Videos

Get a print copy of this week’s Chicago ReaderChicago Readeron October 12, 2022 at 5:01 pm

Distribution map

The Chicago Reader is published in print every other week and distributed free to the 1,100 locations on this map (which can also be opened in a separate window or tab). Copies are available free of charge—while supplies last.

The latest issue

The most recent print issue is this week’s issue of October 13, 2022. It is being distributed to locations today, Wednesday, October 12, through tomorrow, Thursday, October 13.

Download a free PDF of the print issue.

Many Reader boxes including downtown and transit line locations will be restocked on the Wednesday following each issue date.

The next issue

The next print issue is the issue of October 27. It will be distributed to locations Wednesday, October 26, through Thursday night, October 27.

Never miss a copy! Paid print subscriptions are available for 12 issues, 26 issues, and for 52 issues from the Reader Store.

Chicago Reader 2022 print issue dates

The Chicago Reader is published in print every other week. Issues are dated Thursday. Distribution usually happens Wednesday morning through Thursday night of the issue date. Upcoming print issue dates through December 2022 are:

10/27/202211/10/202211/24/202212/8/202212/22/2022

Download the full 2022 editorial calendar is here (PDF).

See our information page for advertising opportunities.

2023 print issue dates

The first print issue in 2023 will be published three weeks after the 12/22/2022 issue, the final issue of 2022. The print issue dates through June 2023 are:

1/12/20231/26/20232/9/20232/23/20233/9/20233/23/20234/6/20234/20/20235/4/20235/18/20236/1/20236/15/20236/29/2023

Related


Enrique Limón named Editor in Chief of Chicago Reader

Limón will start October 3.


[PRESS RELEASE] Baim stepping down as Reader publisher end of 2022


Chicago Reader hires social justice reporter

Debbie-Marie Brown fills this position made possible by grant funding from the Field Foundation.

Read More

Get a print copy of this week’s Chicago ReaderChicago Readeron October 12, 2022 at 5:01 pm Read More »

Why would a survivor of sexual trauma want D/s kink?Dan Savageon October 12, 2022 at 5:36 pm

Q: I’m a 31-year-old cis man married to a 33-year-old nonbinary partner, and our relationship has always been very vanilla. Over the past few years, I’ve discovered that I’m a kinky person, with a particular interest in both domination and submission. It took me a long time to summon the courage to bring this up with my spouse, as they have a cocktail of factors that could complicate play around power dynamics. This includes a history of trauma and sexual abuse, anxiety, body image and self-esteem issues, and residual religious guilt. In the past, even discussing sex and sexuality in the abstract has been fraught. But our first conversation went surprisingly well. My spouse is cautiously open to exploring submission, and they want to continue the conversation. I have real optimism that centering consent, boundaries, and communication in D/s play might actually make sex feel safer for them. And I hope that isn’t just dickful thinking.

So, now I’m the dog that caught the car and I’m terrified of messing this up. What advice would you give to gently ease into D/s play from a vanilla relationship? Can you recommend any books or podcasts that approach this kink at a firmly JV level and center safety and consent? My spouse is a reader and an academic at heart, and that might be a way to explore the idea from within their comfort zone. —Don’t Overwhelm My Spouse

A: “Let me address the elephant in the room right away,” said Rena Martine. “Why on earth would a survivor of sexual trauma actually want to engage in D/s sex?”

Martine is a sexual intimacy coach who has helped couples explore BDSM and other forms of erotic power exchange. She’s also a former sex crimes prosecutor, which makes her particularly sensitive to issues faced by survivors of sexual assault and abuse.

“When it comes to trauma, there’s a concept known as ‘restaging,’” said Martine, “which means the trauma survivor takes a situation where they felt powerless and ‘restages’ it, so they’re actually in the director’s chair and choosing to give up some of that control.”

