With six games remaining on the ChicagoBears schedule, one thing is clear: 2020 isn’t the year for this team. We aren’t implying that the Bears can’t still make the playoffs, and if the season ended today they would sneak in at the eight seed. But a never-ending quarterback carousel does little to raise anyone’s hopes for a deep playoff run. Fortunately, the lows of this season are nothing compared to some of the worst moments in Chicago Bears history.
Yes, you read that right. We’re here to reflect on some not-so-great highlights in our beloved football team’s history. Being a dedicated fan requires going through the highs and lows with your team year after year. We’ve certainly covered our fair share of Sunday night highlights and favorite games, but now it’s time to switch things up with the worst moments in Chicago Bears history.
Advertisement
The Double Doink
To start things off, let’s rip off the bandage with this recent memory. In the Wild Card round of the 2018 season, the Bears trailed the Philadelphia Eagles by one point with 56 seconds left on the clock. After driving down the field to set up a 43-yard field goal attempt, then Bears kicker Cody Parkey missed the game-winning kick as time expired. The phrase, “double doink” is a reference to how the ball hit the left upright and crossbar before bouncing into the end zone. Definitely a low point in history for Bears fans.
Advertisement
2011 NFC Championship
Oh, how the cheese head franchise finds its way to ruin things for Chicago fans. Back in the 2011 NFC Championship game, the Bears were sniffing at a Super Bowl berth for the first time since 2006. Their opponent was NFC North rival, the Green Bay Packers. After losing Jay Cutler to a knee injury, backup QB Caleb Hanie was tasked with leading the team to victory. Unfortunately, this would never happen, and the Packers won 21-14 off a game-winning interception return.
While this isn’t necessarily tied to one specific point in Bears history, it’s a bad habit that the team can’t seem to break. Whether due to injures or poor draft selections, the Chicago Bears have always struggled with quarterback play. We had Jay Cutler way back when, but he always seemed to get injured. We had a high pick in the 2017 draft, but we selected Mitchell Trubisky over Patrick Mahomes and DeShaun Watson. The quarterback curse has to end at some point!
Advertisement
2006 Super Bowl Loss
It wasn’t too long ago that the Bears found themselves competing in Super Bowl 41. In fact, things couldn’t have started much better after former return specialist, Devin Hester, ran the opening kick back 92 yards for a score. This would be a high point in the game, and by the time halftime rolled around the Bears trailed 16-14. They would fail to retake the lead again, making this one of the worst moments in Chicago Bears history.
Advertisement
The Rodgers-Cob Hail Mary
This moment in Chicago Bears history might be worse than the Super Bowl loss in 2006. And of course, the Green Bay Packers are involved. Leading 28-27 in the final week of the season, the Bears needed to hold off Aaron Rodgers for 46 seconds. And they needed it badly. The winner of the game would earn a playoff spot. With the Packers sitting on a 4th and long, Rodgers found a wide-open Randall Cobb on a busted coverage. The rest was history. Despite the final play, this game is honestly pretty entertaining to watch. There’s plenty of back and forth between both sides in a high-stakes game which makes for a pretty classic matchup against the Packers.
Advertisement
At UrbanMatter, U Matter. And we think this matters.
Tell us what you think matters and what we should write about next in the comments below!
Sometimes I think I will scream if I hear or read one more story about Thanksgiving that centers around food. A day to give thanks is not meant to be a day all about food and eating.
Not all. But being thankful for food — particular, special food, whether it’s available only at “the holidays” or it’s a special family recipe — is just fine. Just remember to be thankful for food, not thankful about food.
One of the quotations about thankfulness that I found on my recent “browsing through Bartlett’s” is one that reminded me of my recent post about tea.
