticeship season learning behind veterans Khalil Mack and Robert Quinn.

His flexibility and coach-ability have been keys to his opportunity and success. Though Gipson was a 4-3 defensive end at Tulsa, he transitioned into a 3-4 outside linebacker under Chuck Pagano and Sean Desai. And when Eberflus was hired, Gipson went back to being a 4-3 defensive end. So far, he looks like a good fit for this defense. And he has the perfect trait for success under Eberflus and defensive coordinator Alan Williams

“Positive attitude — that goes a long way,” Williams said when asked about Gipson’s developmental arc. “I know you’re probably alluding to athletic ability, but I never take the positive attitude and work ethic for granted –and those are two things that give him a chance to be a really good player.

“He’s long and he’s bought into our philosophy of how hard we play and how we run to the ball and he’s been productive, so that’s always a plus.”

That positive attitude is part of the H.I.T.S. philosophy that is the foundation of everything Eberflus and Willams do with their defense. It’s not just hustle and intensity, but perseverance.

“Early on, he may not have had as much production,” Williams said, “and he kept working at it. He kept coming in early. He stays late. Around here, what we want to do is preach the process and not be so product-oriented, so he did that — and we’re starting to see the fruits of his labor.”

Young pass rushers come and go in the NFL — some have immediate success they cannot sustain. Gipson has nine sacks in his last 16 games. Now comes the hard part — continuing to be effective when opponents are aware of you.

“It’s sort of not playing checkers, but chess. You always want to stay one move ahead,” said Gipson, an actual chess player.”I have shown some tendencies in my pass and run game that even my coaches have told me about, that I can mask a little bit more,” Gipson said. “That’s going to be one thing I try to focus on.

“As far as my pass rush, even if guys know what I’m going to do, it’s still going to be up to them to stop it. I’m going to have counters … and hopefully make success off of that.”

Read More

Bears’ Trevis Gipson picking up where he left off Read More »

Against Davis Mills, Bears ‘still gotta show up as if we are playing Aaron Rodgers’

Alan Williams insists that the Bears play a nameless, faceless opponent each week.

Davis Mills is no Aaron Rodgers, though. The Texans quarterback has 13 career starts. Rodgers has 208. Mills has two career wins; Rodgers seemingly beats the Bears twice each season.

Williams, the Bears’ defensive coordinator, said the Bears try not to think about the disparities between quarterbacks week-to-week –“We want the standard to stay high … no matter who we play,” he said –but he acknowledged the fact the Bears will try to show the second-year Mills something he’s never seen before Sunday at Soldier Field.

“We tried with Aaron Rodgers –don’t think we didn’t try,” he said. “He just, he has seen it, he has recognized it. And yes, maybe this quarterback may not –but we still approach it the same way.”

Mills “might not have the credibility of Aaron Rodgers,” defensive end Robert Quinn said, but the Bears have to beware nonetheless.

“We still gotta show up as if we are playing Aaron Rodgers,” he said. “Because any given Sunday, somebody can look like a Hall of Famer.

“Regardless of who the quarterback is, we still have to prepare as if he’s the best.”

While he’s no Rodgers, Mills is one of the best quarterbacks of the 2021 draft class. Statistically, he’s better, right now, than Bears quarterback Justin Fields. The more relevant question, though, is whether the Bears will be able to say the same at the end of the season.

Fields has loud tools that the Bears still need to help polish. Mills appears more fully-formed, though without the ceiling of the quarterbacks drafted ahead of him.

Long-term, Mills is probably not the quarterback the Texans will build their franchise around. The verdict is still out on Fields.

Mills played only 14 games at Stanford during a four-year career marred by knee injuries and the coronavirus. When the Texans drafted him with the first pick of Round 3, he became the eighth quarterback taken, behind first-rounders Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, Fields and Mac Jones, and second-rounders Kyle Trask and Kellen Mond.

Deshaun Watson deciding to sit out 2021, combined with Tyrod Taylor’s struggles to start the season, gave Mills an opportunity to start as a rookie. He got better as the season went on, totaling a 96.6 passer rating in December and a 102.3 over two games in January.

He has a much more underwhelming 80.8 passer rating in two games this season — a tie against the Colts and a seven-point loss at the Broncos. The Texans are leaning on Dameon Pierce, who has 26 carries this season. Mills described the Texans’ offense to reporters this week as a “ground and pound football team who’s going to make the defense have to play the run– but then when they do, let’s take some shots and move the football down the field.”

He’s done it well in his 13 career starts. Mills’ 87.6 passer rating trails only one other quarterback drafted in 2021, the Patriots’ Mac Jones. His 205.4 passing yards per game is behind only Jones and the Jaguars’ Trevor Lawrence.

Only Jones has thrown more than Mills’ 18 touchdowns. The only quarterback with fewer than Mills’ 10 interceptions have played about one-quarter as many snaps as he has –or less.