While BDSM isn’t therapy, some people who have submissive desires and traumatic sexual histories find giving up control to a trusted partner empowering and low-key therapeutic. Instead of control being something an untrustworthy abuser took from them, control becomes a precious thing they loaned to someone they could trust. And when they handed it over, they knew it would be returned, either at a set time or immediately if the sub used their safe word.

“Research by Dr. Justin Lehmiller tells us that victims of sex crimes are actually more likely than nonvictims to fantasize about almost all aspects of BDSM,” added Martine. “Anyone who’s curious about the science of sexual fantasies should read his book, Tell Me What You Want. And Holly Richmond’s Reclaiming Pleasure is a great starting point for any sexual assault survivor.”

Before you attempt to engage in D/s play or even begin to discuss your fantasies in detail, Martine recommends thinking about the emotional needs that shape these fantasies. 

“What is it about domination and submission that appeals to each of them?” Martine said. “What aspects of D/S play are they excited about? Having a conversation about the ‘why’ will ensure they can each approach this new dynamic from a place of compassion and safety.”

Now, if you give thought to the “why,” DOMS, and your honest answer is, “Because it turns me on,” that’s good enough. And if your spouse’s honest answer is, “Because my partner is interested in this and I’m interested in exploring it,” that’s good enough. While some people into BDSM can point to one specific experience or something that shaped them more broadly (like a religious upbringing), you don’t need to justify your interest in D/s or BDSM by making a list of traumatic experiences. If this kind of play—this kind of theater for two—turns you both on, that’s a perfectly valid reason to explore D/s play.

As for getting started, Martine had a really good suggestion. 

“My favorite newbie recommendation for easing into D/S play is using a sleep mask,” said Martine. “It’s innocuous, easy to remove, and gives each player a chance to practice surrendering control by giving up one of their five senses.”

Taking a baby step like that—playing with a simple blindfold and nothing else—is a great way to test the waters while you keep talking about other “junior varsity” kinks you and your spouse feel safe exploring together.

“And for general D/s tips,” said Martine, “check out Lina Dune’s Ask A Sub podcast.”

Follow Rena Martine on Instagram @_rena.martine_.

Q: I’m a hetero 40-year-old woman, married to a guy who is very skilled and generous in bed. I’m also someone who absolutely needs to be in control of my body. I’ve never done drugs and only once got so drunk I didn’t remember every detail of the night. I hated that feeling. I think this need for control is why I don’t like having orgasms. I enjoy the feeling that comes immediately before an orgasm but then my body seems to suppress that last bit. Because I don’t enjoy the feeling of actual orgasms, this is fine with me. On the very rare occasions that I’ve had an orgasm, I feel gross after. But I could happily screw all night with no orgasm! I’ve discussed this with my husband, and he said that as long as I was having my best experience, he was not upset that I wasn’t having orgasms. But a friend—a friend I don’t have sex with—is convinced my aversion is a symptom of some sort of emotional scar. I did have some negative sexual experiences in the past, but I dealt with them and moved on. Should I explore this aversion even though the only person concerned is someone I don’t have sex with? Or can I be an emotionally whole person who just prefers the pre-gasm to orgasm? —Personally Prefer Pre-gasms

A: It doesn’t sound like . . .

There is more to this week’s Savage Love. To read the entire column, go to Savage.Love

Read More

Why would a survivor of sexual trauma want D/s kink?Dan Savageon October 12, 2022 at 5:36 pm Read More »

Bears OL Alex Leatherwood returns to practice

One month after putting him on the reserve/non-football illness list because of mononucleosis, the Bears returned Raiders offensive lineman Alex Leatherwood to practice Wednesday.

Leatherwood has three weeks to return to the active roster. He’s unlikely to do so Thursday night, when the Bears host the Commanders at Soldier Field.

Leatherwood could eventually develop into a starting option for a Bears offensive line that is playing without starting left guard Cody Whitehair, who went on injured reserve last week after hurting his knee against the Giants.