“Thank God for tea! What would the world do without tea? — how did it exist? I am glad I was not born before tea.” — from “Recipe for Salad” by Sydney Smith (1711-1845)
Also, it’s hard to realize in more urban parts of the country, but Thanksgiving is related to harvest festivals — a way to give thanks that there will be enough food to get through the winter. That has taken on a new tone this year, but many of us will still hear, if only by computer linkup, one of the more familiar hymns of thanks:
“Come, ye thankful people, come,
Raise the song of harvest home;
All is safely gathered in,
Ere the winter storms begin.”
— by Henry Alford (1810-1871)
Thanks to all of you for spending some of your reading time with me. Happy Thanksgiving, whether you’re officially celebrating the holiday in the U.S. or just taking a moment to add some thankfulness to your un-official days.
I moved to Chicago from the south suburbs in 1986. I have diverse interests, but I love writing about what I’m interested in. Whether it’s a personal interest or part of my career, the correct words to get the idea across are important to me. I love words and languages — French and Scottish words enrich my American English. My career has included years as a journalist and years working in museums, and the two phases were united by telling stories. I’m serious about words and stories. So here I am, ready to tell stories about words and their languages.
And reporting bad news about Covid-19 is a good thing.
This should shock the defenders of the “unbiased” media.
“Why Is All COVID-19 News Bad News?” is a National Bureau of Economic Research study that analyzed the tone of COVID-19 related English-language news articles written since January 1, 2020.
What the researchers, Bruce Sacerdote, Ranjan Sehgal and Molly Cook found was an overwhelming level of negative reporting, even in the face of good news.
Ninety one percent of stories by U.S. major media outlets are negative in tone versus fifty four percent for non-U.S. major sources and sixty five percent for scientific journals.
The negativity of the U.S. major media is notable even in areas with positive scientific developments including school re-openings and vaccine trials.
Media negativity is unresponsive to changing trends in new COVID-19 cases or the political leanings of the audience. U.S. major media readers strongly prefer negative stories about COVID-19, and negative stories in general.
Stories of increasing COVID-19 cases outnumber stories of decreasing cases by a factor of 5.5 even during periods when new cases are declining.
Among U.S. major media outlets, stories discussing President Donald Trump and hydroxychloroquine are more numerous than all stories combined that cover companies and individual researchers working on COVID-19 vaccines.
To highlight the findings, the authors give us this example: A British publication, the Oxford Mail published a story about how University of Oxford scientists were working on a vaccine that could be rapidly developed–something that the given wisdom at the time said was not possible. That was on February 18.
Not until late April did the major American media–CNN, The New York Times, the Washington Post and even Fox News–pick up this good news story. Even then, the American media put a negative spin on the story:
The U.S. based stories emphasized caveats from health officials and experts downplaying the optimistic timeline and past success of the Oxford researchers. The earliest available (major outlet) U.S. story is from CNN on April 23rd and begins with a quote from England’s Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty saying that the probability of having a vaccine or treatment “anytime in the next calendar year” is “incredibly small.”
Nothing to see here, right?
Particularly timely is the study’s examination of reporting about schools, noting the:
…disconnect between U.S. major media reporting on school reopenings and scientific findings on the same topic; the reporting is overwhelmingly negative, while the scientific literature tells a more optimistic story.
This is especially outrageous because while student infection rates are low– 0.14 percent–90 percent of school reopening articles from U.S. major media are negative, compared with 56 percent in foreign media.
Perhaps some readers will attack the study based on the false assumption that it is pro-Trump. Not so. The researchers could not find a correlation between negativity and political position.
The study supports the common sense warning that American public opinion is misguided and uninformed when it comes to getting the complete story about Covid-19. Especially when it comes to reopening schools.
The study perhaps reveals that the belief in major American newsrooms is that the public wants negative, not positive news. Conflict and nastiness are on the menu and reasons to be hopeful are discarded as “uninteresting.”
If the media think that positive news about vaccines and the novel virus is uninteresting, there’s not much hope that the American media will ever get it right.
To subscribe to the Barbershop, type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.
