Let’s have a rational discussion about vote reform
today at 10:46 am
Let’s put aside the argument that Democrats stole the election and examine the obvious problems with the flawed process. And fix those problems, whether we do it now or later.
Some of the problems highlighted by this year’s election:
- Chain of custody. At no time should the ballots be out of the hands of election officials who have sworn to follow the law. When the ballots are handled by partisans or third parties, the opportunities for fraud abound. For example, it allows a partisan to toss the ballots of opposite party candidates. Chain of custody in elections is as important as it is in criminal prosecutions.
- Eligible voter verification. Why is this even an issue? Ensuring that every vote was cast by someone who is qualified to vote is not suppression. It is rational and reasonable. Cleansing the voter rolls of people who died or moved out of the jurisdiction is so reasonable that opposing it is stupefying. The requirement for in-person ID is already been implemented in Wisconsin and for early voting in Illinois. Getting yourself to a secretary of state’s office for a driver’s licenses is not considered to be driver suppression (at least not yet). Even the liberal Brookings Institution called the registration roles a mess. While that was 20 years ago, there’s no reason to think they have gotten any better.
- Mail-in voting. Ballots should only be sent to voters who request them and whose qualification to vote can be verified. Shotgun distribution of ballots puts them in too many hands of unqualified voters.
Speaking earlier of the Brooking Institution, here is what it had to say in the same study about those forms of remote voting:
There are costs associated with these newer forms of mail and early voting: the loss of a shared community experience; the irrelevance of late-breaking campaign events; the threat to privacy provided by secret ballots at polling places; the risks of vote buying and selling; and complications for the timely counting of ballots. Remote Internet voting from home or work incurs these costs and many additional ones. As summarized by the recent Internet Policy Institute report of a workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation, “Remote Internet voting systems pose significant risk to the integrity of the voting process, and should not be fielded for use in public elections until substantial technical and social science issues are resolved.”
If we can leave the partisan claims out of it, it should be apparent from this election 20 years after this warning that those technical and social science issues haven’t been resolved.
Millions of Americans no longer trust the system and that should not be casually brushed aside as if it were just a Republican effort to suppress votes. It’s too late to fix this system in this election cycle, but if we can set aside flaming rhetoric for a time, maybe we can get it done.
To subscribe to the Barbershop, type your email Address the address s in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.