The Raiders drafted Leatherwood in the first round out of Alabama last year and pegged him for tackle. When he struggled early in the season, the Raiders moved him to right guard in Week 5. He started there for the rest of the year.

The Raiders’ new brass released Leatherwood on cut day. The Bears claimed him and inherited his three-year, $5.9 million contract. The Bears put him on the NFI list on Sept. 14.

Read More

Bears OL Alex Leatherwood returns to practice Read More »

Chicago Bears Looking At Former First Team All-Big Ten Player Before Week 6 game

The Chicago Bears might be in the market for a punter

The Chicago Bears added important value to their special teams in the draft. General manager Ryan Poles used critical draft capital in the third round with return specialist Velus Jones Jr. and the seventh round with punter Trenton Gill.

Gill has performed well as a punter in his rookie season. He has the seventh-highest punt average (49.2 yards), but he ranks in the lower tier in the NFL for punts inside the 20-yard line. Gill is ranked as the 16th-best punter on Pro Football Focus, with an overall score of 69.7.

Even with Gill playing decently well at punter, the Bears are keeping an eye on other players at the position. According to Aaron Wilson with the Pro Football Network, the Bears tried out punter Ryan Anderson this week.

Anderson won awards in college

Anderson punted for Rutgers in college. He made first-team All-Big Ten honors in 2017. Anderson won The Eddleman-Fields Punter of the year as well in 2017. The New York Giants signed him in 2019 for their rookie minicamp, but he was later waived in August of that year. It’ll be intriguing to see if the Chicago Bears would like to take a chance on the former Big Ten star punter.

For More Great Chicago Sports Content

Follow us on Twitter at @chicitysports23 for more great content. We appreciate you taking time to read our articles. To interact more with our community and keep up to date on the latest in Chicago sports news, JOIN OUR FREE FACEBOOK GROUP by CLICKING HERE

Read More

Chicago Bears Looking At Former First Team All-Big Ten Player Before Week 6 game Read More »

Listen to The Ben Joravsky Show

Reader senior writer Ben Joravsky riffs on the day’s stories with his celebrated humor, insight, and honesty, and interviews politicians, activists, journalists and other political know-it-alls. Presented by the Chicago Reader, the show is available by 4 p.m. Tuesdays through Fridays at chicagoreader.com/joravsky—or wherever you get your podcasts. Don’t miss Oh, What a Week!–the Friday feature in which Ben & producer Dennis (aka, Dr. D.) review the week’s top stories. Also, bonus interviews drop on Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays. 

Chicago Reader podcasts are recorded on Shure microphones. Learn more at Shure.com.

With support from our sponsors

Chicago Reader senior writer Ben Joravsky discusses the day’s stories with his celebrated humor, insight, and honesty on The Ben Joravsky Show.


MAGA flip-flops

Men from Blago to Bolduc are trying to sing a new song.


Just like we told you

The Bears finally make their play for public money to build their private stadium.


The choice is yours, voters

MAGA’s Illinois Supreme Court nominees are poised to outlaw abortion in Illinois—if, gulp, they win.

Read More

Listen to The Ben Joravsky Show Read More »

Tough calls

Two years ago, when my brother in Michigan stopped taking his meds and relapsed, I had to decide if I was going to call the police and request a wellness check from two states away. I hadn’t heard from him in almost a day, and while the break from the frightening verbal abuse that accompanies his particular breakdowns was welcome, I was also increasingly worried. He’d attempted suicide during relapses before, he owned over a dozen guns, and he was alone.

In the end, I didn’t call: I was terrified of the cops showing up and shooting him. I was terrified of him shooting someone else. He needed someone who could reach the bowels of paranoia and hallucination he’d gone to, and de-escalate what could be a dangerous situation, but this “someone” didn’t exist.