The featured image above gained attention when it was thought to be a picture of Brian Kemp (left) and Gregory McMichael (right).
Kemp, former Georgia Secretary of State, is best known for stealing the governorship from Stacey Abrams, refusing to recuse himself from overseeing an election in which he was a candidate. His crimes include a multitude of GOP-type voter suppression techniques.
The black letters boldly emblazoned on Stachowiak’s yellow shirt proclaim, ALLAH IS NOT GOD.
To me, rumination about the nature or existence of God is pointless. It’s mental masturbation without the possibility of release.
I capitalize the word “God,” out of respect for those who believe. Isn’t that the point of the 1st Amendment?
We have a constitutional right to believe or not believe anything we choose and an obligation to respect the beliefs of others.
Some of us, however, are not so inclined. Some of us think that the beliefs of others are irrelevant and/or evil and that if we can not dictate their actions based upon our beliefs, then our religious freedom is being abridged.
The some of us to whom I refer are the Religious Right. Evangelicals and bible thumpers of all stripes who have weaponized religion to subjugate those who don’t share their beliefs.
They pretend to be persecuted while working feverishly to limit the freedom of others to live lives of their choosing.
For the record, IT WAS NEVER ILLEGAL TO SAY MERRY CHRISTMAS.
Any institution that chose to switch to the less faith based greeting of Happy Holidays did so out of an outsized supplication to political correctness.
I’ve always said Merry Christmas and, like Bill Murray in Scrooged, enjoy that one time of the year when we make an effort to be a little nicer, a little more generous of spirit.
Those on the right are big on appropriating things for themselves.
They were the party of law and order, until they collectively decided that they would not hold their president accountable for the most lawless administration in American history.
They were the party of military support, until their president began trashing American heroes, military leaders and Gold Star families.
They are the party that gets to decide what it is to be an American and they do it at rallies where they fly Nazi and Confederate flags.
They were staunch opponents of Vladimir Putin until he started running our foreign and domestic policies through his orange puppet.
There’s about a billion and half Muslims in the world, some three and half million of them living here in the United States. Who is Jim Stachowiak to tell them that their God is not real?
In the second chapter of the Koran it says, And your Allah is One Allah. There is no god but He, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.
The Torah makes the same claim, as does the New Testament. As a point of fact, IT WAS MAN WHO DECIDED THAT JESUS WAS A DEITY.
Followers of Jesus did that with the help of a heathen named Constantine who needed to consolidate his power as emperor of Rome.
I’ve been critical of Christians of late, but not for their beliefs, rather for their betrayal of those beliefs. If you call yourself Christian, you have to stand up to those who turn away from some of his most basic teachings, the most basic virtues of humanity.
Christ urged his followers to heal the sick, not to take away their access to health care. He preached feeding the hungry, not ending food assistance programs.
He said to welcome strangers and give shelter to the those in need. Does that sound like Donald Trump, Brian Kemp or even Pat Robertson?
By turning away from his principles, you marginalize the guy you say is your savior. Attacking the beliefs of others doesn’t demonstrate devotion to yours.
Maybe Allah isn’t God. Then again, there are many who think of Jesus as just a really good guy, someone whose examples we could all follow.
And he was, after all, a good carpenter.
Subscribe to the Chicago Board of Tirade * You will never get SPAM
* Your email address will never be sold or given away
* You will only receive emails on days I post
* You can unsubscribe at any time * Just type your email address in the box below and click the “Create Subscription” button
Bob “RJ” Abrams is a political junkie, all-around malcontent and supporter of America’s warriors. After a career path that took him from merchandising at rock concerts to managing rock bands to a 27-year stint in the pits of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, he’s seen our nation from up and down.
As Regional Coordinator of the Warriors’ Watch Riders (a motorcycle support group for the military and their families) Bob plays an active role in our nation’s support of America’s warriors and their families.
Send comments and/or suggestions to [email protected]
Who will start at quarterback for the ChicagoBears this Sunday night? One insider believes he knows.