“He doesn’t throw a lot of interceptions if his first read isn’t there …” Bears cornerback Kindle Vildor said. “He’s very careful with the ball. He’s very good at what he does. … He’s a starter there, so they believe in him and things he can do. He’s a good game manager.”

Most importantly, he’s not Rodgers.

Read More

Against Davis Mills, Bears ‘still gotta show up as if we are playing Aaron Rodgers’ Read More »

Justin Fields doesn’t owe Chicago Bears fans anything, periodRyan Heckmanon September 22, 2022 at 9:30 pm

Week 2 was just another Chicago Bears game against the Green Bay Packers. It ended similarly to the majority of these matchups over the past decade — in defeat.

To say anyone expected the Bears to actually beat Green Bay would mean those people were lying to themselves. The Bears were never going to win this game, but there were definitely some concerns which arose.

Quarterback Justin Fields had a tough game, and a lot of it was on his shoulders and not the play-calling. He did hold the ball too long. He did miss on some reads. But, what’s a young quarterback to do?

Fields is essentially still a rookie, not having played a full 17 games yet in his career. With that comes rookie mistakes, both on and off the field.

Speaking of which, Fields spoke to the media immediately after the loss to Green Bay and was visibly frustrated. He was quoted with saying the following:

“Yeah. It hurts more in the locker room than the Bears fans. At the end of the day, they aren’t putting in any work. I see the guys in the locker room every day. I see how much work they put in. Coming out of a disappointing loss like this, it hurts.”

Justin Fields’ words irritated many Chicago Bears fans, but at the end of the day, he doesn’t owe them anything.

After Fields said what he said regarding Bears fans, many people took the quote and ran in a direction which led to Fields’ name being smeared through the mud.

The quote was absolutely taken out of context. Of course, Fields did not mean to disrespect Bears fans. He’s not stupid. He understands the fans are the ones who support the team the most, especially from their own wallets.

But, a few different outlets took that quote and spun it in a way that could have damaged his reputation.

Then, on Wednesday, Fields met with the media again and had this to say in response to the uproar:

“What I meant by that is I’m talking about work regarding the game on Sunday, winning the game. I don’t know any fans. I don’t know what they’re doing in their personal lives. I respect every fan that we have. I’m glad that we have fans. I would never disrespect anybody on what they do or what they love to do. It came off like that. Some social media outlets, they quoted my quote and they got a big buzz out of it. So, of course they did a great job doing that. Of course social media is going to do that. But I just wanted to clear that up.”

First of all, good on Fields for ensuring he brought this story full circle. His presser was genuine. Watching it in full, you certainly got that vibe. He was respectful, humble and came across as being very genuine.

But, let’s clear something up here.

Justin Fields does not owe Chicago Bears fans a thing — period.

To say that the Bears would be nothing without the fans is both true and untrue. But, let’s just cut to the chase, here.

The fans that got angry about this quote clearly assumed the worst. Instead of giving the guy the benefit of the doubt, these fans went straight for the jugular.

In reality, Fields didn’t say anything wrong. He was absolutely right with what he said.

Fans do not wake up early and train at Halas Hall.

Fans do not study the playbook tirelessly.

Fans do not attend film sessions.

Fans do not put in work in the weight room.

Fans do not participate in practice.

Fans do not have their hand in coaching, or any part of the staff for that matter.

Fans are just fans — and that’s coming from a die-hard Bears fan, here. I am smart enough to realize that I do not put in the work.

Fans choose to purchase tickets, memorabilia and apparel. That is a choice. Fields, meanwhile, is under a contract and goes to work every day. This is a career. This is his occupation.

Fans have a choice to participate in being a fan and putting money into buying jerseys, hats, tickets, food, drinks, etc. That is a choice. They do not owe it to Fields to buy his jersey or attend his games. Those are both choices.

Fields’ job is to be the quarterback of the Chicago Bears and to put in all the required work in order to do his job to the best of his ability. So, with that said, here’s a message to the fans still upset about Fields’ post-game quote:

Quit whining.

Read More

Justin Fields doesn’t owe Chicago Bears fans anything, periodRyan Heckmanon September 22, 2022 at 9:30 pm Read More »

Clyde’s shows off the sunnier side of Sweat

Let’s get this out of the way immediately: any similarities between Lynn Nottage’s Clyde’s, now in its local premiere at the Goodman, and the Hulu series The Bear are purely coincidental. (Honestly? Though I’ve read several essays about it, I haven’t watched the latter yet. I know!) Yes, they are both set in the kitchen of a sandwich restaurant, where tempers flare as pressure mounts. But Nottage’s play, which had its world premiere in New York in 2021 and earned five Tony Award nominations, is a sequel of sorts to her Pulitzer Prize-winning Rust Belt drama Sweat (seen at the Goodman in 2019). 