From 2019-2021, police responded to calls requesting wellness checks, reporting suicide threats, or generally asking for help for someone in a mental health by shooting and killing at least 178 of the “very people they were called on to assist,” according to a June 2022 report from the Washington Post. A recent investigation by the Invisible Institute’s Kelsey Turner on police use of force and involuntary commitment in mental health cases noted, “people with serious mental illness experience police use of force at 11.6 times the rate of those without mental illness.”

That January night two years ago, gripping my phone in my sweating palm, it wasn’t the statistics on death and arrest that haunted me—it was the stories. A sister in Pennsylvania called the police after her brother, who was schizophrenic and bipolar, punched a car and tried to break into her home. “He needs help,” she said, and requested that they take her brother to a hospital. Instead, officers shot Ricardo Muñoz four times.

In Colorado, a man received delusional texts from his depressed, combat veteran brother 800 miles away in Texas. He didn’t trust the police to check on him without violence, so instead, he called the Red Cross. But the Red Cross called the police, who shot Damian Daniels twice in the chest.

One Sunday morning in Detroit, a man made a 5 AM phone call. His brother, who had a long history of mental illness, was in crisis: “He’s frantic and he has a knife. I’m concerned for people,” he said. Shortly after their arrival, five officers fired 38 rounds in three seconds, killing Porter Burke.

“If anyone out there has a family member or a loved one (in crisis), help them yourself,” Burke’s aunt, Michele Wilson, told reporters. “Don’t call 911; they might not make it.”

Just like those who do not have mental illness, some people with mental illness occasionally behave violently; most do not. To flatten and diminish people with mental illness into “criminal” or “non-criminal,” as the CPD still does, is to steal from them their humanity, in all its complexity, nuance, and possibility for change. In crisis, my brother has been violent toward family members before. I have no idea what part of that is his responsibility and what isn’t. I don’t know what burgeons up from his paranoia and despair. All I know is I don’t want him dead.

In the end, I bluffed my brother, and it worked. After 18 hours of unanswered messages and calls, I texted an ultimatum and a deadline: let me know you’re still alive by noon, or I’m calling the cops. “[I’m] fucking fine don’t fucking call the police,” he texted back, and there I had it: proof of life. I didn’t call for the wellness check.

Our loved one’s death or forced removal from our community are the risks we take, us lovers and roommates, siblings and parents, of the seriously mentally ill, if we call for “help.” But we need help, desperately.

Last Thursday, I sat in my friend J’s tent with him and a woman who kept up a constant, low murmur of conversation with someone only she could see. She smoked crack out of a broken pipe as she talked; several hospital patient bracelets circled her wrist.

J was frustrated and worried. He’d met the woman, who I’ll call S, the day before, wandering the South Loop barefoot, her eyes wide and straining. Having been in a psych ward a few times himself, after asking S her name, her age, and where she was from, J had asked her if she’d been given any psych meds at the hospital. S said yes. “Are you taking them now?” J asked. “No,” she said, then “ultrasound,” and raised her sweatshirt to reveal her pale, pregnant belly.

S followed him as he walked, across a busy city highway and right into his tent. He gave her his cot and slept on the ground. Today, in an effort to keep her safe, J was sticking by her side, but this vigilance came at the expense of his own well-being. If J couldn’t leave the tent, he wasn’t panhandling, which meant he wasn’t managing his own addiction or eating any food.

I asked S if there was anyone I could call for her: she said no. Texting with a Night Ministry outreach worker, I asked her if I could take her picture to share with him; she said no. The outreach worker, hustling my messages to the right people, replied that the evening outreach team would try to make contact with S at J’s tent between 4 and 6 PM. It was 2 PM. Because neither J nor S had a phone or a watch with which to track time, S’s best bet was to stay put. Out of options, I gave everyone clean pipes and multiple Big Macs.

J came with me on the McDonald’s run. “Don’t go through my stuff again,” he admonished S as we left, “and if you go outside, put on your shoes.” The area he stays in, full of rose bushes gone wild, is a shooting gallery, a secluded outdoor spot where people go to inject drugs in relative safety. Forced to operate swiftly and with no city sanitation support, drug users discard their needles on the ground, and J was worried S would get poked.