Sunday night, the Chicago Bears may be on their last leg in terms of a playoff run in 2020. What started so promising, a 5-1 beginning, has turned for the worse as the 5-5 Bears now sit outside the NFC playoff picture.
Headed for a potential buzz saw in the Green Bay Packers, the downtrodden Bears are looking for something — anything — to spark the offense. While the defense continues to play well as they have all season long, that side of the ball simply needs a little more time to rest as games (and the season) go on.
The Bears are 31st in total offense, and there really hasn’t been a bright spot on that side of the ball. Aside from Allen Robinson performing well when he is targeted, the Bears don’t have much to be excited about offensively, and much of it stems from quarterback play and lack of an offensive line.
Chicago will need some kind of quarterback play on Sunday night to beat Aaron Rodgers and the Packers, who are coming off a loss. This isn’t a position you want to be in if you’re the Bears. Rodgers usually responds well after a loss, and he could put the nail in the coffin of this Bears season on Sunday night.
But, who will be the quarterback for the Bears? Nick Foles had overtaken Mitchell Trubisky earlier in the season, but with Foles’ health in question, he may not be ready to go. Trubisky, on the other hand, is coming back from a shoulder injury he suffered on his only play against the New Orleans Saints a couple of weeks back.
The Chicago Tribune’s Brad Biggs believes he has the answer to the question every fan is asking: Who will start Sunday night?
On Monday, Trubisky was the only quarterback present at practice, which was just a session of stretching. That seemed to give him a slight leg up on Foles, but with the rest of the week’s practice yet to come, we have yet to find out exactly what Matt Nagy’s plan is.
The last time we saw Trubisky against the Packers was Week 15 of 2019, where he completed 29 of 53 passes for 334 yards, one touchdown, two picks and a quarterback rating of 64.5.
If he does indeed get the start, you can’t help but wonder if this benching has done anything to his psyche, whether positive or negative. Trubisky is a guy who has seemed mentally impressionable throughout his career, and this benching may have knocked his confidence down quite a bit. If that’s the case, we’re in for a long game.
On the other hand, maybe he used this as a positive thing. Maybe he’s more motivated than ever before. We could see him come out and use his legs like he did back in 2018, where he was the best version of himself.
Regardless, if Trubisky is the guy, he needs to realize this is a must-win situation for the Bears. Five straight losses would send the Bears into 2021 in a hurry.
On August 7, 1974, and on September 15, 1998, the Chicago Tribune editorial board did something that I am still waiting for it to do in 2020: It published an editorial demanding the immediate resignation of the President of the United States.
I dearly want the Tribune to do that now, any day. If we’re lucky, the Chicago Sun-Times editorial board will do so too, as will any number of ed boards around the country, just as scores of papers did in 1974 with President Nixon, and in 1998 with President Clinton.
President Trump’s actions in office this year alone have been far worse than anything Nixon or Clinton did (even Trump agreed with the latter), and yet to my knowledge, only one newspaper in the country has published an editorial in 2020 demanding his resignation. That was the Portland Press Herald in Maine, which wrote on June 5 that Trump — just the third president in U.S. history to be impeached — “lacks the character, maturity and judgment to lead the country in a perilous time.”
That paper cited Trump’s failure in three areas: containing COVID-19, rebuilding the economy during the recession and bringing peace to the protests over the police murder of George Floyd.
The pandemic has only gotten worse. Tomorrow, many Americans will spend Thanksgiving without their full family celebrations so as not to spread or contract the virus, while far too many other Americans will flout medical advice and see family anyhow. I have trouble placing too much blame at the feet of the Americans who get together with family, since many will be following the advice of the president, who one study showed was “likely the largest driver of … COVID-19 misinformation” in the country.