Yet the world of Clyde’s, the truck-stop cafe run by the eponymous tough-as-nails proprietress, is in a different tonal universe than Nottage’s earlier play. Which is just a fancy way of saying, “It’s a comedy!”

Clyde’s Through 10/9: Wed 7:30 PM, Thu 2 and 7:30 PM, Fri 8 PM, Sat 2 and 8 PM, Sun 2 PM; also Sun 9/25 and Tue 10/4 7:30 PM; ASL interpretation Fri 10/7 8 PM, Spanish subtitles Sat 10/8 8 PM, open captions Sun 10/9 2 PM; Goodman Theatre, 170 N. Dearborn, 312-443-3800, goodmantheatre.org, $25-$80

As Nottage told me in an interview last spring when Sweat was in a revival at Aurora’s Paramount Theatre, “It’s very much in conversation with Sweat, but it’s an entirely different work, and you don’t need to have familiarity with Sweat to be able to enjoy Clyde’s. It’s set in a sandwich shop on a not-so-traveled stretch of road just outside of Reading. And I describe it as a liminal space. It’s a space that you only find if you’re taking a detour.”

The detours for Clyde’s employees involved stretches of incarceration, and the most direct link to Sweat is that Jason (Garrett Young), the newest member of the kitchen crew, has just been released from prison for a near-fatal assault that formed the dramatic climax for the earlier play. He’s covered with white-power tats that he claims he got only as a survival measure while in lockup. (His walking-health-department-violation habit of wiping his nose as he prepares food is thus only the second-most-disturbing thing about him.)

But Jason, like everyone else sweating it out under Clyde’s watchful eye, wants to do better. And Montrellous (Kevin Kenerly), the “sandwich sensei” whose creations are far above standard truck-stop fare, wants that for everyone. He serves up garnishes of hard-won wisdom alongside the produce from the garden he’s growing out back. “And you know what they say, cuz you left prison don’t mean you outta prison. But, remember everything we do here is to escape that mentality. This kitchen, these ingredients, these are our tools. We have what we need. So, let’s cook.”

And he’d love to help Clyde blossom, too—but as she tells him from the first scene, “I’m not indifferent to suffering. But I don’t do pity. I just don’t. And you know why? Because dudes like you thrive on it, it’s your energy source, but like fossil fuels it creates pollution.”

Clyde herself is a former convict, but she’s not hiring paroled folks out of altruism. Instead, she knows that workers who don’t have many options aren’t likely to cause problems for management. As played by the magnificent understudy Danielle Davis at Monday’s opening (stepping in for De’Adre Aziza), she’s monstrously and hilariously blunt, routinely pouring out generous portions of sharp sour don’t-give-a-damn sauce to counter the nurturing savory warmth offered up by Kenerly’s Montrellous. 

As directed by longtime Nottage collaborator Kate Whoriskey, this show is a palate-cleansing look at the working class that doesn’t treat them purely as victims or helpless cogs in the wheel. In doing so, it trades high-stakes plot development in favor of slice-of-life character study. A glowing review in a local paper seems to offer some Mystic Pizza possibilities for Clyde’s to go upscale, but that notion is shot down by the lady who owns the place (and apparently owes money to some rather dangerous types that we never meet). 

So instead we spend time getting to know more about the people who labor under Clyde’s histrionic demands. In addition to Montrellous and Jason, there’s Letitia (Nedra Snipes), whose problems with finding reliable childcare for her disabled daughter offer a poignant snapshot of how juggling work and family means something entirely different when you’re a paycheck away from disaster, rather than stressing over finding the perfect live-in nanny. There’s also Rafael (Reza Salazar), who carries a torch for Letitia and a desire to match Montrellous’s culinary skills. “I’m the sous chef, bitch!” he yells at Jason early on, and it’s clear it’s not really Jason he’s trying to convince of his worth, but himself. 

The road that runs through Clyde’s has obviously been a harsh one. But the kitchen quartet finds sustenance in each other, even through their arguments and reminders of their troubled pasts. No matter how much their boss tries to shit on their dreams, there’s quiet beauty in the way they learn to work together and listen to each other. Clyde’s version of perseverance is rooted in going it alone and stomping out anyone she suspects will drag her down. (In this way, she’s not unlike Mama Nadi, the harsh Congolese madam and bar owner in Nottage’s other Pulitzer Prize-winning play, Ruined.) The beauty of Nottage’s world, which she’s shown us in so many plays both comic and tragic over the years, is that it refuses cheap cynicism and nihilism. We’re all we’ve got on the road to nowhere. Let’s make the best of it. And as Warren Zevon once said, “Enjoy every sandwich.”

Read More

Clyde’s shows off the sunnier side of Sweat Read More »