At the McDonald’s, he vented. “I don’t know what to do, man,” he said. “I want to help take care of her, but I don’t know how long she should stay.” In the end, there was nothing more he could do: when he woke up early Friday morning, S was gone.

J’s dilemma was different from the one I had faced with my brother—S was a stranger to him, and as an unhoused person who uses drugs, J risked his own freedom and safety if he called the police—but ultimately the outcome was the same: there was no one he could call for immediate help who wouldn’t send a police officer.

Various efforts to bring people other than cops to mental health crises have advanced around the country: crisis-intervention programs have rolled out in recent years in Kentucky, Tennessee, New York, and California. A Denver initiative that began sending mental health specialists instead of police to crises in 2020 has even been correlated with a decrease in low-level crime.

In July, the national 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline debuted, offering an alternative to calling 911. An analysis by WBEZ and MindSite News noted that most Illinois calls still go to out-of-state call centers, which can reduce responders’ familiarity with local resources available to callers.

Last year, Chicago started a program dubbed Crisis Assistance Response and Engagement (CARE), which sends a team comprising a paramedic, a mental health clinician, and a police officer to 911 calls involving mental health crises. Still in its pilot phase, CARE operates in select areas of the city, and only between 10:30 AM and 4 PM on weekdays.

The police department also has “Crisis Intervention Team officers,” police who have attended 40 hours of training in “the signs and symptoms of mental illness” and “how to interact, intervene, and de-escalate situations with persons in crisis.” 911 callers can specifically request a CIT officer. But they’re still cops, and still bring guns to mental health crises. In addition, according to the Policy Surveillance Program, police officers can initiate involuntary commitments in 28 states, including Illinois.

Our loved one’s death or forced removal from our community are the risks we take, us lovers and roommates, siblings and parents, of the seriously mentally ill, if we call for “help.” But we need help, desperately. For decades, my family has tried to provide my brother with the kind of care and first response our society won’t. If our love and labor alone could keep him safe and well, it would’ve worked already. Instead, it’s quite literally making us sick.

Love might be unconditional, but our own relationships and jobs, our own safety, the health of our own minds and bodies, have their limits. I understand why people make that call, despite knowing who it will summon and the potential violence those called will bring. I, too, have held my phone in my hand, weighing options that offer too few choices—and too many risks.


Significant issues remain around police use of involuntary commitments.


Thousands have survived one pandemic winter, only to now face another, still waiting for shelters to have spaces for them, to hear their names called for a public housing unit.


Pariahs amid the rainbow: young, queer, and homeless in Boystown

Read More

Tough calls Read More »

Listen to The Ben Joravsky ShowBen Joravskyon October 12, 2022 at 7:02 am

Reader senior writer Ben Joravsky riffs on the day’s stories with his celebrated humor, insight, and honesty, and interviews politicians, activists, journalists and other political know-it-alls. Presented by the Chicago Reader, the show is available by 4 p.m. Tuesdays through Fridays at chicagoreader.com/joravsky—or wherever you get your podcasts. Don’t miss Oh, What a Week!–the Friday feature in which Ben & producer Dennis (aka, Dr. D.) review the week’s top stories. Also, bonus interviews drop on Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays. 

Chicago Reader podcasts are recorded on Shure microphones. Learn more at Shure.com.

With support from our sponsors

Chicago Reader senior writer Ben Joravsky discusses the day’s stories with his celebrated humor, insight, and honesty on The Ben Joravsky Show.


MAGA flip-flops

Men from Blago to Bolduc are trying to sing a new song.


Just like we told you

The Bears finally make their play for public money to build their private stadium.


The choice is yours, voters

MAGA’s Illinois Supreme Court nominees are poised to outlaw abortion in Illinois—if, gulp, they win.