The president’s attack on our elections
The president’s COVID-19 lies became even more dangerous when he mixed them with the election. While the president spent the summer and fall raging against masks, he also raged against mail-in ballots, seemingly hoping that the people who listened to him on one would be the same people who would listen to him on the other.
Those Americans more inclined to vote for his challenger would also be the ones less inclined to vote in person, and since mail-in ballots would be counted after in-person ballots, Trump would, the thinking went, simply declare victory on election night even when votes were still being counted.
He would do this with preemptive legal action, he said on Nov. 2, the day before the election: “I think it’s a terrible thing when ballots can be collected after an election. … I think a lot of fraud and misuse can take place … and we’re going to go in the night of, as soon as that election’s over, we’re going in with our lawyers.”
This is, of course, exactly what happened. And this is where the president committed an offense against Americans that is the second worst thing he’s done in 2020, after the nearly 260,000 COVID deaths on his watch: He didn’t simply take baseless legal action or claim that he believed he was going to win — he claimed on election night that he “already (had) won.”
“We were getting ready to win this election,” Trump said in a press conference while millions of votes were still being counted in an election he would end up losing in a historic defeat for an incumbent. “And frankly, we did win this election.”
He baselessly claimed that the election was a “major fraud on our nation” and said he would take his case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“We will win this,” he said, “and as far as I’m concerned, we already have won.”
Fast forward three weeks, and still no newspaper that I’ve seen besides the Press Herald has published an editorial demanding the president’s resignation. I would imagine that editorial boards feel that with Joe Biden winning the election, such an editorial would be pointless.
Why it matters that the president won’t concede
Yet we now have another problem that demands our journalism leaders: Trump won’t concede.
Donald Trump’s governing principle is simple: Donald Trump is the lone source of truth and anything that objects is fake. The press is fake, negative news stories about him are fake, photos of his sparse inauguration crowd are fake, COVID-19 is fake — and now, the election is fake.
None of this is funny. The president has attacked our elections ever since he won in 2016, back when he lied and said that he only lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton because of three to five million illegal votes cast solely for her. He launched a commission to investigate voter fraud, and disbanded it a year later when it came up empty. He boomed repeatedly and with no evidence about impending voter fraud in the 2020 election, and now, since election day, his barrage of legal action has strictly targeted states he lost — six of them in all — with repeated attempts to disenfranchise Americans simply because they likely voted against him.
The closest he has come to a concession was two days ago, when he tweeted that, “I am recommending that Emily and her team do what needs to be done with regard to initial protocols, and have told my team to do the same.”
It would be easy to dismiss all of this as the desperate, innocuous ramblings of a man who one way or another will be out of the White House on January 20. I can see editorial boards discarding the notion of an editorial calling for his concession out of the assumption that his departure is a foregone conclusion.
But the effects of his refusal to abide by this previously rote, American norm are proving deadly for both our democracy and our electorate. I’ve heard plenty of people, including friends and family, say that none of these efforts are “working,” citing his court losses as proof of his failure. This depends on one’s definition of “working.” I look at the number of GOP elected officials who, today, still refuse to acknowledge President-elect Joe Biden, and I see a win for Trump. I look at pro-Trump polling and I see a win for Trump.
Last week, a Reuters / Ipsos poll found that 52% of Republican respondents believed that the president had “rightfully won” the 2020 election. This week, according to a CNBC/Change Research poll, that number is even higher, as 73% of all polled Trump voters believe that Trump is the “legitimate winner” of this election.
The longer that the president holds this office and continues claiming that he won an election that he lost, the longer his followers will continue to believe that the American system is rigged against him.
This is a deep problem for our elections moving forward; mild rebukes from journalists help legitimize this bogus notion that every vote not cast for a given candidate is suspect, and that no election is finished until it has been baseless challenged in court.
A more immediate problem is in our attempt to at long last contain and defeat the virus. Those who believe Trump “rightfully won” an election he lost are unlikely to follow any safety measures imposed by the rightful president whom they deem a usurper.