Read More

Listen to The Ben Joravsky ShowBen Joravskyon October 12, 2022 at 7:02 am Read More »

Tough callsKatie Prouton October 12, 2022 at 3:52 pm

Two years ago, when my brother in Michigan stopped taking his meds and relapsed, I had to decide if I was going to call the police and request a wellness check from two states away. I hadn’t heard from him in almost a day, and while the break from the frightening verbal abuse that accompanies his particular breakdowns was welcome, I was also increasingly worried. He’d attempted suicide during relapses before, he owned over a dozen guns, and he was alone.

In the end, I didn’t call: I was terrified of the cops showing up and shooting him. I was terrified of him shooting someone else. He needed someone who could reach the bowels of paranoia and hallucination he’d gone to, and de-escalate what could be a dangerous situation, but this “someone” didn’t exist.

From 2019-2021, police responded to calls requesting wellness checks, reporting suicide threats, or generally asking for help for someone in a mental health by shooting and killing at least 178 of the “very people they were called on to assist,” according to a June 2022 report from the Washington Post. A recent investigation by the Invisible Institute’s Kelsey Turner on police use of force and involuntary commitment in mental health cases noted, “people with serious mental illness experience police use of force at 11.6 times the rate of those without mental illness.”

That January night two years ago, gripping my phone in my sweating palm, it wasn’t the statistics on death and arrest that haunted me—it was the stories. A sister in Pennsylvania called the police after her brother, who was schizophrenic and bipolar, punched a car and tried to break into her home. “He needs help,” she said, and requested that they take her brother to a hospital. Instead, officers shot Ricardo Muñoz four times.

In Colorado, a man received delusional texts from his depressed, combat veteran brother 800 miles away in Texas. He didn’t trust the police to check on him without violence, so instead, he called the Red Cross. But the Red Cross called the police, who shot Damian Daniels twice in the chest.

One Sunday morning in Detroit, a man made a 5 AM phone call. His brother, who had a long history of mental illness, was in crisis: “He’s frantic and he has a knife. I’m concerned for people,” he said. Shortly after their arrival, five officers fired 38 rounds in three seconds, killing Porter Burke.

“If anyone out there has a family member or a loved one (in crisis), help them yourself,” Burke’s aunt, Michele Wilson, told reporters. “Don’t call 911; they might not make it.”

Just like those who do not have mental illness, some people with mental illness occasionally behave violently; most do not. To flatten and diminish people with mental illness into “criminal” or “non-criminal,” as the CPD still does, is to steal from them their humanity, in all its complexity, nuance, and possibility for change. In crisis, my brother has been violent toward family members before. I have no idea what part of that is his responsibility and what isn’t. I don’t know what burgeons up from his paranoia and despair. All I know is I don’t want him dead.

In the end, I bluffed my brother, and it worked. After 18 hours of unanswered messages and calls, I texted an ultimatum and a deadline: let me know you’re still alive by noon, or I’m calling the cops. “[I’m] fucking fine don’t fucking call the police,” he texted back, and there I had it: proof of life. I didn’t call for the wellness check.

Our loved one’s death or forced removal from our community are the risks we take, us lovers and roommates, siblings and parents, of the seriously mentally ill, if we call for “help.” But we need help, desperately.

Last Thursday, I sat in my friend J’s tent with him and a woman who kept up a constant, low murmur of conversation with someone only she could see. She smoked crack out of a broken pipe as she talked; several hospital patient bracelets circled her wrist.

J was frustrated and worried. He’d met the woman, who I’ll call S, the day before, wandering the South Loop barefoot, her eyes wide and straining. Having been in a psych ward a few times himself, after asking S her name, her age, and where she was from, J had asked her if she’d been given any psych meds at the hospital. S said yes. “Are you taking them now?” J asked. “No,” she said, then “ultrasound,” and raised her sweatshirt to reveal her pale, pregnant belly.