Trump is going to be Trump. We all know that. But he did not take this office, and keep it, by virtue of his own lies alone. He had many accomplices along the way, including a range of journalists — local and national, in print and on the air — who too often did not hold him accountable.
Why we need strong newspaper editorials
This is where newspaper editorials come in. No one who has watched this president even a day in the past four years believes he will resign (at least not without some kind of personal benefit) and it certainly does not seem believable that he will ever do anything as noble and humble as concede.
But the purpose of an editorial is not necessarily to lasso a desired outcome. It’s to use your credibility, status and influence to draw a line of acceptable behavior. An editorial demanding that Trump concede and resign, with a splashy headline to share the world round, creates a new environment around the president and his actions. Were the Tribune, Sun-Times or any other major American newspaper to demand his concession and/or his resignation, that action gives cover to other papers to do the same. It gives cover to GOP politicians to do the same. It gives cover to business leaders to do the same.
I might expect less from our hometown papers had they endorsed him, but neither did in either 2016 or 2020. Both papers endorsed Joe Biden this year, while also arguing against Trump’s re-election. The Tribune did so rather meekly in my opinion — (“There is value in electing a president who does not insult, mock or demean. Our country can and must do better.”) — but the Sun-Times came out guns blazing, writing:
“It would be enough for us to argue here for a vote against Donald Trump. Our country can’t take any more of him. If the Democratic alternative were a sock puppet, we’d urge a vote for the sock puppet.”
Both boards have at least published editorials noting Biden’s victory, and the damage that Trump is creating in denying that. The Sun-Times went first, on Nov. 13, with a piece titled, “Every day Trump won’t get out of the way he puts our country in danger.” That was pretty close to a demand for him to concede, with the board writing, “President Donald Trump is throwing up every obstacle to a smooth transition to a Biden administration, in keeping with his refusal to accept that Biden won the Nov. 3 election, and the consequences of his petulance are more than politically unfortunate.”
Three days later, the Tribune board published one titled, “Trump’s baseless claims won’t change reality. He lost the election.” That editorial’s boldest statement is simply that the president lost, and that while he “doesn’t have to like the result … that won’t change the reality.”
These are clear words, but not strong ones. They are certainly not direct and potent enough to combat the president’s assault on our elections, an assault happening at this very moment in Wisconsin, our neighbor to the north, where a conservative group has filed a lawsuit in hopes that Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled legislature might defy the will of the people and instead cast the state’s 10 electoral votes in favor of President Trump.
With this kind of outrageous battery against voters, neither the Sun-Times’ nor the Tribune’s editorials pack the blunt force of a headline reading, “Trump must concede and resign now.”
A plea to the editorial boards of the Tribune and Sun-Times
We once had that type of strength from our papers of record.
On August 7, 1974, the Tribune concluded its editorial about President Nixon (titled “The case is complete…”) with the following:
“Surely wiser heads in the White House will continue to urge Mr. Nixon to resign. … Getting the matter over with as quickly as possible must now be the first order of business — in the interest of the country and of Mr. Nixon himself.”
Nixon announced his resignation the next day, effective at noon on August 9.
On September 15, 1998, that board was even more direct about the not-yet-impeached President Clinton. Titled “The president’s last chance at honor,” this editorial was published four days after the release of the Starr Report, with the board admonishing him in clear, concise language.
“For now, however, the question before the nation is what to do about Bill Clinton, liar under oath, obstructor of justice — and president. Congress, uncharacteristically sober, is moving toward a decision on whether to conduct an impeachment inquiry.
“Clinton could make all that moot by electing to do the right thing, the honorable thing: Resign.”
Since the middle of the year, I have pushed the Tribune and Sun-Times — and their editorial board editors Kristen McQueary and Tom McNamee, respectively — to publish editorials demanding that Trump resign, and now, concede. I’ve done so via Twitter, email, and with McQueary, a voicemail to the Tribune office, with no response. Incredibly, the conservative Washington Examiner, once squarely in Trump’s corner (and he in its), beat both the Tribune and the Sun-Times to the “concede now” editorial punch.
I don’t believe that McQueary and McNamee, and the boards they lead, have any more or less responsibility to publish these editorials than any other major paper. I merely focus on them because they’re my hometown papers. My family subscribed to both growing up, and I’ve been published by both as an adult.
So my focus is here, in hopes that America can start a wave that will roll back the anti-Constitutional, anti-American insanity of a president claiming victory in an election he’s lost and pushing his supporters to believe that their franchise has been stolen from them, all while presiding over a pandemic he refuses to acknowledge as real even as it kills hundreds of thousands of his constituents.
I want to see these editorials published by my papers, and no, I don’t care that he has less than two months remaining in office. Even at this late hour, I still want our mightiest institutions to hold Donald Trump to the standard of the presidency, rather than holding the presidency to the standard of Donald Trump.
Welcome to 30 Adoption Portraits in 30 Days, hosted by Portrait of an Adoption. This series will feature guest posts by people with widely varying adoption experiences and perspectives.
What Will Life Look Like for Him at 21?
By Julie Cowan
Our son Kyle, who we adopted at birth, turned eighteen in February. While most eighteen-year-olds get ready to fly with independence, Kyle’s life ahead is one of uncertainty.
Recently, we had to go to court to establish guardianship, as Kyle will never be able to make decisions for himself. I wrote about his physical and cognitive impairments six years ago for this series. You can read about our adoption experience here.
In June he was graduated from a high school special-needs program. Now he has three years in a transition program ahead of him. Three years for us to decide what life for him will look like when he’s twenty-one, after the routine of school is done.
It might be shared housing with young adults his age, caregivers, and possibly a small job. What we know is that at fifty-six and fifty-eight, we can’t physically care for him forever. We’d be doing him a disservice to not provide him with daily social and peer contact.
Last year in school, he did some greeting at Trader Joe’s and was a big hit. With his smile, he got great feedback. He would hit a vocal switch for example, that said “welcome to Trader Joe’s, get your pumpkins $2.99.”
One woman said she planned her shopping trip when she knew he would be there, because she loved his smile so much. That melted my momma’s heart!
As has been the case for a number of years, both physically and emotionally, he is hard to take care of some days. Physically because he is 154 pounds now and wheelchair-bound, and he needs almost total care.
The hard part emotionally is that as he’s aged, the seizure medication or brain abnormality has caused him to scream more. It’s worse now with social distancing and online school. It’s difficult to hear the screams and it wears on us. We as parent caregivers continue with periodic counseling to help us handle the stress.
Along with him turning eighteen, it came time for the end of our legal agreement with his birth mother to send letters and pictures. She has had no contact with us since he was one year old.
Our letters and pictures were never returned from the post office box, so we assume she was still receiving them. Many times, I struggled with my fierce mother’s love “well if she doesn’t want to respond or know him screw her.”
My husband has always been more even-tempered and compassionate, and he wanted to maintain the connection, so I continued to send letters and pictures year after year, hoping they brought her some happiness. When he turned eighteen, I wrote her a final letter, letting her know it would be the last one she would receive unless we heard from her, asking for further communication.
I wrote to her about how there was one day when Kyle came home with an unsigned note in purple felt pen in his backpack. It said, “Kyle the world would be a better place if everyone was like you!”
I told her, “K, I’m sorry you chose not to know him, it has been a privilege to be his parents. He is a very special young man.” And so, there will be no future relationship for him with her. Something we’d hoped for so long ago with “open adoption” but didn’t happen.
Kyle is still handsome, funny, loves the Seahawks and Huskies and HGTV. He also obsesses about Taco Time, and he still adores his younger sister, Hayley.