S followed him as he walked, across a busy city highway and right into his tent. He gave her his cot and slept on the ground. Today, in an effort to keep her safe, J was sticking by her side, but this vigilance came at the expense of his own well-being. If J couldn’t leave the tent, he wasn’t panhandling, which meant he wasn’t managing his own addiction or eating any food.

I asked S if there was anyone I could call for her: she said no. Texting with a Night Ministry outreach worker, I asked her if I could take her picture to share with him; she said no. The outreach worker, hustling my messages to the right people, replied that the evening outreach team would try to make contact with S at J’s tent between 4 and 6 PM. It was 2 PM. Because neither J nor S had a phone or a watch with which to track time, S’s best bet was to stay put. Out of options, I gave everyone clean pipes and multiple Big Macs.

J came with me on the McDonald’s run. “Don’t go through my stuff again,” he admonished S as we left, “and if you go outside, put on your shoes.” The area he stays in, full of rose bushes gone wild, is a shooting gallery, a secluded outdoor spot where people go to inject drugs in relative safety. Forced to operate swiftly and with no city sanitation support, drug users discard their needles on the ground, and J was worried S would get poked.

At the McDonald’s, he vented. “I don’t know what to do, man,” he said. “I want to help take care of her, but I don’t know how long she should stay.” In the end, there was nothing more he could do: when he woke up early Friday morning, S was gone.

J’s dilemma was different from the one I had faced with my brother—S was a stranger to him, and as an unhoused person who uses drugs, J risked his own freedom and safety if he called the police—but ultimately the outcome was the same: there was no one he could call for immediate help who wouldn’t send a police officer.

Various efforts to bring people other than cops to mental health crises have advanced around the country: crisis-intervention programs have rolled out in recent years in Kentucky, Tennessee, New York, and California. A Denver initiative that began sending mental health specialists instead of police to crises in 2020 has even been correlated with a decrease in low-level crime.

In July, the national 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline debuted, offering an alternative to calling 911. An analysis by WBEZ and MindSite News noted that most Illinois calls still go to out-of-state call centers, which can reduce responders’ familiarity with local resources available to callers.

Last year, Chicago started a program dubbed Crisis Assistance Response and Engagement (CARE), which sends a team comprising a paramedic, a mental health clinician, and a police officer to 911 calls involving mental health crises. Still in its pilot phase, CARE operates in select areas of the city, and only between 10:30 AM and 4 PM on weekdays.

The police department also has “Crisis Intervention Team officers,” police who have attended 40 hours of training in “the signs and symptoms of mental illness” and “how to interact, intervene, and de-escalate situations with persons in crisis.” 911 callers can specifically request a CIT officer. But they’re still cops, and still bring guns to mental health crises. In addition, according to the Policy Surveillance Program, police officers can initiate involuntary commitments in 28 states, including Illinois.

Our loved one’s death or forced removal from our community are the risks we take, us lovers and roommates, siblings and parents, of the seriously mentally ill, if we call for “help.” But we need help, desperately. For decades, my family has tried to provide my brother with the kind of care and first response our society won’t. If our love and labor alone could keep him safe and well, it would’ve worked already. Instead, it’s quite literally making us sick.

Love might be unconditional, but our own relationships and jobs, our own safety, the health of our own minds and bodies, have their limits. I understand why people make that call, despite knowing who it will summon and the potential violence those called will bring. I, too, have held my phone in my hand, weighing options that offer too few choices—and too many risks.


Significant issues remain around police use of involuntary commitments.


Thousands have survived one pandemic winter, only to now face another, still waiting for shelters to have spaces for them, to hear their names called for a public housing unit.


Pariahs amid the rainbow: young, queer, and homeless in Boystown

Read More

Tough callsKatie Prouton October 12, 2022 at 3:52 pm Read More »

Former Bulls player Ben Gordon accused of striking son: report

Former Bulls player Ben Gordon was arrested at LaGuardia Airport in New York after he allegedly struck his 10-year-old son.

According to a report by TMZ, an airline employee told police she saw Gordon hit the child Monday night. Authorities took the child to a local hospital and arrested Gordon. The TMZ report also said Gordon violated a restraining order by taking the child out of Illinois.

But a former girlfriend of Gordon’s named Ashley Banks told the New York Post that the Gordon did not hit the child. Banks claims Gordon was targeted with a false accusation because he is a celebrity.

“The problem is the child was traumatized,” said Banks, who dated Gordon from 2016 to 2020 according to the Post.

“The child saw his father being arrested, taken away,” Banks told the Post. “He was waiting in custody until his aunt picked him up. So that is the worst part of it, you know, and so we want to really protect him.”

Read More

Former Bulls player Ben Gordon accused of striking son: report Read More »

High school basketball: Indiana recruit Lenee Beaumont leads Benet into another season with high expectations

Lenee Beaumont has been around basketball about as long as she can remember.

Her dad, Mike, has coached in the boys program at Glenbard South for more than 20 years.

“As soon as I’d leave preschool, he’d have to take me to practice,” Beaumont said. “I’d be on the sideline, dribbling around and trying to shoot.”

All that practice has paid off in a big way. Today, Beaumont is a 6-foot point guard at Benet, heading into her senior season as one of the top players in the country. Ranked No. 81 in the class of 2023 by espnw/HoopGurlz, Beaumont is committed to Indiana.

Like a lot of athletes who played through the pandemic, Beaumont had an interesting trajectory in recruiting. She picked up her first Division I offer the summer before her freshmanyear, which was spent as a reserve learning from a talented upperclassgroup.

“I didn’t play too much on varsity as a freshman,” Beaumont said. “Our team was loaded.”

Indeed: the Redwingswent 29-3, led by Division I recruits Brooke Schramek (Wisconsin), Kendall Moriarty (Nebraska) and Kendall Holmes (DePaul).

Those veterans’ mentorship proved invaluable, Beaumont said:”Brooke Schramek, we had a big sister-little sister thing.”

After the pandemic eased, interest in Beaumont increased. First came offers from smaller schools, then the ACC, SEC and other Power Five conferences came calling.

“I went on a bunch of visits. I was really planning on waiting it out through AAU,” Beaumont said of her commitment.

But after visiting Indiana and getting to know the program and coaches, the timeline changed.

“I don’t know why I’m waiting,” she recalled thinking. “I knew I wanted to go to Indiana. I loved them the first time I stepped on campus.”

The Hoosiers have been a power under coach Teri Moren, reaching the Elite Eight in 2021. Beaumont got a sneak peek into what to expect playing for Moren over the summer, when she took part in the USA Basketball Women’s U18 camp where the Hoosiers coach was an assistant.

All that is in the future. For now, Beaumont is focused on her senior season. Benet was fourth in Class 4A last season, winning the program’s fourth state trophy in six seasons while competing in a conference (the East Suburban Catholic) that also featured 3A champ Carmel and 3A runner-up Nazareth.

Beaumont wouldn’t have it any other way.

“There’s a lot of good teams, which makes it fun,” she said. “I live for the moments, the close games.”

Benet coach Joe Kilbride appreciates having Beaumont to call on in those matchups.

“She’s so skilled,” he said, noting her career 45% accuracy from three-point range. Plus, he added, “she’s done a really good job in the weight room.”

Kilbride expects Beaumont to take her game to another level by looking more for her own shot this season,

“She’s a very unselfish kid. We’re not asking her to jack 40 shots a game,” he said. “She does need to be more assertive.”

Beaumont is ready to do whatever’s needed.

“I’ve been trying to work on being a leader,” she said. “Going into this year I was really working on my confidence on the court. When I’m not playing well, I lose confidence. [But] I feel like I’m more confident now.”

Read More

High school basketball: Indiana recruit Lenee Beaumont leads Benet into another season with high expectations Read More »