We continue to experience a very positive open adoption with Hayley’s birth family. At fifteen, she texts and writes with her birth mom T and birth grandma and occasionally birth dad. Pre Covid, she spent time with them each summer the last few years.
She has enjoyed the opportunity to meet extended family. A year ago, she was able to meet her half birth sister, who is seven years younger than she is. They had a special couple of hours together.
So, when Hayley launches at eighteen, she will have had a solid start at maintaining those relationships with her birth family. We couldn’t be happier! As we say, “more people to love her!”
Bio: Julie Cowan works as a nurse. She, Randy, Kyle and Hayley live in Bellevue.
* * * * Carrie Goldman is the host of Portrait of an Adoption. She is an award-winning author, speaker, and bullying prevention educator. Follow Carrie’s blog Portrait of an Adoption on Facebook and Twitter
To continue receiving posts from Portrait of an Adoption, simply type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button.
For the seventh straight year, in honor of November being National Adoption Awareness Month, Portrait of an Adoption is running a special series called 30 Adoption Portraits in 30 Days. Designed to give a voice to the many different perspectives of adoption, this series will feature guest posts by adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, waiting adoptive parents, and foster parents-turned-adoptive parents. Painful and beautiful, these stories will bring you a deeper understanding of what adoption looks like, allowing you to appreciate the many brushstrokes that comprise a family portrait.
I am a writer, artist, wife and mother of three fantastic girls! My new children’s adoption book is Jazzy’s Quest: Adopted and Amazing, and my adult nonfiction book is Bullied: What Every Parent, Teacher, and Kid Needs To Know About Ending the Cycle of Fear. And I LOVE chocolate!
This five-bedroom home in northwest suburban Barrington Hills has five bathrooms and two half-bathrooms and rests on a lot that spans 4¾ acres. The home’s interior features extensive millwork, crown molding and a two-story bridal staircase. The chef-grade kitchen touts new quartz countertops, an island that also serves as a breakfast bar and stainless steel appliances by Sub-Zero, Five Star and KitchenAid. The primary bedroom suite includes a sitting room with one of three gas fireplaces in the home, a private balcony, a wet bar and a custom walk-in closet. Its bathroom has new marble vanities, a steam shower and a whirlpool tub. Unique features range from a golf putting green room to a home theater and a secret playroom. An outdoor pool and a four-car garage complete the home.
Sundae is an adorable, very active and skittish, six-month-old, male Abyssinian tri-color guinea pig looking for a loving guardian.
Sundae came to Friends of Petraits Rescue when his human went back to college and said she had no time for him. She had bought him and a brother at a pet store, but the brother died soon after their purchase.
So, we think he will enjoy the company of other guinea pigs. Even if he’s living in a home with another guinea pig in another cage, guinea pigs enjoy chatting with each other.
Guinea pigs eat a diet of unlimited Timothy and Orchard hays; a handful of guinea pig pellets, and fresh vegetables including romaine, red leaf and green leaf lettuces, cilantro, cucumbers, carrots, tomatoes, etc. Guinea pigs, similar to humans, can’t manufacture their own vitamin C, so they need to supplement their diet with red pepper and many other vitamin C-rich foods. He LOVES his fresh foods and pulls them under his little hidey hut to enjoy them in privacy.
Please read up on guinea pig care and diet before adopting by visiting this excellent web site http://www.guinealynx.info/
He would love a home with people who will handle him daily, keep him well fed, his nails trimmed, and keep his habitat nice and clean.
If you’re interested in possibly adopting Sundae, please fill out an adoption application at https://friendsofpetraits.com/guinea-pig-adoption-application/.
He is being fostered in Chicago’s Andersonville neighborhood.
His adoption fee of $35 benefits the Friends of Petraits Rescue. For an additional $75, we’ll include a package of absolutely everything you need to care for him including a large cage, pellets, hay, hidey hut and water bottle.
And, yes … Friends of Petraits is handling masked, minimum contact, socially distant adoptions.
Leave a comment